Enrichment of Systems Thinking for Problem Solving in Engineering Systems Using the Hermeneutic Loop: Case Studies for Designers in the Field of Remote Communication

Pengarang

  • Hamid Reza Fartookzadeh Faculty of Management and Industrial Engineering, Malek Ashtar University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Mahdi Fartookzadeh Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Malek Ashtar University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Majid Mokhtarianpour Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2024.28.3

Kata kunci:

Systems thinking, hermeneutic loop, problem solving, system design, remote communication, antenna design

Abstrak

The systems thinking approach to problem solving is a dynamic and productive approach. However, emphasizing only the objective aspects of a phenomena and neglecting their subjective aspects can decrease its problem solving power. In order to enhance the problem solving power of systems thinking, it is proposed in this article to enrich systems thinking by using the hermeneutic loop. This applied research adopts practical aspects of systems thinking and hermeneutics in understanding and solving problems more effectively. The proposed approach is comprised of an additive loop, named the hermeneutic loop, concerning simultaneously “the whole system and its parts” and “subjectively and objectively”. Requirements of systems thinking are highlighted involving the holism and life cycle of the system. A summary of the considerations for systems thinking regarding holism and lifetime are as follows: (1) feedback in lifetime, (2) feed forward, (3) combining human and tools, (4) resources, (5) stock and flow and (6) carrying capacity (saturation). The utilization of this enriched systems thinking is investigated in three real engineering design processes, including case studies for designers in the field of remote communication. As the result, the proposed enriched systems thinking provides an improved understanding of the whole, which improves the solving power of the designers of components, and adds subjective product design to the objective design.

Muat turun

Muat turun data belum tersedia.

Rujukan

Ali, A., Farooq, W., & Khalid, M. A. (2020). The relationship between organizational climate for innovation and innovative work behavior: Mediating role of employee engagement in Pakistan. Malaysian Management Journal, 24, 195-218. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj.24.2020.8776

Azizi, W. N. E. W., Ahmad, S. F., & Tey, Y. S. (2023). Effects of extended value chain activities on profit efficiency in Malaysian plantation companies. Malaysian Management Journal, 27, 109-134. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2023.27.5

Badham, R., Bridgman, T., & Cummings, S. (2020). The organizationas-iceberg as a counter-metaphor. Historical Organization Studies: Theory and Applications, 57. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781003033592-4

Behl, D. V., & Ferreira, S. (2014). Systems thinking: An analysis of key factors and relationships. Procedia Computer Science, 36, 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045

Biswas, J., & Veloso, M. (2012, May). Depth camera based indoor mobile robot localization and navigation. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 1697-1702). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2012.6224766

Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., Powers, E., Solin, J., & Kushner, J. (2018). Applying systems thinking models of organizational design and change in community operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 932-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.006

Chen, H. T. (2016). Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis. Evaluation and program planning, 59, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. evalprogplan.2016.05.012 Eisenbart, B., Bouwman, S., Voorendt, J., McKillagan, S., Kuys, B., & Ranscombe, C. (2022). Implementing design thinking to drive innovation in technical design. International Journal of Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-Design Creativity and Innovation, 10(3), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2048698

Engel, J., Sturm, J., & Cremers, D. (2012, October). Camera-based navigation of a low-cost quadrocopter. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 2815-2821). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2012.6385458

Fartookzadeh, H. R., & Fartookzadeh, M. (2018). Value Engineering and Function Analysis: Frameworks for Innovation in Antenna Systems. Challenges, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe 9010020

Fartookzadeh, H. R., & Mokhtarianpour, M. (2014). Value engineering enriched by six sigma capabilities.” Int. J. Curr. Life Sci., 4, 107.

Fartookzadeh, M., & Armaki, S. M. (2016). Multi-band conical and inverted conical printed quadrifilar helical antennas with compact feed networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 70(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2015.09.018

Fartookzadeh, M., & Armaki, S. M. (2016, May). Wide-beam spiral antennas with multi-folded arms and compact feed networks for satellite application. In 2016 24th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) (pp. 1661-1666). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iraniancee.2016.7585788

Fartookzadeh, M., & Mohseni Armaki, S. H. (2016). Wide‐beam spiral antenna with three folded arms fed by compact three‐way Wilkinson power divider. Electronics Letters, 52(8), 587-588. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2015.3404

Fartookzadeh, M., & Mohseni Armaki, S. H. (2018). Printed quadrifilar square‐helical antennas with folded arms for satellite applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 12(11), 1780-1785. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2017.1020

Fartookzadeh, M., Armaki, S. H. M., Razavi, S. M. J., & RashedMohassel, J. (2016). Optimum functions for radial wires of monopole antennas with arbitrary elevation angles. Radioengineering, 25(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.13164/re.2016.0053 Fartookzadeh, M., Mohseni Armaki, S. H., Razavi, S. M. J., &

