Globalization, Religious Militancy Andterrorism in Southeast Asia Post-9f11: Implications For Regional Security

Authors

  • K.S. Nathan Faculty of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2007.3.3

Abstract

This paper attempts to underscore the significance of structural factors in the global political economy in providing explanatory value for the incidence/occurrence of religiously induced violence in several parts of the world including Southeast Asia. It argues that globalization unleashes forces and trends that aggravate the complexities of coping with modernity for large sectors of the world's citizenry who are also disempowered by this phenomenon. The crucial point however is that such structural disempowerment in itself is not the cause of religious militancy and terrorism. What makes the difference is the role of perception of such helplessness accompanied by a committed leader or ideologically-inclined groups who capitalize on this situation to further their own political agendas, by blaming it, via religious justification, on the West and secular forces aligned to it. In this way, the radical Islamists legitimize jihad (religiously induced violence) against the 'corrupt and immoral Western-led global order'. Additionally, internal failure in governance and religious reform to cope positively with the demands, challenges and opportunities presented by globalization, coupled with political manipulation by elites to either encourage or pre-empt religiously induced violence --is the second element of causation that is developed in this paper.

 

References

Acharya, Amitav, "A New Regional Order in South-East Asia: ASEAN in the Post-Cold War Era", Adelphi Paper 279, August 1993. Alagappa, Muthiah, ‘Regionalism and Security: A Framework for Analysis’, Paper Presented to the Conference on 'Economic and Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: Agendas for the 1990s', Canberra, July 1993. Bull, Hedley, and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994). Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 2™ ed., (London: Macmillan, 1995). Buszynski, Leszek, "Declining Superpowers: The Impact on ASEAN", The Pacific

Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1990. Buszynski, Leszek, "Southeast Asia in the Post-Cold War Era, Regionalism and Security,” Asian Survey, Vol. XXXII, No. 9, September 1992. Buzan, Barry, ‘The English School as a Research Program: an overview, and a proposal for reconvening’, Paper for the Panel ‘A Reconsideration of the English school: close or reconvene?’ BISA Conference Manchester, December 1999. Camilleri, Joseph A., Asia-Pacific in the Post Hegemonic World, Paper presented for the Conference on Economic and Security Co-operation in the Asia-Pacific: Agenda for the 1990s, Canberra, July 1993. Clements, Kevin P., "Peace and Security in the Asia Pacific Region - Post cold War

Problems and Prospects", Bulletin of Peace Proposals, Vo. 23, No. 2, 1992.

Collins, Alan, The Security Dilemmas of Southeast Asia (Singapore: ISEAS, 2000). Cotton, James, "Vietnam: Reform and Resistance", The Pacific Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1989. Dalby, Simon, "Security, Modernity, Ecology: The Dilemmas of Post-Cold War Security Discourse", Alternatives, 17 (1992). Diez, Thomas and Richard G. Whitman, ‘Comparing Regional International Societies: The Case of Europe’, Paper for presentation at the ISA Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA, March 2002

Eng, Peter, ‘Transforming ASEAN’, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 22, No.1, 1999. Falk, Richard, *The Critical Realist Tradition and the Demystification of Interstate Power: E.H. Carr, Hedley Bull and Robert W. Cox’, in Stephen Gill and James H. Mittelman (eds.), Innovation and Transformation in International Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Guilbert, Francois, "Vietnam and Perestroika", The Pacific Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1990. Hass, Michael, The Asian Way to Peace: A Story of Regional Cooperation (Praeger, 1989).

Ibrahim, Anwar, ‘Crisis Prevention’, Newsweek International, July 21, 1997. Indorf, Hans H., /mpediments to Regionalism in Southeast Asia, Political Constraints among ASEAN Members States (Singapore: ISEAS, 1984). Jackson, Robert H., Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993). Jie, Chen, "Human Rights: ASEAN's New Importance to China", The Pacific Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1993. Jones, David Martin and Mike L. Smith, ‘Southeast Asia and the War against Terrorism: the Rise of the Islamism and the Challenges to the Surveillance States’, in Uwe Johannen, Alan Smith and James Gomez (eds.), September 11 and Political Freedom, Asian Perspectives (Singapore: Select Publishing, 2003). Kusumohamidjojo, Budiono, ‘The Changing Spirit of Regional Cooperation in

ASEAN’, Paper for presentation on 13 August 2002 at the Summer School arranged by the German Universitat Bayreuth, in Jakarta. Leifer, Michael, "Michael Leifer Responds to Geoffrey Wiseman", The Pacific

Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1992. Makinda, Samuel M., Hedley Bull and International Security (Canberra: International Relations Department, ANU, 1997, Working Paper No. 3). Moller, Kay, ‘Cambodia and Burma, the ASEAN Way Ends Here’, Asian Survey, Vol. 38, No. 12, December 1998. Onuf, Nicholas. “Constructivism: A User’s Manual,” in Kubalkova, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World, Armok (NY and London, England: M.E. Sharpe, 1998). Pitsuwan, Surin, ‘Future Directions for ASEAN’, JSEAS Working Paper, No. 10, September 2001. Ruggie, John Gerard. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Constructivist Challenge,” in Peter J.

Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane, and Stephen D. Krasner (eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics (Cambride, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, 1999). lournal of International Studies 2007 Vol. 35,2007 /

Rummel, R. J. 1995. “Democracies Are Less Warlike Than Other Regimes.” European Journal of International Relations (1:4 December) 457-479. Simon, Sheldon W., "The Regionalization of Defence in Southeast Asia", The Pacific

Review, Vol.5, No. 2, 1992. Smith, Anthony L., Strategic Centrality Indonesia's Changing Role in ASEAN (Singapore: ISEAS, 2000). Thayer, Carlyle A., The New Institutions for Economic and Security Cooperation in Southeast Asia: Challenges to Australia, Paper to Royal Australian Army Reserve Staff Group National Seminar, Canberra, October 1992. Tehranian, Majid, ‘The Center cannot Hold: Terrorism and Global Change’, in Uwe Johannen, Alan Smith and James Gomez (eds.), September 11 and Political

Freedom, Asian Perspectives (Singapore: Select Publishing, 2003). Tung, Nguyen Vu, "Vietnam-ASEAN Cooperation in Southeast Asia", Security

Dialogue, Vol 24(1), 1993. Valencia, Mark, J., "Spratly Solution Still at Sea", The Pacific Review, Vol. 6, No. 2. Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999). Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is what States Make of It: The Social Construction of

Power Politics,” /nternational Organization, 46:2 (Spring 1992). Journal of laternational Studies 2007 Vol. 3/2007

Downloads

Published

02-12-2007

How to Cite

Nathan, K. (2007). Globalization, Religious Militancy Andterrorism in Southeast Asia Post-9f11: Implications For Regional Security. Journal of International Studies, 3, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2007.3.3