Mapping the Landscape of Driving Behavior and Road Safety Research: A Scientometric Perspective (2000–2025)

Elias Md Radzi; Zuraida Hassan

doi:10.32890/ssmj2026.3.1.1

Authors

Elias Md Radzi School of Business Management,College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Zuraida Hassan School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ssmj2026.3.1.1

Keywords:

Driving Behaviour, Road Safety, Scientometric Analysis, Machine Learning, Autonomous Driving

Abstract

This study conducts a scientometric analysis of global research output pertaining to driving behaviour and road safety from 2000 to 2025, with the objective of delineating thematic evolution, impactful contributions, and institutional productivity. Bibliographic metadata were extracted from the Scopus and Web of Science databases and subjected to analysis to examine publication trends, keyword co-occurrence networks, citation patterns, and research productivity metrics. A total of 2,211 publications were retained for analysis following pre-processing and duplicate removal procedures. The results demonstrate a discernible increase in scholarly output post-2010, with publication activity in Scopus increasing from fewer than 50 documents annually prior to 2010 to approximately 175 by 2025, indicate a substantial growth within the field. Journal articles constitute the predominant publication type, followed by conference papers and review articles, thereby underscoring the central role of peer-reviewed dissemination. Prominent publication venues include Accident Analysis & Prevention, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, and Traffic Injury Prevention, while emerging trends are evident in technology-oriented sources. Keyword analysis reveals that established themes such as distraction, risk perception, and driving performance continue to exert influence on the field, alongside increasing emphasis on machine learning, autonomous driving, and decision making. Highly cited works by Anstey et al. (2005), Fuller (2005), and Ulleberg and Rundmo (2003) remain foundational to the intellectual structure of the domain. Institutional analysis identifies Tsinghua University, Tongji University, and Changan University as leading contributors, with augmented contributions from other Chinese, European, and Australian institutions. In summary, the findings suggest a maturing and increasingly interdisciplinary research landscape, characterized by enhanced integration of behavioral science, intelligent transportation systems, and data-driven safety modelling approaches.

References

Abdullah, K. H. (2022). Publication trends in biology education: A bibliometric review of 63 years. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.131

Abdullah, K. H., & Sofyan, D. (2023). Machine learning in safety and health research: A scientometric analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 21(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2022.1977763.0

Abdulwahid, S. N., Mahmoud, M. A., Zaidan, B. B., Alamoodi, A. H., Garfan, S., Talal, M., & Zaidan, A. A. (2022). A comprehensive review on the behaviour of motorcyclists: Motivations, issues, challenges, substantial analysis and recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063552

Ameksa, M., Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., & Elamrani Abou Elassad, Z. (2020). Toward flexible data collection of driving behaviour. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 4443, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLIV-4-W3-2020-332020

Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Liu, Y., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2014). What makes articles highly cited. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 152–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2013.10.

Babojelić, K., & Novačko, L. (2020). Modelling of driver and pedestrian behaviour – A historical review. PrometTraffic & Transportation, 32(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.7307/PTT.V32I5.3524

Bian, Y., Lee, C. H., Zhao, J. L., & Wan, Y. (2019). A deep learning based model for driving risk assessment. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.158

Bin-Nun, A. Y., Derler, P., Mehdipour, N., & Duintjer Tebbens, R. J. (2022). How should autonomous vehicles drive? Policy, methodological, and social considerations for designing a driver. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01286-

Chen, S., Cheng, K.-T., Yang, J., Zhang, X., & Luo, Q. (2023). Driving behavior risk measurement and cluster analysis driven by vehicle trajectory data. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5675. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095675

Cohen, T., & Jones, P. B. (2020). Technological advances relevant to transport – understanding what drives them.

Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice, 135, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2020.03.

