Students’ Choice Intention of a Higher Learning Institution : An Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)

Pengarang

  • T. Ramayah School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Aizzat Mohd Nasurdin School of Management Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd Nasser Mohd Noor School of Management Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Hajemi Hassan School of Management Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2003.7.1.4

Abstrak

The purpose of the present study is to identify the determinants of upper secondary level students’ intentions whether to choose a private or a public higher learning institution. Ajzen and Fishbein’s (1980) Theory of Reasoned Action was used as the basis for this study. The theory posits that the immediate determinant of behavior is intention. Intention is determined by the weighted attitude toward the behavior and the weighted subjective norm. Combinations of beliefs, evaluations, and motivation to comply determine attitude and subjective norm towards behavior. Salient beliefs related to attitude towards both private and public institutions of higher learning and salient beliefs related to the subjective norm for both private and public higher learning institutions were identified. The sample consisted of 132 students whose age ranges from 16 years to 24 years. Hypotheses generated in accordance to the theory were confirmed. The findings also showed that attitude toward behavior and subjective norm explained 75% of the variance in behavioral intention for both private and public institutions of higher learning. Attitude toward behavior had a greater relative weight (β =0.539) compared to the subjective norm (β =0.401) for both private and public higher learning institutions. Implications of the above findings are discussed.

 

Muat turun

Muat turun data belum tersedia.

Rujukan

Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., &

Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, New York:Prentice-Hall.

Absher, K., & Crawford, G. (1996). Marketing the community college starts with understanding students’ perspectives, Community College Review, 23(4), 59-68.

Ahmat, S. (1980). Nation building and the university in developing countries: The case of Malaysia, Journal of Higher Education, 9, 721-724.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.

Assael, H. (1992). Consumer Behavior & Marketing Action, Massachusetts:PWS-Kent Publishing Company.

Brown, K. G. (1991). “Postsecondary Plan of High-School seniors in 1972 and 1980: Implications for Student Quality”, Denver: Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. ED 220 060. 25 pp, MF-01.

Fishbein, M., & Coombs, F. S. (1974). Basis for decision: an attitudinal analysis of voting behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4 (2), 95-124.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior : An Introduction to Theory and Research, Philippines:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Gilmour, J. E. Jr., Dolich, I. J., & Spiro, L. M. (1978). “How College Students Select a College”, Houston: Paper presented to the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, ED 208 705. 39 pp. MF-01.

Holland, J. L. (1958). Student explanations of college choice and their relation to college productivity, and sex differences, College and University, 33, 313-320.

Hossler, D. (1984). Enrolment management: an integrated approach, The College Board: Washington, DC. Malaysian Management Journal 7 (1), 47-62 (2003) http://mmj.uum.edu.my

Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policy makers, College and University, 2(3), 207-221.

Litten, L. M. (1982). Different strokes in the applicant pool: Some refinements in a model of student college choice, Journal of Higher Education, 53(4), 383-402.

Jackson, G. A. (1982). Public efficiency and private choice in higher education, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(2), 237247.

Nalliah, M., & Thiyagarajah, R.,(1999). Malaysia: Review of Educational Events in 1998, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 19(2), 95102.

Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing Management, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

New Straits Times, (1998, July, 21).

New Straits Times, (1998, November, 29).

Kotler, P., & Andreasen, A. (1991). Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.

Kotler, P., & Fox, K. (1985). Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.

Lewis, G., & Morrison, S. (1975). “A Longitudinal Study of College Selection. Technical Report No. 2”, Mimeograph, Pittsburgh: School of Urban and Public Affairs, CarnegieMellon University.

Lim, S. B. (2001). An Investigation of Penang’s Resident Perception and Attitudes Towards Gambling Activities and Industry, Unpublished MBA thesis, Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Litten, L. H., & Brodigan, D. I. (1982). “On Being Heard in a Noisy World: Matching Media and Messages in College Marketing.”, College and University, 57(3): 242-263.

Litten, L. H., Sullivan, D., & Brodigan, D. L. (1983). Applying Marketing Research in College Admissions, New York: College Entrance Examination Board

Nunally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Quah, B. S. (2000). Consumer Choice Behavior. A Study of Consumer Choice Preference on Infant Formula. Unpublished MBA thesis, Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. (1994). Consumer Behavior, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.

Sheppard, B., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A MetaAnalysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-340.

Stanley, G., & Reynolds, P. (1994). The relationship between students’ level of school achievement, their preferences for future enrolment and their images of universities, Journal of Higher Education, 27, 85-93.

The Sun, (2000, January,16). Malaysian Management Journal 7 (1), 47-62 (2003)

Diterbitkan

2003-06-01

Cara Memetik

Ramayah, T., Mohd Nasurdin, A., Mohd Noor, M. N., & Hassan, H. (2003). Students’ Choice Intention of a Higher Learning Institution : An Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA). Malaysian Management Journal, 7(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2003.7.1.4

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.title##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.harvested## 2026-09-07
0 ##plugins.generic.citations.panel.citationsNone##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.body##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.identifiers## DOI 10.32890/mmj2003.7.1.4 OpenAlex W7071577177

Artikel yang paling banyak dibaca oleh pengarang yang sama