Constructing a Competitiveness Index for States in Malaysia: A Panel Data Analysis

Pengarang

  • Chee Ann Lim School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia , Malaysia
  • Ku Azam Tuan Lonik School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia , Malaysia
  • Radziah Adam School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia , Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.1

Kata kunci:

Economic competitiveness, social competitiveness, environmental competitiveness, panel data, state competitiveness

Abstrak

This study investigated the competitiveness index of the fourteen states in Malaysia. It also examined various aspects of competitiveness among states and vital elements that might influence competitiveness by utilizing a three-level hierarchical indicator system encompassing economic, social and environmental factors. An equally weighted index was applied to scrutinize the three dimensions. The index output was based on 24 indicators across six components. The critical components were economic performance, economic structure, marketization and openness, social aspects, domestic security and environmental quality. This study also examined the relationship between the components of competitiveness and economic growth for states in Malaysia by using the panel data estimation approach; a method which utilised data sets for fourteen states over a period extending from 2005 to 2016. Data were then analysed using a panel data regression model. Overall, findings showed that Selangor, where Kuala Lumpur the national capital was situated, was the most competitive state. In 2016, Kuala Lumpur was the best performer in terms of economic performance, social aspects and environmental quality. It was also found that domestic security and environmental quality were significant determinants of economic growth, which had enhanced competitiveness among states in Malaysia. A state’s performance according to the three dimensions varied greatly as there were different factors of specializations for each state. This study has proposed that each state in the federation possessed a significant economic performance, as well as substantial social and environmental development to ensure and sustain their respective state of competitiveness.

Muat turun

Muat turun data belum tersedia.

Rujukan

Agency, C. I. D. A (2012). Indicators for sustainability: How cities are monitoring and evaluating their success (p. 84). Canada. https://cityprotocol.cat/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/AnnexB.-Indicators-for-Sustainability.pdf

Ahmad, A., Ali, S., & Ahmad, N. (2014). Crime and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from Pakistan. In

Ahmad, Arslan, Ali, Sharafat & Ahmad, Najid (2014). Crime and economic gowth in developing Ccountries: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(4), 31-41.

Bailey, N., Docherty, I., & Turok, I. (2002). Dimensions of city competitiveness: Edinburgh and Glasgow in a UK context. Urban Competitiveness: Policies for Dynamic Cities, 135-159.

Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.

Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban Sudies, 36(5-6), 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0042098993222

Button, K. (2002). City management and urban environmental indicators. Ecological Economics, 40(2), 217-233.

Chakravarty, S. R. (2001). The variance as a subgroup decomposable measure of inequality. Social Indicators Research, 53(1), 79-95.

Chiang, L. C. (2000). Strategies for safety and security in tourism: A conceptual framework for the Singapore hotel industry. Journal of Tourism Studies, 11(2), 44-52.

Deas, I., & Giordano, B. (2001). Conceptualising and measuring urban competitiveness in major English cities: An exploratory approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(8), 1411-1429. Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 1–

Detotto, C., & Otranto, E. (2010). Does crime affect economic growth? Kyklos, 63(3), 330-345.

Dou, W. Z., Li, G. P., Gan, Y. J., Wang, L. M., & Yang, K. Z. (2000). Urban competitive pattern and its changes in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 10(2), 105-112. Du, Q., Wang, Y., Ren, F., Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Wu, C., Li, L., & Shen,

Y. (2014). Measuring and analysis of urban competitiveness of Chinese provincial capitals in 2010 under the constraints of major function-oriented zoning utilizing spatial analysis. Sustainability, 6(6), 3374-3399.

Fatimah Yusof, Katiman Rostam, & Zikri Muhammad. (2008). Bandar berdaya saing vis-a-vis pembangunan bandar lestari: Suatu wacana tentang pembangunan bandar di Malaysia. GeografiaMalaysian Journal of Society and Space, 4(1), 85-98.

Goulas, E., & Zervoyianni, A. (2013). Economic growth and crime: Does uncertainty matter? Applied Economics Letters, 20(5), 420-427.

Greene, F. J., & Tracey, P., & Cowling, M. (2007). Recasting the city into city-regions: place promotion, competitiveness benchmarking and the quest for urban supremacy. Growth and Change, 38, 1–22.

Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hall, P., & Pfeiffer, U. (2013). Urban future 21: A global agenda for twenty-first century cities. Routledge.

Hitam, M. B., & Borhan, H. B. (2012). FDI, growth and the environment: Impact on quality of life in Malaysia. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 333-342.

Huggins, R. (2000). An index of competitiveness in the UK: Local, regional and global analysis. In L Lloyd-Reason and S Wall (Eds.), Dimensions of competitiveness: Issues and policies (pp. 163-182). Edward Elgar. IMD (International Institute for Management Development). (2003). The world competitiveness yearbook. International Institute for Management Development, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Jiang, Y., & Shen, J. (2013). Weighting for what? A comparison of two weighting methods for measuring urban competitiveness. Habitat International, 38, 167-174. Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 1–

Komninos N. (2000) Inteligent cities: Innovation, knowledge system and digital space. Spon Press.

Kresl, P. K., & Singh, B. (1999). Competitiveness and the urban economy: Twenty-four large US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 36(5/6), 1017–1027.

Li, F., Liu, X., Hu, D., Wang, R., Yang, W., Li, D., & Zhao, D. (2009). Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: A case study for China’s Jining City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90(3-4), 134-142. Marzukhi, M. A., Omar, D., Leh, O. L. H., Hamir, M. S., & Barghchi,

M. (2011). Malaysian urban indicators network: A sustainable development initiative in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 25(1), 77-83.

Mokthsim, N., & Salleh, K. O. (2014). Malaysia’s efforts toward achieving a sustainable development: Issues, challenges and prospects. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 299-307.

Ning, Y., & Tang. (2001). The concept of urban competitiveness and index system. Modern Urban Studies, 88(3), 19-22.

Pan, M., Widner, B., & Enomoto, C. E. (2012). Growth and crime in contiguous states of Mexico. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 24(1-2), 51-64.

Panayotou, T. (2016). Economic growth and the environment. The Environment in Anthropology, 140-148.

Porter, M. E. (1990). New global strategies for competitive advantage. Planning Review, 18(3), 4-14.

Rondinelli, D. A. (2001). Making metropolitan areas competitive and sustainable in the new economy. Journal of Urban Technology, 8(1), 1-21.

Schmidheiny, K., & Basel, U. (2011). Panel data: Fixed and random effects. Short Guides to Microeconometrics, 7(1), 2-7.

Scott, A., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 579-593.

Vega-Rosado, L. L. (2006). The international competitiveness of Puerto Rico using the Porter’s model. Journal JGC, 14(2), 95-111.

Webster, D., & Muller, L. (2000). Urban competitiveness assessment in developing country urban regions: The road forward. Urban Group, INFUD. The World Bank, Washington DC. Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 1–

Diterbitkan

2021-07-09

Cara Memetik

Lim , C. A., Tuan Lonik , K. A., & Adam , R. (2021). Constructing a Competitiveness Index for States in Malaysia: A Panel Data Analysis. Malaysian Management Journal, 25, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.1

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.title##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.harvested## 2026-09-07
0 ##plugins.generic.citations.panel.citationsNone##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.body##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.identifiers## DOI 10.32890/mmj2021.25.1 OpenAlex W3186738317