Challenges for Legal Education in the Era of I.r.4.0

Authors

  • Ida Madieha Abdul Ghani Azmi Civil Law Department, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2020.11.2.2

Keywords:

Industrial Revolution 4.0, Legal Education, Body of Knowledge, Skill sets

Abstract

The formulation of the National Policy on Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR4.0) and Internet of things signals the Malaysian government readiness to come up with the necessary policy framework for the digitalised era. It has been said that universities’ curriculum structure and instructional design must also be revisited to ready the graduate to face the onslaught of technological revolution. Through content analysis of relevant literature, this paper analyses the myriad ways in which legal education has been impacted by IR4.0 both in terms of the ‘body of knowledge’ as well as the ‘skill sets’ required for law students to survive in the era of automatous systems. The paper is structured to first explain the concept of IR4.0 and how some national countries leverage the digital technology to improve their economy or facilitate social transformation. The paper proceeds with a discussion of how autonomous system, artificial intelligence and data analytics can enhance the instructional design of teaching and researching law. In terms of the body of knowledge, most of the legal principles drawn for the brick and mortar environment are no longer relevant in the IR4.0 era. The paper reveals that the traditional method that focuses on the training of law graduates to think like a lawyer by understanding the reasoning in the judgement of cases or the preparation of conveyancing and court documents are no longer relevant in the IR4.0 era as these activities could easily be undertaken by bots. Instead, law students should be imparted with a multiplicity of human skills that could not be performed by autonomous systems such as those involving conscience, high level thinking, and emotion such as mediation, negotiation, counselling, court prosecution, advocacy, witness examination, plea mitigation as well as social skills, resource management skills, technical skills and most importantly system skills.

References

Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. (2017). How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3066816 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3066816.

Ashley, K., Branting, K., Margolis, H., R., Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Legal reasoning and artificial intelligence: How computers “think” like lawyers. The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 8(1), Article 2.

Atabekos, A., & Yestrebov, O. (2018). Legal status of artificial intelligence across countries: Legislation on the move. European Research Studies Journal, XXI (4). UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (27-51)

Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2017). Digital Economy: Opening up the conversation. Retrieved from https://www.industry.gov.au/innovation/Digital-Economy/ Documents/Digital-Economy-Strategy-Consultation-Paper. pdf.

Banerjee, P. M., & Belson, G. (2015). Digital education 2.0: From content to connections. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte. com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-16/future-digital-education-technology.html.

Botta, A., de Donato, W., Persico, W., & Pescape, A. (2016). Integration of cloud computing and Internet of things: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 684-700.

Brennan-Marquez, K., & Henderson, S. E. (2019). Artificial intelligence and role reversible judgement. 109 J. Crim. L, & Criminology, 137.

Campbell, R. W. (2014). The end of law schools: Legal education in the era of legal service business. Mississippi Law Journal, 85(1).

Carraz, R., & Harayama, Y. (2018). Japan’s innovation systems at the crossroads: Society 5.0. Digital Asia, 33-4. Retrieved from https://www.kas.de/documents/288143/4843367/panorama_ digital_asia_v3a_Carraz_Harayama.pdf/b57f6b67-f317-cfc5-010c-4ee501c3a398..https://www.industry.gov.au/ innovation/Digital-Economy/Documents/Digital-Economy-Strategy-Consultation-Paper.pdf.

Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans a Math Phys Eng Sci. Nov 28, 376(2133):20180080.

Christensen, S., & Kift, S. (2000) Graduate attributes and legal skills: Integration or disintegration? Legal Education Review, 8(11), 2. Committee for Economic Development of Australia (CEDA). (2015). Australia’s future workforce. Retrieved from https://www.ceda.com.au/Research-and-policy/All-CEDA-research/ Research-catalogue/Australia-s-future-workforce.

Deloitte Digital. (2015). Higher education – Digital growth and innovation. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/ en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-16/future-digital-education-technology.html.

Durovic, M., & Janssen, A. (2018). The formation of smart contracts and beyond: Shaking the Fundamentals of Contract Law. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net. UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (27-51)

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 47-50. Retrieved from https://www. jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/220th_Special_ Article_02.pdf.

Kingston, J. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and Legal liability, from book Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV, 269-279. Retrieved from www. researchgate.net.

Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B-J.,, Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., & Lucivero, F. (2017). Regulatory challenges of robotics: Some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(1), 1-44.

Lewis, S. C., Sanders, A. K., & Carmody, C. (2019). Libel by algorithm? Automated journalism and the threat of legal liability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 60-81. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077699018755983.

Liao, Y. Deschamps, F., Rocha Loures, E. F., & Pierin Ramos, L. F. (2017). Past, present and future Industry 4.0 – A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576.

Madakam, S., Ramaswamy, R., Tripathi, S. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT): A literature review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3, 164-173.

Madison, M. J. (2018). An invitation regarding law and legal education, and imagining the future. U of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No 2018-03. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3122624.

Maple, S. (2017). Security and privacy in the Internet of Things. Journal of Cyber Policy, 2(2), 155-184.

MIMOS. (2015) National Internet of Things (IoT) Strategic roadmap: A summary. Retrieved from http://www.mimos. my/iot/National_IoT_Strategic_Roadmap_Summary.pdf.

Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA). (2015). Programme Standards: Law and Shariah Law. Malaysia: Malaysian Qualifications Agency.

Payton, A. (2017) Skilling for Tomorrow. 26thNational VET Research Conference ‘No Frills’. Retrieved from https://www.ncver. edu.au/research-and-statistics/publications/all-publications/ skilling-for-tomorrow. UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (27-51)

Penprase, B. E. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Higher Education, Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In Nancy W. Gleason (Ed.), Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan.

Raskin, M. (2017). The law and legality of smart contracts. 1 Geo. L. Tech. Rev, 305.

Simshaw, D. (2018). Ethical issues in robo-lawyering: The need for guidance on developing and using artificial intelligence in the practice of law. Hastings Law Journal, 70, 173–213.

Smart Nation and Digital Government Office. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.smartnation.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/smart-nation strategy_nov2018.pdf. State of Wisconsin v Eric L. Loomis (No 2015AP157-CR). Retrieved from https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/ DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171690

Susskind, R. (1996). The future of law: The challenges of information technology. UK: Oxford University Press.

Susskind, R. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. UK: Oxford University Press.

Sharon, C., & Sally, K. (2000). Graduate attributes and legal skills: Integration or disintegration? Legal Education Review, 8(11) (2).

Telstra Corporation Ltd & Anor v Phone Directories Company Ptd & Ors [2010] FCAC 149.

The World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/ WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf. World Economic Forum. (n.d). The fourth industrial revolution by Klaus Schwab. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/ about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2020

How to Cite

Abdul Ghani Azmi, I. M. (2020). Challenges for Legal Education in the Era of I.r.4.0. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2020.11.2.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-14
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/uumjls2020.11.2.2