Does Democratic Peace Theory Genuinely Envision Global Peace? A Critical Approach

Authors

  • Goktug Kiprizli Karadeniz Teknik Ãœniversitesi, Ä°ktisadi ve Ä°dari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası Ä°liÅŸkiler Bölümü, 61080, Ortahisar, Trabzon, Türkiye, Türkiye
  • Yasin Caglar Kaya Karadeniz Teknik Ãœniversitesi, Ä°ktisadi ve Ä°dari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası Ä°liÅŸkiler Bölümü, 61080, Ortahisar, Trabzon, Türkiye, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2019.15.5

Keywords:

Democratic Peace Theory, critical theory of ınternational relations, hegemony, historical block, imperialist peace, 2011 Libya military ınvasion

Abstract

Democratic Peace Theory has been one of the most hotly debated topics ever since the 1980s. From Kant to the present day, the meaning of Democratic Peace Theory has changed, while the theory nowadays claims in principle that democratic states wage war against each other less often owing to their institutions’ and citizens’ abilities to urge their governments to establish a peaceful foreign policy. At this point, the critical theory offers an alternative explanation for the behaviors of democratic countries. This study was designed as a theoretical discussion utilising the analysis of primary and secondary sources in the field, both in printed and electronic materials. Employing the viewpoint of the critical theory, this paper argues that Democratic Peace is the disguise of hegemonic relations and the product of the historical block. This study revealed that democracies are not pacifist actors in the international realm. As articulated by the critical approach, the study also puts forth that the concept of Democratic eace facilitates the expansionist ambitions of hegemonic powers in the international system by utilizing various humanitarian interventions and serves as a means to maintain imperialist peace. Empirical evidence from the military intervention in Libya further reinforces this argument. Thus, this study asserts the idea to be cautious against the propositions of the Democratic Peace Theory because any activities done in the name of spreading democracy may involve a hidden agenda and disrupt the internal stability of non-democratic countries.

 

References

Ade-Ibijola, A. O. (2015). The United Nations Security Council reforms and the permanent five challenge: A historical perspective. Journal of International Studies, 11, 131140.

Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2001). The imperial peace: Democracy, force and globalization. European Journal of International Relations, 5(4), 403-434.

Blomdahl, M. (2018). Interacting interests: Explaining President Obama´s Libyan decision. European Journal of American Studies, 13(2), 2-13.

Chan, S. (1997). In search of democratic peace: Problems and promise. Mershon International Studies Review, 41(1), 59-91.

Cheikh, N. (2013). Stories behind the western-led humanitarian intervention in Libya: A critical analysis. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 7(3), 154-163.

Cox, R. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162-175.

Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.

Cox, R. (1996). Approaches to world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Devetak, R. (2007). Between Kant and Pufendorf: Humanitarian intervention, statist anti-cosmopolitanism and critical international theory. Review of International Studies, 33(1), 151-174.

De Mesquita, B. B., Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Smith, A. (1999). An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 791807.

Dixon, W. J. (1994). Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 14-32.

Doyle, M. (1986). Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151-1168.

Doyle, M. (1983). Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(3), 205-235.

Elman, M. F. (1997). The need for a qualitative test of the democratic peace theory. Massachusetts: the MIT Press.

Falk, R. (2011, September 6). Chapter VII: a loophole for imperialists? Retrieved September 21, 2019, from https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/09/2011958322588 815.html

Gartzke, E., & Weisinger, A. (2013). Permanent friends? Dynamic difference and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 171-185.

Hobson, C. (2011). Towards a critical theory of democratic peace. Review of International Studies, 37(4), 1903-1922.

Kant, I. (1957). Perpetual peace. New York: Liberal Art Press.

Kuperman, A. J. (2015). Obama’s Libya debacle: How a well-meaning intervention ended in failure. Foreign Affairs, 94(2), 66-77.

Maoz, Z., & Russet, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 87(33), 624-638.

Layne, C. (1994). Kant or cant: The myth of democratic peace theory. International Security, 19(2), 5-49.

McDonald, P. (2015). Great powers, hierarchy, and endogenous regimes: Rethinking the domestic causes of peace. International Organization, 69(3), 557-588.

Metcalfe, V. (2011, May). Friend or foe? Military intervention in Libya. Humanitarian Policy Group. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi. org.uk/files/odi-assets/ publications-opinion-files/7119.pdf

Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preference seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organizations, 51(4), 518-520.

Oneal, J., & Russet, B. (1997). The classical liberals were right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 41(2), 267-292.

Owen, J. M. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security, 19(2), 87-125.

Patomäki, H. O. (2016). Democracy in a globalised world. In Erskine, T., & Booth, K. (Eds) International Relations Theory Today (pp. 190-201). Cambridge-Polity Press.

Pazienza, T. A. (2014). Challenging the democratic peace theory – The role of US-China relationship (Master’s thesis), University of South Florida Commons, May.

Pugh, J. (2005). Democratic peace theory: A review and evaluation. Center for Mediation, Peace, and Resolution of Conflict Working Paper Series.

Quackenbush, S. L. (2009). Evaluating the monadic democratic Peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(3), 268-285.

Reiter, D., & Stam, A. C. (1998). Democracy, war initiation, and victory. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 377-389.

Rousseau, D. L., Gelpi, C., Reiter, D., & Huth, P. K. (1996). Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace: 1918–88. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 512-533.

Rosato, S. (2003). The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. American Political Science Review, 97(4),585-602.

Rugeje, E. A., & Maeresera, S. (2016). The United Nations Force Intervention Brigade: Wither the SADC/ICGLR synchronised peace support efforts in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo recurring conflict? Journal of International Studies, 12, 65-79.

Russet, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a Post-Cold war world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Russet, B., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Yasin Caglar Kaya & Goktug Kiprizli

Sambo, A. M., Othman, M. F., & Omar, R. (2017). Liberia’s post-1990 Ecomog Incursion: An assessment of anglophone-francophone dichotomy. Journal of International Studies, 13, 47-65.

Schumpeter, J. (2001). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Schumpeter, J. (1955). Imperialism and social classes. Cleveland: World Publishing.

Small, M., & Singer, J. D. (1976). The war proneness of democratic regimes. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 1(1), 50–69.

Schultz, K. A. (1999). Do democratic institutions constrain or inform? Contrasting two institutional perspectives on democracy and war. International Organization, 53(2), 233-266.

Tangeras, T. P. (2009). Democracy, autocracy and the likelihood of international conflict. Economics of Governance, 10(2), 99-117.

Wallerstein, I. (2004). World system analysis: An introduction. London: Duke University Press.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2019

Issue

Vol. 15 (2019): Journal of International Studies (JIS) Vol. 15, 2019

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kiprizli, G., & Caglar Kaya, Y. (2019). Does Democratic Peace Theory Genuinely Envision Global Peace? A Critical Approach. Journal of International Studies, 15, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2019.15.5