Corben, B., Peiris, S., & Mishra, S. (2022). The importance of adopting a safe system approach—Translation of principles into practical solutions. Sustainability, 14(5), 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052559

Cordellieri, P., Sdoia, S., Ferlazzo, F., Sgalla, R., & Giannini, A. M. (2019). Driving attitudes, behaviours, risk perception and risk concern among young student car-drivers, motorcyclists and pedestrians in various EU countries. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2019.07.

Crayton, T., & Meier, B. M. (2017). Autonomous vehicles: Developing a public health research agenda to frame the future of transportation policy. Journal of Transport and Health, 6, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2017.04.

Davey, J. D., & Freeman, J. E. (2011). Improving road safety through deterrence-based initiatives: A review of research. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 11(1), 29–37. https://journals.squ.edu.om/index.php/squmj/article/download/1543/1495

Dutta, U. (2020). A data driven approach to identify the contributing factors of traffic death in low, middle, and highincome countries. Global Journal of Engineering Sciences, 5(3), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.33552/GJES.2020.05.000613

Farooq, D., & Moslem, S. (2019). Evaluation and ranking of driver behavior factors related to road safety by applying analytic network process. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 48(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPTR.13037

Fitriani. (2023). Research trends on smart transportation policy in Asia and Europe: A biblioetric analysis. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 14(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.18196/jsp.v14i2.316

Huang, R., Liu, H., Ma, H., Qiang, Y., Pan, K., Gou, X., Wang, X., Ye, D., Wang, H., & Glowacz, A. (2022). Accident prevention analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field. Sustainability, 14(14), 8784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148784

Jafarpour, S., & Rahimi-Movaghar, V. (2014). Determinants of risky driving behavior: A narrative review. The Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran, 28(1), 142. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/14065490/4322337.pdf?sequence=

Kochetova, T. (2022). The Patterns of Drivers’ Traffic Behavior: Evidence from three countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869029

Kothuri, S., Nivedita, V., P, P., Dharmateja, M., Chinnaraj, A., & Sachidananda, K. (2023). Enhancing pedestrian safety in autonomous vehicles through machine learning. 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks and Application (ICSCNA), 1587-1592. https://doi.org/10.1109/icscna58489.2023.10370173.

Li, M., & Lee, J. (2023). Modeling car-following behavior with different acceptable safety levels. Sustainability, 15(7), 6282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076282

Li, M., Wang, W., Liu, Z., Qiu, M., & Qu, D. (2022). Driver behavior and intention recognition based on wavelet denoising and bayesian theory. Sustainability, 14(11), 6901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116901

Luke, R. (2023). Current and future trends in driver behaviour and traffic safety scholarship: An African research agenda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4290. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054290

Lv, K., Pei, X., Chen, C., & Xu, J. (2022). A safe and efficient lane change decision-making strategy of autonomous driving based on deep reinforcement learning. Mathematics, 10(9), 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091551. Md Isa, Z., Ismail, N. H., Ismail, R., Mohd Tamil, A., Jaafar, M. H., Mat Nasir, N., Miskan, M., Zainol Abidin, N.,

Ab Razak, N. H., & Yusof, K. H. (2022). Assessing factors associated with non-fatal injuries from road traffic accidents among Malaysian adults: A cross-sectional analysis of the PURE Malaysia study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148246

Mechernene, A., Judalet, V., Chaibet, A., & Boukhnifer, M. (2022). Detection and risk analysis with lane-changing decision algorithms for autonomous vehicles. Sensors, 22(21), 8148. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218148.

Mignot, D. (2017). Topical collection on human factors and safety. European Transport Research Review, 9(3), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12544-017-0261-

Münst, W. (2020). Prediction of driver behavior and decision strategies for autonomous driving: Using machine learning and decision theory [Dissertation, FernUniversität in Hagen]. https://ub-deposit.fernunihagen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/mir_derivate_00002080/Diss_Muenst_Prediction_2020.pdf

Othman, K. (2022). Exploring the implications of autonomous vehicles: A comprehensive review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 7(165), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00763-

Radzi, E. M., Abd Aziz, F. S., & Abdullah, K. H. (2024). The interrelation between happiness and workplace safety: A bibliometric review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(7), 2024145-2024145. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024145

Radzi, E. M., Hassan, Z., Ismail, M. A., Abdul Wahab, M. S., Armawai, M.A., Razak, W.Z.W.A (2025). Understanding sensation seeking in driving and its impact on road safety: An integrated scientometric and scoping review. Social Security Management Journal, 2 (2), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.32890/ssmj2025.2.2.

