China’s South China Sea Claims, the Historic Rights Debate and the Middle Approach of Islamic International Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2023.19.1.10Kata kunci:
Historic rights, law of the sea, consolidation of title, Islamic international law, South China SeaAbstrak
The notion of historic rights forms the major basis to the claim by China to ‘islands’ in the South China Sea and the adjacent waters which are located within what is known as the nine-dash line. The South China Sea Arbitration case (Philippines v. China) has shown divergence between China’s interpretation of historic rights and the territorial acquisition regime under positive international law. This paper argues that Islamic international law has clearer principles on historic rights that do not upset the territorial sovereignty of coastal states. However, these principles must be appraised in the correct context of Islamic international law because it subscribes to a different approach to state sovereignty. Due to the importance of historic rights in this paper, the authors used both black letter and historical approaches to legal research. With historical legal research, the authors looked at the historical facts objectively in order to know how legal rules on sovereignty claims over maritime areas are formed throughout history particularly from the perspective of Islamic international law. This paper enables Islamic international law to offer a middle ground in which the proponents and opponents of China’s historical rights claims could meet.
Rujukan
Ahamat, H., & Alias, N. (2018). The evolution of the personality of the Malay Sultanate States. International Law and Islam – Brill’s Arab and Islamic Laws Series, 14, 249-276.
Ahamat, H., & Kamal, M. H. M. (2011). Modern application of Siyar (Islamic Law of Nations): Some preliminary Observations. Arab LQ, 25, 423.
Ahamat, H. (2010). The position of Siyar on Free Trade. A Historico-legal analysis. Journal of the History of International Law/ Revue d’histoire du droit international, 12(2), 307-327.
Ahamat, H. (2014). Islamic International Law and the Settlement of International Disputes. Journal of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations, 14(2), 55-70.
Akweenda, S. (1990). Preservation of customary rights in boundary treaties: Recent practice and international law. African Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2(4), 539.
Almuhana, S. A. (2021). The legal regime of the Kuwait–Saudi divided zone: Clash or integration between sovereignty and cooperation? Arab Law Quarterly, 1(aop), 1-12.
Alshadaifat, S. A., & Silverburg, S. R. (2020). Illegitimacy and illegality in international law. Gonzaga. Journal of International Law, 24, 70.
Alverdian, I. (2022). The Tanah-Air concept and Indonesia’s maritime nation aspiration. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 5(2), 64-80.
Anand, R. P. (1981). Maritime practice in South-East Asia until 1600 A.D. and the modern law of the Sea. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 30(2), 440.
Anh, N. T. L. (2016). The July 12 Award on the historic titles, historic rights and impacts on State practices in the South China Sea. Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, 34, 39-55.
Azeem, T. (2020). `Muslims’ share of the waves: Law, war and tradition. Policy Perspectives, 17(2), 67.
Bashir, K. R. (2018). Islamic International Law: Historical foundations and Al-Shaybani’s Siyar. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bendel, J. (2021). Third World approaches to international law: Between theory and method. In R Deplano and N Tsagourias (eds), Research Methods in International Law: A Handbook (pp. 402-415). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bishara, F. A., & Chatterjee, N. (2021). Introduction: The persianate bazaar. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 64(5-6), 487-512.
Bouzenita, A. I. (2007). The Siyar—An Islamic Law of Nations? Asian Journal of Social Science, 35(1), 19-46.
Bouzenita, A. I. (2021). The division of the seas in international and Islamic Law and the concept of Harim al-Bahr: A comparative Fiqh Study. Ilahiyat Studies, 12(2), 143.
Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press.
Burton, J. A., Ovejero, J., Henshaw, J., & Spinage, C. (1999). Traditional rights–what do they mean? Oryx, 33(1), 2-8.
Cherhat, T. (2022). China: The story of a missed opportunity. How China managed to disregard the South China Sea ruling. Conflict Studies Quarterly, (41).
Chowdhary, M. K. (2021). From sea to the shore: Texts, traditions and the maritime practices in the western Indian Ocean, 1600–1800 AD. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 17(2), 11-26.
Cravens, W. S. D. (1998). The future of Islamic legal arguments in international boundary disputes between Islamic states. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 55, 529.
Darmawan, A. R. (2020, April 4). China’s Traditional Fishing Rights in North Natuna Sea Baseless. Jakarta Post, https://www. thejakartapost.com/academia/2020/04/04/chinas-traditional-fishing-rights-claim-in-north-natuna-sea-baseless.html>6 June 2021.
