Empowering Children Through Circle Time: An Intervention to Promote Language Interaction in Primary ESL Classroom in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2019.1.14Keywords:
circle time, language interaction, second language, primary schoolAbstract
As Malaysian English curriculum changes in accordance to the needs and demands of education all across the world, so must the teaching of English as the second language (L2) in Malaysian schools. Every year there are many approaches and innovations introduced to the community of educators to cater to these changes and amongst many is the use of Circle Time. This paper investigates the use of Circle Time in supporting ESL pupils’ language interactions in classroom by looking at the types and frequencies of language interactions that occur during lessons. This is to determine if Circle Time is indeed beneficial in supporting second language interaction in the classroom. Classroom observations were conducted on two classes of Year Three which utilized Circle Time. Besides the frequency, the kind of interactions that occurred during Circle Time were also observed using an observation checklist. Lastly, two English teachers were interviewed to find out their perspectives on the implementation. Findings of this study showed that there were trends in the frequency of seven of the types of language interaction that occurred during Circle Time. Besides, the interviewed teachers identified two advantages of Circle Time on their pupils’ interactions and to sum up, Circle Time is a suitable intervention strategy to promote language interactions of English as a Second Language among Malaysian primary schools.
References
Angrosino, M. (2005). Recontextualizing observation: Ethnography, pedagogy, and the prospects for a progressive political agenda. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Atieno, O. P. (2009). An analysis of strengths and limitation of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, 13-18.
Barton, E., Reichow, B., Wolery, M., & Chen, C. (2011). We can all participate! Adapting circle time for children with Autism. Young Exceptional Children, 14(2), 2-21.
Bruce, S., Fasy, C., Gulick, J., Jones, J., & Pike, E. (2006). Making morning circle meaningful. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 2(4), 2-17.
Clifford, A. (2010). Teaching restorative practices with classroom circles. San Francisco: Centre for Restorative Process.
Collier, rdC. (2016). Classroom language interaction checklist (3 Edition). Washington: Cross-Cultural Educational Services.
Collins, B. (2011). Empowering children through circle time: An illumination of practice. A thesis in educational doctorate (PhD thesis). National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland.
Collins, B., & Kawanagh, A. M. (2013). Student teachers’ experiences of circle time: implications for Practice. Dublin, Ireland: St Patrick’s College of Education, Dublin City University.
Collins, B., & Kawanagh, A. M. (2015). Circle time as an inclusive learning space: exploring student teachers’ prior school experiences. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 7(2), 18111–18115.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, nd Mixed Methods Approaches (2 Ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Day, F. (2011). Circle time for social emotional learning. Educating Young Children - Learning and Teaching in The Early Childhood Years, 17(3), 33-34. in DfES (2005) Excellence and Enjoyment: Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL)
Dodiya, P., Kapadiya, J., & Malyavaniya, M. (2014). Classroom observation: A critical analysis of different methods. Conference Paper.
Dolzhykova, O. (2014). Teaching English through storytelling to young learners: Ukrainian and Norwegian experiences. Master Thesis: University of Oslo.
Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? London: Bloombury.
Glazzard, J. (2016). The value of circle time as an intervention strategy. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6(2),207-215.
Hall, J. K. (2003). Classroom Interaction and Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186-203.
Harwell, M. R. (2011). Research design on qualitative/ quantitative/ mixed methods. In Conrad, C. F. & Serlin, R. C. (Eds.) (2011). The Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas nd as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (2 ed.). California: SAGE Publication Inc.
Holtzhausen, S. (2001). Triangulation as a powerful tool to strengthen the qualitative research design: The Resource-based Learning Career Preparation Programme (RBLCPP) as a case study. A paper presented at Higher Education Close Up Conference 2, Lancaster University on 16-18 July 2001.
Jennings, L., Gandarilla, M., & Tan, P. P. (2015). Using the Native American talking circle: Experiential learning on ethnic and cultural diversity of South California. Groupwork, 25(1), 58-77.
Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection. Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art.43.
Kent County Council.(2017). Circle time: A whole school approach.
Krull, S. W. (2017). Teaching tips for successful circle times. ACT Project.
Lewis, G. (2003). Teaching and learning in circle. Conflict management in Higher Education Report, 3(2), 1-17.
Lim, H. L., Wun, T. Y. & Chew, C. M. (2014). Enhancing Malaysian teachers‟ assessment literacy. International Education Studies, 7(10), 74-81.
McCartney, K. & Lanphar, E. (2015). The impact of involvement in circle time. social and emotional awareness of learners diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Teach Collection of Christian Education, 1(1), 24-37.
Md Sidhur Rahman. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language testing and assessment research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102-112.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2021 (preschool-post-secondary education. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Mohamad Abed. (2014). Self-esteem: Enhancing good practices and overcoming barriers. Life Science Journal, 11(10), 24-33.
Mosley, J. (1996). Quality circle time. Cambridge: LDA
Mosley, J. (2006). Step-by-step guide to circle time for seal. UK: Positive Press.
Mosley, J. (2016). Circle time and socio-emotional competence in children and young people. In Cefal, C., & Cooper, P. (Eds). Promoting Emotional Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Mosley, J., & Niwano, Z. (2007). They’re driving me mad: Running circles on support for children whose behaviour pushes you beyond your limit. Cambridge: LDA
Obie, M. D. (2016). Integrating modified talking circle to create culturally relevant frameworks. A thesis in educational degree (Master‟s thesis). Humboldt State University.
Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In Holborn, M. (Ed.). Developments in Sociology. Ormskirk: Causeway Press.
Onge, J., & Eitel, K. (2017). Increasing active participation and engagement of students in circle formations. Journal for Teacher Research, 19(1), 1-10.
Palinkas, L., Horwits, S. Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan,. N. & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Policy Mental Health, 42 (5), 533-544.
Park, L. (2014). Circle time: Making large group activities work. Texas Child Care Quarterly, 38(2), 4-9.
Roffey, S., & McCarthy, F. (2013). Circle solutions, a philosophy and pedagogy for learning positive relationship: What promotes and inhibits sustainable outcomes?. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 5(1), 36-55.
Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749-752.
Siti Noor Fauziah, A. R., & Nik Suryani, A. R. (2014). Children interaction patterns exhibited during learning activities: A case study at a selected public kindergarten in Malaysia. E-Journal of Social Science Research, 184-207.
Stephens, C., Ascencio, R., Burgos, A. Diaz, T., Montenegro, M., & Valenzuela, C. (2012). Film circles: Scaffolding speaking for EFL students. English Teaching Forum, 2, 14-20.
Toth, P. (2011). Social and cognitive factors in making teacher-led classroom discourse relevant for second language development. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 1-25.
Winters, A. (2017). Using talking circles in the classroom. Heartland Community College Publication.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC, 37(3). 308-328.
Wu, L., & Lang, P. (2011). Introducing circle time in a Chinese middle school: A response to the current needs of education in China? Asian Journal of Counselling, 18(1&2) 95-124.
