Philosophy and Teaching Methods of Chinese Character Literacy Education Based on the Application Concept of Paleography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2023.5.4Kata kunci:
Chinese character teaching, literacy teaching, ancient characters, pedagogyAbstrak
The reform and practice of the Chinese character literacy teaching method based on the concept of paleography application can be
employed to a certain extent and thus will improve the quality of Chinese character literacy teaching. This paper discusses the necessity and feasibility of applying ancient characters to Chinese character literacy teaching, discusses the epistemological and methodological issues of Chinese character literacy teaching, and expounds five teaching methods for the application of ancient characters to Chinese character literacy teaching, including didactic teaching method, case teaching method, theme-based teaching method, situational teaching method, and comprehensive teaching method. Different teaching methods are the deconstruction of Chinese character teaching goals, highlighting teaching objectives and priorities from different levels. They are not isolated and separated from each other, and teachers can actively choose and use teaching methods under the guidance of teaching objectives at different stages.
Rujukan
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2020). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Book 1, Cognitive domain. Longman.
Chen, M. (2006). Chinese Philology. M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Comenius, J. A. (2014). The Great Didactic (Vol. 2, pp. 139-144). (R. G. Fu, Trans.). Beijing: Education Science Press.
Ho, K. (1997). Constructivist teaching mode, teaching method and instructional design. Journal of Beijing Normal University (So-cial Science Edition), 5, 74-81.
Hu, D. (2005). Historical, cultural and practical reflections on the teaching theory of constructivism. Comparative Education Review, 2, 24-28.
Huang, D. (2019). Paleography. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.
Jiang, B. (2017). Research on pedagogical models of participatory pedagogy. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 1, 165-167. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2017.01.048.
Qian, M. (2011). Cultural Studies. Beijing: Jiuzhou Publishing House.
Qiu, X. (2013). Outline of Philology (Revised). Beijing: The Com-mercial Press.
Russell. (1976). History of Western Philosophy (Volume II) (Y. Ma, Trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Sato, M. (2001). Teaching Principle (Q. Zhong Trans.). Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House. Practitioner Research, 5, July 2023 pp: 83-
Wang, L. (2011). Research on Teaching Method Reform from the Per-spective of Knowledge View (Doctoral dissertation, East China Normal University).
Wang, N. (2002). Principles of Chinese Character Teaching and Sci-entific Application of Various Teaching Methods (Part I). Cur-riculum, Teaching Material and Method, (10), 1-5. http://doi.org/10.19877/j.cnki.kcjcjf.2002.10.001
Wen, P., & Jia, G. (2002). Constructivist theory and teaching reform: A review of constructivist learning theory. Theory and Practice of Education, 5, 17-22.
Wu, C., & Chu, J. (2020). Rationalism, constructivism and the study of teachers’ teaching expertise: A critical discussion of contex-tual empiricism. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 8, 34-41.
Xu, G. (1988). Is language a system of arbitrary signs? The theory reconsidered. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3, 2-10+79.
Xu, S. (2013). Speak and understand words (H. Seo, Narr.). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Yu, S. (2010). Oracle bone script Shilin. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Zeng, W. (2022). How assessment could improve learning——on the symbolic and social media of learning-oriented assessment. Global Education, 11, 120-128.
Zheng, J. (2002). Case teaching: A new approach to teacher profes-sional development. Theory and Practice of Education, 7, 36-41.
Zhong, Q. (2017). Teaching methodology: Interpretation of concepts. Educational research, 38(1), 95-105.
Zhou, X. (2003). Outline of Modern Western Epistemology: Rational-ism and Empiricism. Philosophical Research, 10, 48-53.
Zhu. Y. (2002). On the arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 2-7+80.