Radzi, E. M., Hassan, Z., Ismail, M. I., Rahmat. A. K (2026). Understanding military driving behaviour: A scientometric and scoping review of global research trends and gaps. Journal of Technology and Operations Management, 21(1), 55-75.https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2026.21.1.

Rahman, M. M., Islam, Md. K., & Al-Shayeb, A. (2022). Towards sustainable road safety in Saudi Arabia: Exploring traffic accident causes associated with driving behavior using a bayesian belief network. Sustainability, 14(10), 6315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106315

Rezapur-Shahkolai, F., Taheri, M., Etesamifard, T., Roshanaei, G., & Shirahmadi, S. (2020). Dimensions of aberrant driving behaviors and their association with road traffic injuries among drivers. PLOS ONE, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0238728

Ruiz-Rosero, J., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., Williams, J. M., Liu, H., Khanna, R., & Pisharody, G. (2017). Internet of things: A scientometric review. Symmetry, 9(12), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120301

Shah, S. A. R., Ahmad, N., Shen, Y., Pirdavani, A., Basheer, M. A., & Brijs, T. (2018). Road safety risk assessment: An analysis of transport policy and management for low-, middle-, and high-income Asian countries. Sustainability, 10(2), 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10020389

Singleton, P. A., De Vos, J., Heinen, E., & Pudane, B. (2020). Potential health and well-being implications of autonomous vehicles. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, 5, 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/BS.ATPP.2020.02.

Stefanidis, K. B., Davey, B., Truelove, V., Schiemer, C., & Freeman, J. E. (2022). Does exposure to social media content influence attitudes towards, and engagement in, road rule violations? A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0275335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275335

Stephens, A. N., Trawley, S., Ispanovic, J., & Lowrie, S. (2022). Self-reported changes in aggressive driving within the past five years, and during COVID-19. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272422

Topolšek, D., Babić, D., & Fiolić, M. (2019). The effect of road safety education on the relationship between driver’s errors, violations and accidents: Slovenian case study. European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12544-019-0351-Y Toriumi, A., Abu-Lebdeh, G., Alhajyaseen, W. K. M., Christie, N., Gehlert, T., Mehran, B., Mussone, L., Shawky,

A., Tang, K., & Nakamura, H. (2022). A multi-country survey for collecting and analyzing facts related to road traffic safety: Legislation, enforcement, and education for safer drivers. Iatss Research, 46(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.01.

Xu, J., Guo, K., & Sun, P. Z. H. (2022a). Driving performance under violations of traffic rules: Novice vs. experienced drivers. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 7(4), 908–917. https://doi.org/10.1109/tiv.2022.3200592

Xu, Y., Chen, M., Yang, R., Wumaierjiang, M., & Huang, S. (2022b). Global, regional, and national burden of road injuries from 1990 to 2019. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416479

Yang, K., Li, B., Shao, W., Tang, X., Liu, X., & Wang, H. (2023). Prediction failure risk-aware decision-making for autonomous vehicles on signalized intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24, 12806-12820. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2023.3288507.

Yang, K., Li, S., Chen, Y., Cao, D., & Tang, X. (2025). Towards safe decision-making for autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 74, 3830-3842. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2024.3488749.

Zhou, Z., Huang, H., Li, B., Zhao, S., Mu, Y., & Wang, J. (2024). SafeDrive: Knowledge- and data-driven risksensitive decision-making for autonomous vehicles with large language models. Accident Analysis Prevention, 224, 108299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108299