Institutional Shareholdings and Financial Characteristics of Malaysian Listed Companies

Pengarang

  • Shamsul Naharabdullah School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd Azlan Yahya School of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Faisol Elham School of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj1999.3.1.3

Abstrak

This study attempts to investigate the extent to which the financial characteristics of firms are related to institutional shareholdings. The primary motivation to carry out the study comes from an earlier paper by Hessel and Norman (1992), which showed that seven financial ratios discriminated between strongly-held and institutionally-neglected firms. As an extension of the study, the present study seeks to investigate the seven financial ratios among Malaysian companies by identifying differences in the means of the seven ratios between a group of companies with substantial institutional shareholdings against another group of companies with negligible institutional shareholdings. The findings, from a sample of KLSE listed companies, broadly support the findings by Hessel and Norman (1992), in which firms with significant institutional shareholdings exhibited a significantly higher profitability ratio against firms that were neglected by institutional investors.. This suggested that institutional investors placed greater emphasis on a firm's short-term results. Our evidence also did not indicate institutional shareholders' direct involvement in ensuring a firm's long-term growth and competitiveness, as shown by the insignificant differences in the mean of growth ratio between firms that had significant institutional shareholdings and those that were neglected by institutional investors.

 

Muat turun

Muat turun data belum tersedia.

Rujukan

Aoki, M. (1984). The Cooperative Game Theory of the Firm, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ball, J., Sir (1991). Short Termism - Myth or Reality?, National Westminster Bank Quar-terly Review, August: 20-30.

Baysinger, B. D., Rita D. Kosnik & Turk, T. A. (1991). The Effects of Board and Own-ership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 34 (1): March: 205-214.

Cready, W. M. (1994). Determinants of Rela-tive Investor Demand for Common Stocks, JournalofAccounting, Auditingand Finance, 9 (3) Summer: 487-509. Dobrzynski, J. H., Schiller, Z., Miles, G. L.,

Norman, J.R. & King, R. W (1986). More Than Ever, It’s Management for Short Term, Business Week, November, 92-93

Drucker, P. F. (1986). To End the Raiding Roulette Game, Across the Board, 23 (4): 30-Malaysian Management Journal 3 (1), 39-49 (1999)

Eakin, S. (1993). Institutional Investor Support of Managers: An Investigation of Tender Offers, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 32 (3) Summer: 75-84

Gopalakrishnan, V. & Parkash, M. (1995). Bor-rower and Lender Perceptions of Ac-counting Information in Corporate Lending Agreements, Accounting Hon-zons, 9 (1) March: 13-26. > Gilson, R. J. & Kraakman, R. (1991). Reinvest-ing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Investors, Stanford Law Re a view, 43: 863-906. —)

Graves, S. B. (1988). Institutional Ownership TO and Corporate R&D in the Computer Industry, Academy of Management Journal, Q 31: 417-428.

Hansen, G. S. & Hill, C. W. L. (1991). Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time Series Study of Four Technology-Driven Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 1-16.

Hessel, C.A. & Norman, M. (1992). Financial Characteristics of Neglected and Institu-tionally Held Stocks, Journal of Account-ing, Auditing and Finance, 3 (3) Summer: 313-334 mj.uum - Jensen, M. C., (1991). Corporate Control and the Politics of Finance, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4 (2): 13-33. // a a

Q. Jensen, M. C., (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of In-htt ternal Control Systems, Journal ofFinanee, 48: 831-880.

Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.

Kochhar, R. & David, P. (1996). Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A Test of Competing Hypotheses, Strategic Man-agement Journal, 17: 73-84.

Mehran, H. (1992), Executive Incentive Plans, Corporate Control, and Capital Struc-ture, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (4) December: 539-560

Nussbaum, B. & Dobrzynski, J. H. (1987). The Battle for Corporate Control: Ma-nagement is Being Assailed From All Sides. Who is in Charge Here?, Business Week, May 18: 101-109.

Schipper, K. (1989).Commentary on Earnings Management, Accounting Horizons, 2, December: 91-102.

Diterbitkan

1999-06-01

Cara Memetik

Naharabdullah, S., Yahya, M. A., & Elham, F. (1999). Institutional Shareholdings and Financial Characteristics of Malaysian Listed Companies. Malaysian Management Journal, 3(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj1999.3.1.3

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.title##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.harvested## 2026-09-07
0 ##plugins.generic.citations.panel.citationsNone##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.body##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.identifiers## DOI 10.32890/mmj1999.3.1.3

Artikel yang paling banyak dibaca oleh pengarang yang sama