Rashed-Mohassel, J. (2014). Fast method for the calculation of radiation resistance of a catenary element antenna applied to the optimization of a Loran transmitter antenna and a scaled model fabrication. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 28(9), 1044-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205 071.2014.904757 Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-Fartookzadeh, M., Mohseni Armaki, S. H., Razavi, S. M. J., &

Rashed-Mohassel, J. (2015). Modification of square top loaded low-frequency antennas with investigations on catenary networks analysis. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 29(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2014.981643 Fartookzadeh, M., Mohseni Armaki, S.H., Razavi, S.M.J., Yavari, E., &

Rashed-Mohassel, J. (2015). Design and Fabrication of Square Top-Loaded Monopole Antenna as the Loran Transmitter with Four Masts. Journal of Applied Electromagnetics, 3(1), 33-39. (in Persian) https://www.magiran.com/paper/1613133?lang=en Fartookzadeh, M., Mohseni, A. S. H., Razavi, S. M. J., & Rashed, M.

J. (2014). Coupling effects and performance of loran transmitter antennas. JCE: Journal of Communication Engineering, 3(2), 81-94. https://jce.shahed.ac.ir/article_323.html

François, C. (1999). Systemics and cybernetics in a historical perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 16(3), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)10991743(199905/06)16:3%3C203::aid-sres210%3E3.0.co;2-1 Freeman, M., DeMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St. Pierre,

E. A. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x06298009

Gates, E. F. (2016). Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.004

Geniusas, S., & Fairfield, P. (Eds.). (2020). Hermeneutics and phenomenology: Figures and themes. Bloomsbury Publishing.

George, T. (2021) Hermeneutics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

Godfrey, Patrick, R. Deakin Crick., & Shaofu Huang. (2014). Systems thinking, systems design and learning power in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30 (1), 112-127 https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/ systems-thinking-systems-design-and-learning-power-inengineering

Grewal, M. S., Andrews, A. P., & Bartone, C. G. (2020). Global navigation satellite systems, inertial navigation, and integration. John Wiley & Sons. Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-

Guy Boulton (2016), By turning medical scans into adventures, GE eases children’s fears, Journal Sentinel, available: http://archive.jsonline.com/business/by-turningmedical-scans-into-adventures-ge-eases-childrens-fearsb99647870z1-366161191.html/

Harris, R. (2015). The Hermeneutic loop: The existential foundation of the hero’s journey., available: www.yourheroicjourney.com/ the-hermeneutic-loop

Herndl, C. G., Fennell, B. A., & Miller, C. R. (1991). Understanding failures in organizational discourse: The accident at Three Mile Island and the shuttle Challenger disaster. Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities, 279-305. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/274510842

Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2013). Thinking systemically about complex systems. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.278

Ippolito Jr, L. J. (2017). Satellite communications systems engineering: atmospheric effects, satellite link design and system performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Jaaron, A. A., & Backhouse, C. J. (2017). Operationalising “doubleloop” learning in service organisations: A systems approach for creating knowledge. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30, 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9397-0

Jackson, M. C. (2003), Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.

Jackson, M. C. (2006). Creative holism: A critical systems approach to complex problem situations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 23(5), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sres.799

Jaradat, R. M., & Keating, C. B. (2016). Systems thinking capacity: Implications and challenges for complex system governance development. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 7(1-3), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/ ijsse.2016.076130

Johannessen, J. A. (2013). Innovation: A systemic perspective– developing a systemic innovation theory. Kybernetes, 42(8), 1195-1217. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-04-2013-0069

Johnson, R. C., & Jasik, H. (1984). Antenna engineering handbook (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Book. Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-

Kádárová, J., Kalafusová, L., & Durkáčová, M. (2014). Holistic system thinking as an educational tool using key indicators. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 180-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.383

Kelley, C. T. (1999). Iterative methods for optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Kodama, M. (2019). Business innovation through holistic leadership‐ developing organizational adaptability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(4), 365-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sres.2551

Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 3814788.2017.1375092

Lich, K. H., Urban, J. B., Frerichs, L., & Dave, G. (2017). Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems. Evaluation and program planning, 60, 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.008

Marples, D. R. (1988). The social impact of the Chernobyl disaster. Springer.