Dellios, R. (2003). Mandala: From sacred origins to sovereign affairs in traditional Southeast Asia. Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies No. 10, Bond University.
Di Cosmo, N., & Wyatt, D. J. (2003). Political frontiers, ethnic boundaries, and human geographies in Chinese history. Routledge Curzon.
Dupuy, F., & Dupuy, P. M. (2013). A legal analysis of China’s historic rights claim in the South China Sea. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 124-141.
El-Wakil, A. (2019). Whoever harms a Dhimmī i shall be his foe on the day of judgment: An investigation into an authentic prophetic tradition and its origins from the covenants. Religions, 10(9), 516.
Emiowele, N. U., & Oji, R. O. (2020). Achieving sustainable peace through diversity management and peace education in Africa: The role of national boundary commission. Proceedings Book, 3, 46.
Friedheim, R. L., & Akaha, T. (2019). Japan and the Ocean. In Japan and the New Ocean Regime (pp. 1-20). Routledge.
Gin, O. K. (2022). ‘Bridge’ to ‘Fence’ A Maritime History of the Straits of Malacca. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 5(2), 81-99.
Gupta, J., Hildering, A., & Misiedjan, D. (2014). Indigenous people’ right to water under international law: A legal pluralism perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 11, 26-33.
Hamidullah, M. (2012). The Muslim conduct of state. Islamic Book Trust.
Hervey, T., Cryer, R., Sokhi-Bulley, B., & Bohm, A. (2011). Research methodologies in EU and international law. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hu, H. (2020). A philosophical inquiry into the concept of territorial sovereignty: A new analytical framework of the territorial disputes in the China seas. Cardozo Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 4, 463.
Hueck, I. J. (2001). The discipline of the history of international law-new trends and methods on the history of international law. J. Hist. Int’l L., 3, 194.
Hui-Yi, K. T. (2016). Re-contemplating the South China Sea issue: Sailing with the wind of the 21st century maritime silk road. The Chinese Journal of Global Governance, 2(1), 63. Ibn Khaldun, Abu Zayd Wali al-Din Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad (2003). Abd Allah Muhammad al-Darwish. (Ed.). Muqaddimat Ibn Khaldun. Dar Yarib.
Jackson, S. (2018). Water and indigenous rights: Mechanisms and pathways of recognition, representation, and redistribution. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5(6), e1314.
Jones, H., & O’Donoghue, A. (2022). History and self-reflection in the teaching of international law. London Review of International Law, 10(1), 71-103.
Kameri-Mbote, P. (2022). Clash of modern and traditional tenure concepts: An overview. International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2020/2021, 3-16.
Kardon, I. B. (2018). China can say no: Analyzing China’s rejection of the South China Sea arbitration toward a New Era of International Law with Chinese Characteristics. U. Pa. Asian L. Rev., 13(2), 1-46.
Keyuan, Z. (2001). Historic Rights in International Law and in China’s Practice. Ocean Development & International Law, 32, 149–168.
Khadduri, M. (1966). The Islamic law of nations: Shaybani’s Siyar. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Khalilieh, H. S. (2019). Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Kopela, S. (2017). Historic titles and historic rights in the Law of the Sea in the light of the South China Sea arbitration. Ocean Development & International Law, 48(2), 181-207.
Korhonen, O. (2021). From interdisciplinary to x-disciplinary methodology of international law. In R Deplano and N Tsagourias (eds), Research Methods in International Law: A Handbook (pp. 345-365). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Landefeld, S. (2019). The evolution of norms and concepts in international law: A social constructivist approach. In R Deplano, Pluralising International Legal Scholarship (pp. 45–63). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lombardi, C. B. (2007). Islamic law in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: An Analysis. Chi. J. Int’l L., 8, 85.
Ma, X. (2018). Merits Award relating to historic rights in the South China Sea arbitration: An appraisal. AsianJIL, 8(1), 12-23.
Malik, M. N. A. (2015). Resistance to Chinese Nine Dotted Line Claim of the Spratly Islands and Solution Provided by Common Heritage of Mankind. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 19, 59-71.
Malik, M. N. A. (2016). Unpalatable Decisions by International Court of Justice (ICJ) and Palatable Solutions by Islamic International Law (siyar). UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 35-70.
McDorman, T. L. (2014). Rights and Jurisdiction over Resources in the South China Sea: UNCLOS and the Nine-Dash Line. In S Jayakumar, T Koh & R Beckman (Eds.), The South China Sea Disputes and Law of the Sea (pp. 144-). Edward Elgar.
