An Appraisal of Malaysia’s Continuing Membership in the Commonwealth Organisation

Authors

  • Muhammad Muda School of International Studies UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies, Malaysia
  • Nazariah Osman School of International Studies UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2014.10.7

Keywords:

Malaysia, Commonwealth, Relevance, Continuing Relations

Abstract

The Commonwealth has always had a central place in Malaya/Malaysia’s foreign policy, especially in the period immediately after independence and in the first few years of the formation of Malaysia. This was the period when Malaysia needed Commonwealth assistance most, in part, due to its requirement for external defence. Such assistance was not only relevant in the context of constructive cooperation but, more importantly, there was no other organization at that time in the region that could be of assistance to it. Whilst Britain was keen at accommodating Malaya as a member of the organisation upon independence, it were the Prime Ministers of Malaysia who played decisive roles in determining the extent of the relationship with the Commonwealth. The benefits Malaysia derived from such association were also heavily shaped by the styles and perceptions of successive Prime Ministers. Although the emergence of ASEAN, OIC, and other similar bodies in later years of which Malaysia is also a member, has gradually eroded Malaysia’s profound attachment to the Commonwealth, however, it has no intention of leaving the Commonwealth. It has continued to offer some degree of both tangible and intangible support to the organisation in which successive Malaysian Premiers have acknowledged its relevance to the country’s foreign policy as well as it being a useful platform to articulate Malaysia’s views on political and socio-economic matters concerning, not only Commonwealth countries, but also the world at large.

 

References

Ball, M. (1971). The “Open” Commonwealth. Durham: Duke University Press.

CO 1022/1025, February 1952, Public Record Office, London.

Cross, C. (1968). The Fall of the British Empire, 1918-1968. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Dale, W. (1983). Is the Commonwealth an International Organisation. Commonwealth Law Buletin, 9(2).

Dewan Rakyat. (1971, July 26). col. 3713.

Doxey, M. (1975). International Organisation in Foreign Policy Perspectives. In Year Book of World Affairs. London: Stevens & Sons.

Doxey, M. (1979). The Commonwealth Secretary-General: Limits of Leadership. International Affairs, 55(1).

Foreign Affairs Malaysia. (1990, June). 23(2).

Foreign Affairs Malaysia (1997, June). 10(2). Interview with Tan Sri Ghazali Shafie, No. 3, 50 Queen’s Gate, London on 10 May 1990.

J.A., Cross. (1984). Appraising the Commonwealth. Political Studies, vol. xxxii.

Lloyd, L. (2007). Diplomacy with a Difference: the Commonwealth Office of High Commissioner, 1880-2006. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Low, P. (Ed.) (1971). Proceedings and Background Papers on Trends in Malaysia. http://jis.uum.edu.my Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Malaysian Digest. (1982, July 31). 13(14).

Mansergh, N. (1958). Commonwealth Perspectives. Durham: Duke University Press.

Maprayil, C. (1976). Nehru and the Commonwealth. New Delhi: Radiant Publishers.

McIntyre, W. D. (1974). Colonies into Commonwealth. London: Brandon Press.

Miller, J. D. B. (1965). The Commonwealth in the World. London: Duckworth.

M. O., Ariff. (1970). ThePhilippines Claim to Sabah: Its Historical and Legal Implications. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Muda, Muhammad. (1998). The Significance of the Commonwealth Games in Malaysia’s Foreign Policy. In The Round Table, no. 436.

Muda, Muhammad. (2008). Malaysia at 50: Malaysia’s Foreign Policy and the Commonwealth. In The Round Table, 97(394).

New Straits Times. (1970, July 7).

New Straits Times. (2007, June 8 & 9).

New Straits Times. (2007, July 26).

Osman, Nazariah. (2013). Malaysia and the Commonwealth: the Mahathir Era (1981-2003). (Unpublished PhD Thesis). United Kingdom: Keele University.

Storey, I., Emeners, R., & Singh, D. (Eds.). (2011). Five Power Defence Arrangement at Forty. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Smith, A., & Clyde, S. (1981). Stitches in Time: The Commonwealth in World Politics. London: Andre Deutsch Limited.

The Star. (1982, July 16).

The Times. (1956, December 22).

Tunku Abdul Rahman. (1962, March 24).Speech at the Inauguration of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Commonwealth Society, Kuala Lumpur.

Tunku Abdul Rahman. (1984). Contemporary Issues in Malaysian Politics. Petaling Jaya: http://jis.uum.edu.my Pelanduk Publications.

Wheare, K.C. (1952). The Constitutional Structure of the Commonwealth. London: Oxford Clarendon Press.

Zimmern, A. (1934). The Third British Empire. London: Oxford University Press. http://jis.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

16-12-2014

How to Cite

Muda, M., & Osman, N. (2014). An Appraisal of Malaysia’s Continuing Membership in the Commonwealth Organisation. Journal of International Studies, 10, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2014.10.7

Most read articles by the same author(s)