Comparative Study on Copyright Exception for Teaching Purposes: Australia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom

Pengarang

  • Ratnaria Wahid Malaysia
  • Ida Madieha Abdul Ghani Azmi Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2012.8.3

Kata kunci:

International copyright law, education, United Kingdom, Australia, Malaysia

Abstrak

While education is considered a basic human right, the copyright system however seems to hamper public access to information and knowledge. This is especially so when information that largely comes from developed countries are used as commodities that have to be bought by developing countries. This paper compares the international and national laws in Malaysia, United Kingdom and Australia on the copyright exceptions to materials used for teaching purposes. It analyzes the different ways countries manage and balance between copyright owners and copyright users’ interest and shows that in many circumstances, copyright owners are over-protected by national copyright systems although this is not required by international copyright law. This paper also shows that international treaties governing copyright law do allow some flexibility for member countries to implement copyright systems based on their own needs and circumstances but such opportunity is not fully utilized by member countries for the benefit of the public.

 

Rujukan

Abbot, F. (2003). Course on dispute settlement in international trade, investment and intellectual property. New York: UNCTAD.

Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. France: UNESCO.

Crews, K. D., & Ramos, J. (2004). Comparative analysis of world copyright law: Issues for university scholarship. Paper presented at the Copyright Management for Scholarship Conference, Zwolle, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://copyright.surf.nl/copyright/ files/International_Comparative_Chart_Zwolle_III_rev071306.pdf http://jis.uum.edu.my Australia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom

Davison, M. J., Monotti, A., & Wiseman, L. (2008). Australian intellectual property law. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Fisher, W., Palfrey, J., McGeveral, W., Harlow, J., Gasser, P., & Jaszi, P. (2006). The digital learning challenge: Obstacles to educational uses of copyright material in the digital age. Harvard University: Berkman Center for Internet and Society.

Garnett, K., James, J. R., & Davies, G. (1999). Copinger and Skone James on copyright (14th ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Geiger, C. (2006). Copyright and free access to information: For a fair balance of interests in a globalised world. European Intellectual Property Review, 28(7), 366–373.

Guibault, L. (2003). The nature and scope of limitations and exceptions to copyright and neighbouring rights with regard to general interest missions for the transmission of knowledge: Prospects for their adaptation to the digital environment. e-Copyright Bulletin. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/17316/ 10874797751l_guibault_en.pdf/l_guibault_en.pdf

Ida Madieha Abdul Ghani Azmi. (2002). Digital technology, copyright and education-The Malaysian perspective. IIUM Law Journal, 10(1), 13–40.

Ida Madieha Abdul Ghani Azmi. (2008). Project on copyright and access to knowledge. Country Study – Malaysia. Consumer International Malaysia.

Khaw, L. T. (2004). Copyright law in Malaysia: Does the balance hold? Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 2.

Matsuura, K. (2009). The future of knowledge acquisition and sharing. Paper presented at the UNESCO Future Forum on Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing. Retrieved from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001824/182432e.pdf

Okediji, R. L. (2006). The international copyright system: Limitations, exceptions and public interest considerations, for developing countries. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development. Issue Paper No 15. Switzerland: ICTSD & UNCTAD.

Perlmutter, S. (2002). Participation in the international copyright system as a means to promote the progress of science and useful arts. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 36, 323–335.

Picciotto, S. (2002). Defending the public interest in TRIPs and the WTO. In P. Drahos & R. Mayne (Eds.), Global intellectual property rights: Knowledge, access and development. Palgrave. http://jis.uum.edu.my Ratnaria Wahid & Ida Madieha Abdul Ghani Azmi

Ricketson, S. (2003). WIPO study on limitations and exceptions of copyright and related rights in the digital environment (No. SCCR/9/7). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Ricketson, S., & Ginsburg, J. (2006). International copyright and neighbouring rights: The Berne convention and beyond (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

Sandy, N. (2004). Practical copyright for information professionals: The CILIP handbook. London: Facet Publishing.

Seng, D. (2009). WIPO study on the copyright exceptions for the benefit of educational activities for Asia and Australia. Geneva: WIPO. Retrieved from http://www.wipo. int/meetings/en/doc_details.

Sithigh, D. M. (2006). Students contributions to academic values. Higher Education Europe, 31(4), 409-413.

Smith, M. W. (1999). Bringing developing countries’ intellectual property laws to TRIPs standards: Hurdles and pitfalls facing Vietnam’s efforts to normalize an intellectual property regime. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 31(1).

Sterling, J. A. L. (2003). World copyright law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

WIPO. (1971). Records of the intellectual property conference of Stockholm, June 11-July 14, Vol.I & II

Tawfik, M. (2005). International copyright law: W[h]ither use rights? In M. Geist (Ed.), In the public interest: The future of canadian copyright law. Ontario: Irwin Law Inc.

UNESCO. (2009). Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/education/

Wagner, & Karen. I. (1998). Intellectual property: Copyright implications for higher education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24(1), 11-19.

Wahid, R. (2011). Exploring flexibilities within the international copyright system for teaching, research and study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Norwich Law School, East Anglia University.

Wahid, R. (2011b). The fairness of ‘stealing’ knowledge for education. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 6(2), 86-95.

Xalabarder, R. (2004). Copyright exceptions for teaching purposes in Europe. IN3:UOC. (Working Paper Series: WP04-004). Retrieved from http://www.uoc.edu/ Australia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom

Xalabarder, R. (2007). On-Line teaching and copyright: Any hopes for an EU harmonized playground? In P. Torremens (Ed.), Copyright law: A handbook of contemporary research. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. http://jis.uum.edu.my

Xalabarder, R. (2009). Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for educational activities in North America, Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia and Israel. Geneva: WIPO. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/meetings/ http://jis.uum.edu.my

Diterbitkan

2012-12-30

Cara Memetik

Wahid, R., & Abdul Ghani Azmi, I. M. (2012). Comparative Study on Copyright Exception for Teaching Purposes: Australia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Journal of International Studies, 8, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2012.8.3

Artikel yang paling banyak dibaca oleh pengarang yang sama