Mehfooz, M. (2022). Safeguarding Places of Worship during the Prophetic Era: Assessment of Early Islamic Covenants and Their Impacts on Early Muslim Polities. Religions, 13(9), 799.
Metcalf, C. (2003). Indigenous Rights and the Environment: Evolving International Law. Ottawa L Rev, 35(1), 101.
Morrow, J. A. (2013). The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World. Angelico Press. 6 June 2021
National Institute for South China Sea Studies. (2018). A Legal Critique of the Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration. Asian Yearbook of International Law, 24, 151–293.
Nguyen, K. (2018). Neo-realism: Dominant theory in the South China Sea disputes. University of Ottawa Major Research Paper, https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/37998/1/ NGUYEN%2C%20Ky%2020185.pdf (accessed 7 November 2021).
O’Connell, D. P. (1982). The International Law of the Sea: Vol. 1. Clarendon Press.
Ouchi, K. (1978). A perspective on Japan’s struggle for its traditional rights on the oceans. Ocean Dev & Int’l L, 5(1), 107.
Oxford Learner’s Dictionary. (2022). Tradition. https://www. oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/ tradition.
Powell, E. J., & McDowell, S. (2016). Islamic sovereignty norms and peaceful settlement of territorial disputes. SSRN Papers https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2744651> (accessed 5 June 2021).
Powell, E. J. (2016). Islamic law states and the authority of the international court of justice: Territorial sovereignty and diplomatic immunity. Law & Contemp. Probs., 79, 209.
Powell, E. J. (2022). Complexity and dissonance: Islamic law states and the international order. International Studies Review, 24(1), viac001.
Richardson, B. J. (2001). Indigenous peoples, international law and sustainability. Rev Eur Comp & Int’l Envtl L, 10(1), 1.
Risso, P. A. (1995). Merchants and Faith: Muslim Commerce and Culture in The Indian Ocean, Routledge.
Salter, M., & Mason, J. (2007). Writing law dissertations: An introduction and guide to the conduct of legal research. Pearson Education.
Shapiee, R. B. (2006). A Framework of Economic Siyar of Islamic International Economic Law: An Introduction. Manchester J. Int’l Econ L., 3, 45.
Shapiee, R. B. (2007). International development cooperation within the context of economic Siyar (Islamic International Economic Law): An Overview. J. Islamic St. Prac. Int’l L., 3, 7.
Somos, M., & Smeltzer, J. (2020). Vitoria, Suarez, and Grotius: James Brown Scott’s enduring revival. Grotiana, 41.
Stacey, N. (2007). Boats to burn: Bajo fishing activity in the Australian fishing zone. ANU Press.
Stuart-Fox, M. (2021). A short history of China and Southeast Asia: tribute, trade and influence. Allen & Unwin.
Swaine, M. D. (2016). Chinese views on the South China Sea arbitration case between the People’s Republic of China and the Philippines. China Leadership Monitor, 51(1), 1-13.
Tanaka, Y. (2017). Reflections on historic rights in the South China Sea Arbitration (Merits). The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 32(3), 458-483.
Tarazona, L. O. (2015). Writing international legal history: An Overview. Monde (s), (1), 95-112.
Treves, T. (2013). UNCLOS at Thirty: Open Challenges. Ocean Yearbook, 27, 49.
Van Ittersum, M. J. (2021). Debating the free sea in London, Paris, The Hague and Venice: The publication of John Selden’s Mare Clausum (1635) and its diplomatic repercussions in Western Europe. History of European Ideas, 47(8), 1193-1210.
Westbrook, D. A. (1993). Islamic international law and public international law: Separate expressions of world order. Virginia Journal of International Law, 33, 819.
Yaqin, A. (2007). Legal research and writing. Malayan Law Journal.
Zahid, M. A., & Shapiee, R. (2010a). Customs as a source of siyãr and international law: A comparison of the qualifying criteria. Int’l J. Civ. Soc’y L., 8, 36-55.
Zahid, M. A., & Shapiee, R. (2010b). Pacta Sunt Servanda: Islamic perception. JE Asia & Int’l L., 3, 375-386.
Zahid, M. A., & Shapiee, R. B. (2010c). Considering Custom in the making of Siyar (Islamic International Law). JE Asia & Int’l L., 3, 123.
Zhang, H. (2016). Chinese fishermen in disputed waters: Not quite a ‘people’s war. Marine Policy, 68, 65-73.
Zou, K. (2016). Historic rights in the South China Sea arbitration case: A preliminary reflection. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, 1(2), 268-272.
