DESIGNS OF PISA-LIKE ASSIGNMENTS WITH YOGYAKARTA CONTEXT TO DETERMINE STUDENTS' LITERACY ABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2019.14.1.6Abstract
This study aims to develop the need to create PISA type problems using the Yogyakarta context that is designed to obtain student literacy skills. This research is a type of development research by adapting the Tessmer development model. This research was carried out in two stages, namely the preliminary stage, starting from the preparation and design, then the evaluation stage, which included self-evaluation, prototype making, small groups, and field tests. This research is limited to making prototypes. The subjects of this study were grade IX students of SMP Negeri 3 Depok, Indonesia. Data collection instruments consist of a collection of observations, interview guidelines, documentation sheets, and questionnaires. Data were analyzed with qualitative and quantitative techniques. The results showed that the design of the type of PISA that had been developed was declared valid; it could be used in the development of small groups and field tests. Thus, PISA design in the Yogyakarta context can be used by students, both with low, medium, and high abilities according to the needs of students in the industrial revolution era 4.0.
Metrics
References
Annisah, Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2011). Development of PISA mathematical model questions on quantity content to measure the mathematical reasoning ability of junior high school students. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya.
De lange, J. (2004). Mathematical Literacy for Living from OECD-PISA Perspecive. Paris: OECD PISA.
Edo, S. I., Ilma, R., & Hartono, Y. (2014). Investigating Secondary School Students’ Difficulties in Modeling Problems PISA-Model Level 5 And 6. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 4(01).
Ginsburg, A., Leinwand, S., Noell, J., & Pollock, E. (2009). Reassessing US International mathematics perfo-mance: New findings from the 2003 TIMSS and PISA. Coleccion Digital Eudoxus, (22).
Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Re-search from a Learning Design Perspective. In J. V. D Akker, K. P. E Gravemeijer., S. McKennedy, N. Nieven (Eds)., Educational Design Research, pp. 17-51. London: Routledge.
Hayat, B., & Yusuf, S. (2010). Bechmark Internasional Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kamaliyah, Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2013). Developing the Sixth Level of PISA-like Mathematics Problems for Secondary School Students. Journal on mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 1 (4), 9-28
Lutfianto, M., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2013). Unfin-ished Student Answer in PISA Mathematics Contex-tual Problem. Journal on Mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 4(2), 201-208
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) USA. PI-SA 2012 Data Tables, Figures, and Exhibits. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014024_tables.pdf, 2013.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Released Mathematics Items. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, and Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing 2013.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Mathematics Framework. New York: Columbia University.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in Focus. New York: Columbia University.
Oktiningrum, W., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing Pisa-like Mathematics Task with Indonesia Natural and Cultural Heritage as Context to Assess Students Mathematical Literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1-8.
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. 2007. Educational Design Re-search: an Introduction. In Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Edi-tor). An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 9-35). Enschede: slo.
Shiel, G., Perkins, R., Close, S., & Oldham, E. (2007). PI-SA Mathematics: a teacher's guide. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematical and Scientific Literacy around the World. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 1 (33), 1-16.
Stacey, K. (2012). The International Assessment of Mathematical Literacy: PISA 2012 Framework and Items (Eds). Of The 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, (pp. 756-772).
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. IndoMS. J.M.E, 2 (2), 95-126.
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. London: Kogan Page.
Vogel, R. (2005). Patterns-a fundamental Idea of mathematical thingking and learning. ZDM, 37(5), 445-449.
Zulkardi. 2002. Developing a Learning Environment on Realistic Mathematics Education for Indonesian Student Teachers. Disertasi. http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/cascade/imei/dissertation/disertasi.html. Accessed date 4 March 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.