The Benefits of Learning Management System (LMS) in Facilitating the TESL Teacher Trainees’ Learning

Pengarang

  • Umazah Omar Institut Pendidikan Guru Darul Aman (IPDA), Kedah, Malaysia
  • Aizan Yaacob School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2020.2.6

Kata kunci:

Learning Management System, second language acquisition, TESL, principles of learning

Abstrak

Learning Management System (LMS) is becoming an important platform for university students. The use of LMS in teaching and learning process which focuses on the content subject has provided a wider opportunity for the TESL teacher trainees not only to apprehend the content but also to apply them in real life contexts. The study aims to unveil the usefulness of LMS in TESL teacher trainees’ learning of the content subject which is Second Language Acquisition (SLA). 15 participants (12 female, and 3 male) from one of the Teacher Training Institutes in the northern region of Malaysia participated in this qualitative case study. Participants were asked to write their personal reflections after each interaction using LMS. 15 weeks of classroom interactions were recorded for analysis. Participants had to write their reflections based on Pre-Class, While-Class and Post-Class Sessions. The findings were analyzed thematically based on the Seven Principles of Learning. The findings indicated that the participants were able to set their target in learning, they were aware of their learning styles, improved their skills and became more engaged in classroom activities. This study depicts the role of LMS in facilitating successful learning. It suggests that practitioners need to maximize the use of LMS for successful teaching and learning.

Rujukan

Aggilanda Easwary Muruthy & Mat Yamin, F. (2017). The perception and effectiveness of learning management system (LMS) usage among the higher education students. Journal of Technology and Operations Management, 12 (1), 86-98, June 2017. ISSN 2590-4175. Available at: <http://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index. php/jtom/article/view/9456>. Date accessed: 16 ug. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.9456.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V, (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

Bruning, R.H., Schraw, G.J., & Norby, M. M. (2011). Cognitive Psychology and instruction (5th Edition). Boston: Pearson.

Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information. SAGE: Cleveland

Creswell, J. (2009) (2nd Ed). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London: Sage Publication Inc.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). London: Sage Publication Inc.

Dutton, W. H., Cheong, P. H. & Park, N. (2003). The social shaping of a virtual learning environment: The case of a universitywide course management system. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 2 (1). Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/ volume-2/vol2-issue1-art3-dutton-cheong-park.pdf

Gonzales, N., Moll, L.C. & Amanti, C. (2005). Fund of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households and classrooms. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Koszalka, T.A., & Ganesan, R. (2004). Designing online course: Taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course management systems (CMS) in distance education. Distance Education, 25 (2), 243-256.

Lee Yen Chaw & Chun Meng Tang. (2013). Readiness for blended learning: Understanding attitudes of university students. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 6 (2), 79-100.

Moll, L.C. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31 (2), 132-141.

Ministry of Education. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 20152025 (Higher Education).

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of the case study research. In Cohen,

I., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th Ed.). London: Routledge.

Trakakis, A. (2011). ENSPIRAL-Enhanced solution for project and interactive research-based applied learning, IQ2, March 2011.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Weibell, C.J. (2011). Principles of learning: A conceptual framework for domain-specific theories of learning. Received from: https://scholararchive.byu.edu.

West, R.E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C.R. (2007). Understanding the experience of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55 (1),1-25. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9018-1.

Woolfolk, H.A. (2013). Education Psychology (12th Ed.). Toronto, CA: Pearson.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research, design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Diterbitkan

2020-09-06

Cara Memetik

Omar, U., & Yaacob, A. (2020). The Benefits of Learning Management System (LMS) in Facilitating the TESL Teacher Trainees’ Learning. Practitioner Research, 2, 103-119. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2020.2.6