Moallem, M., & Sarabandi, K. (2013). Polarimetric study of MMW imaging radars for indoor navigation and mapping. IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation, 62(1), 500-504. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2013.2289354

Monat, J. P., & Gannon, T. F. (2015). What is systems thinking? A review of selected literature plus recommendations. American Journal of Systems Science, 4(1), 11-26. http://article.sapub. org/10.5923.j.ajss.20150401.02.html Muhammad, A., Putro, U. S., Siallagan, M., Kijima, K., & Wasesa,

M. (2021). System of Diagnostic Systems framework and its application to the disharmony in Indonesian national security. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(1), 3149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2656

Ngana, J. P. (2015). Management with a frame of mind for systemic thinking: A conceptual condition setting tool. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2257

Noor, J., Alhabshy, M. A., & Yaacob, M. R. (2018). Mediating Entrepreneurial Creativity-The Effect of Human Resource Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-Practices on Innovation. Malaysian Management Journal (MMJ), 22, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj.22.2018.9671

O’Kane, B. (2015). Advancing the creative development process with systems thinking and a developmental model for designers. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 12(sup1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2015.1077068

Olson, G., Pellegrino, S., Banik, J., & Costantine, J. (2013). Deployable helical antennas for CubeSats. In 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (p. 1671). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-1671

Palmer, K. D. (2009). Emergent Design: Explorations in Systems Phenomenology in Relation to Ontology, Hermeneutics and the Meta-Dialectics of Design. Hermeneutics and the Meta-Dialectics of Design (December 17, 2009). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1477214

Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637

Papantonopoulos, S. (2004). How system designers think: A study of design thinking in human factors engineering.Ergonomics, 47(14), 1528-1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401304123312 90916

Patel, S., & Mehta, K. (2017). Systems, design, and entrepreneurial thinking: Comparative frameworks. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30, 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213016-9404-5

Platzek, B. P., & Pretorius, L. (2020). Regional cooperation in a thriving entrepreneurial economy: A holistic view on innovation, entrepreneurship and economic development. International journal of innovation and technology management, 17(03), 2050014. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877020500145

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Competitive Intelligence Review, 1(1), 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781-349-11336-1_3

Saunders M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, Adrian. (2019). Research methods for business students. 8th ed. Italy: Pearson Education Limited.

Sharaiha, A., Terret, C., & Blot, J. P. (1997). Printed quadrifilar resonant helix antenna with integrated feeding network. Electronics Letters, 33(4), 256-257. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19970185 Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-

Shingo, S. (1986). Zero quality control: Source inspection and the poka-yoke system. CRC Press.

Siddique, Z. (2000). Common platform development: designing for product variety. Georgia Institute of Technology.

Singh, A., & Singla, A. R. (2021). Constructing definition of smart cities from systems thinking view. Kybernetes, 50(6), 19191950. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-05-2020-0276

Siriram, R. (2012). A soft and hard systems approach to business process management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1095

Spitas, C. (2011). Analysis of systematic engineering design paradigms in industrial practice: Scaled experiments. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(7), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09544820903437734

Stjepandić, J., Wognum, N., & Verhagen, W. J. (2015). Concurrent engineering in the 21st century. Foundations, developments and challenges. Springer.

Stroh, D. P. (2009). Leveraging grantmaking: Understanding the dynamics of complex social systems. The Foundation Review,1(3), 9. https://doi.org/10.4087/foundationreview-d-09-00037

Tomko, M., Nelson, J., Nagel, R. L., Bohm, M., & Linsey, J. (2017). A bridge to systems thinking in engineering design: An examination of students’ ability to identify functions at varying levels of abstraction. AI EDAM, 31(4), 535-549. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060417000439

Tsuruda, Y., Hanada, T., & van der Ha, J. C. (2009). QSAT: A lowcost design for 50kg class piggyback satellite. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Space Technology Japan, 7(ists26), Tf_7-Tf_12. https://doi.org/10.2322/tstj.7.tf_7

Vahidi, A., & Aliahmadi, A. (2019). Describing the necessity of multi-methodological approach for viable system model: Case study of viable system model and system dynamics multimethodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32, 1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9452-0

Vlăduţescu, Ş. (2018). Six steps of hermeneutical process at H.-G. Gadamer. Postmodern Openings, 9(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/26

Williams, D. T., Beasley, R., & Gibbons, P. M. (2013). Combining hard and soft system thinking: the development of a value Malaysian Management Journal, 28 (July) 2024, pp: 67-improvement model for a complex linear friction welding repetitive process (lfw-VIM). Procedia Computer Science, 16, 1007-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.106

Zamora, E. A. (2016). Value chain analysis: A brief review. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 5(2), 116-128. http://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2016.5.2.116

Diterbitkan

2024-07-31

Cara Memetik

Fartookzadeh, H. R., Fartookzadeh, M., & Mokhtarianpour, M. (2024). Enrichment of Systems Thinking for Problem Solving in Engineering Systems Using the Hermeneutic Loop: Case Studies for Designers in the Field of Remote Communication. Malaysian Management Journal, 28, 67-98. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2024.28.3

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.title##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.harvested## 2026-09-07
0 ##plugins.generic.citations.panel.citationsNone##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.body##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.identifiers## DOI 10.32890/mmj2024.28.3 OpenAlex W4401172738