Pentadbiran Awam dan Proses-proses Pengurusan: Satu Kerangka Konseptual

Saadon Awang

doi:10.32890/jgd2006.2.5

Pengarang

Saadon Awang Fakulti Pengurusan Awam dan Undang-undang Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2006.2.5

Kata kunci:

pentadbiran, pengurusan, konseptual, kekaburan, operasional

Abstrak

Bagi sesetengah orang, bidang pentadbiran dan bidang pengurusan merupakan satu bidang yang sama walaupun pada hakikatnya konsep kedua-dua bidang itu adalah berbeza. Kekeliruan ini sebenarnya lahir ekoran daripada kekaburan tentang konsep sebenar bidang-bidang berkenaan. Keadaan ini menyebabkan di dalam beberapa keadaan tertentu, perkataan-perkataan â€˜pentadbiranâ€™ dan â€˜pengurusanâ€™ telah digunakan secara bersilih ganti (interchangeably). Kertas ini cuba menjelaskan dari segi konseptual asal usul bidang-bidang berkenaan supaya dapat menghuraikan kekaburan yang timbul, dan memberi pemahaman tentang kedudukan dan hubungan di antara kedua-dua bidang tersebut. Dengan mengambil konteks pentadbiran awam sebagai subjek kajian, kertas ini mengutarakan satu kerangka konseptual untuk menjelaskan secara operasional konsep-konsep pentadbiran dan pengurusan itu.

Rujukan

Bolman, Lee G., & Deal, Terrence E., (1991). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Dimock, M.E., & Dimock, G.O., (1964). Public Administration. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Donnelly, James H., Gibson, James L., & Ivancevich, John M., (1992). Fundamentals of Management.Boston MA: Irwin.

DuBrin, Andrew J., (1988). Human Relations: A Job Oriented Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Dunn, William N., (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Dye, Thomas R., (1978). Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Gordon, George J., & Milakovich, Michael E., (1995). Public Administration in America. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Henry, Nicholas L., (1990). ‘Root and Branch: Public Administration’s Travail Toward the Future’, in’Public Administration: The State of the Discipline, edited by Naomi B. Lynn and Aaron Wildavsky. Chatam, NJ: Chatam House Publishing.

Lawton, Alan, (1998). Ethical Management for the Public Services. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Le Grand, Julian & Robinson, Ray, (1984). The Economics of Social Problems: The Market versus The State. London: MacMillan.

Rainey, Hal G., (1991). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

Rodee, C.C., Anderson, T.J., Christol, C.Q., & Greene, T.H., (1987). Introduction to Political Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Shafritz, Jay M., & Ott, Steven J., (1992). Classics of Organizations Theory. Belmont, CA: Sadsworth Publishing.

Steers, Richard M., (1985). Introduction to Organization Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.

Theodoulou, Stella Z., (1995). ‘How Public Policy Is Made’, in’Public Policy: The Essential Readings, edited by Stella Z. Theodoulou and Mathhew A. Cahn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Torrington, Derek, & Hall, Laura, (1987). Personnel Management: A New Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Waldo, Dwight, (1990). ‘A Theory of Public Administration Means in Our Time a Theory of Politics Also’, in’Public Administration: the State of the Discipline, edited by Naomi B. Lynn and Aaron Wildavsky. Chatam, NJ: Chatam House Publishers, Inc.

Wan Azmi Ramli, (1991). Dasar Awam di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Pustaka Cipta.