Factors Affecting the Implementation of Local Government Leader Elections: A Case Study Using Additional Voter List (AVL) in the 2020 Samarinda City Government Election

Daryono; Imron  Sohsan; Kemal  Abdella; Kus  Indarto; Diah  Rahayu

doi:10.32890/jgd2022.18.1.2

Authors

Daryono Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Mulawarman University, Indonesia
Imron Sohsan Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social and Humanities Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Kemal Abdella Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, Oromia, Ethiopia
Kus Indarto Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Mulawarman University, Indonesia
Diah Rahayu Psychology Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Mulawarman University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2022.18.1.2

Keywords:

Additional Voter, General Election, Local Government Leader

Abstract

This research aims to determine the factors that influence voters using Additional Voter List (AVL) in the election of Samarinda mayor in 2020. This research focuses on the factors that affect voters who have registered in Voter List using suffrage with AVL in Samarinda.
Samarinda became a research locus with sampling models in 6 subdistricts and 12 villages. The NVivo 12 Interactive Model analysis and Network Analysis technique used the data analysis. The interactive analysis stage consists of data collection, data reduction, data
display, and conclusion. Researchers adopted the Maleong concept to strengthen interactive analysis to analyze the standard degree of truth of research results, therefore data checks must be carried out through credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The results of this study that the factors that affect AVL include Business (Business), Voting Rights Use Campaign and candidates’ success team, Electronic ID Card Ownership, Continuing Studies, Using Voting Rights, Working Mobility, Moving (Marriage), Domicile Transfer, Data Collection Process, Socialization of Election Stages, Election Implementation Tasks and Moving Citizens. Among the 12 factors, emerge 8 factors have the most substantial influence, namely Moving Domicile, Data Collection Process, Electronic ID Card Ownership, Socialization of Election Stages, Using Voting Rights, Voting Rights Campaign and Candidates’ Success Team, Work Mobility and Moving Citizens.

References

Abdullah Rozali. 2005. Implementation of broad autonomy with direct election of Regional Heads, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Geddis, A. (2006). The general election in New Zealand, September 2005. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 809-814.

Ahmed, J., & Hussain, S. (2016). Coverage of Pakistan general election 2008 in leading Pakistan English newspapers: Exploring agenda setting. Global Media Journal, 9(2), 1-16.

Amrizal, D., Yusriati, Y., & Lubis, H. (2018). The role of General Election Commission (KPU) in increasing voters’ participation in Langkat, Medan, Indonesia. Budapest International Research Journal of Governance and Development, 18, No. 1 (Jan) 2022, pp: 11- and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 13-Abdullah Rozali. 2009. Realizing More Quality Elections, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Agus Purwanto, E., & D. R. S. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods: For Public Administration and Social Problems Edition 2 Andrianus Pito,Toni dkk. 2006. Indonesian political system. Nuansa

Arikunto, S. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2019). Research Procedure A Practical Approach. Rineka Cipta.

Bahri. (2008). Conceptual concepts and definitions. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Basri Seta. 2012. Introduction to Political Science. Indie Book Corner

Bungin, Burhan. (2015). Quantitative Research Methodology: Communication, Economics, and Public Policy and Other Social Sciences. Kencana Prenada Data Base of General Election Commissions Republic of Indonesia (www.kpu.ri.com)

Efriza (2012). Political Explore: A Study of Political Science, Alfabeta.

Gaffar & Afan. (2004). Indonesian Politics: Transition Towards Democracy. Pustaka Pelajar

Joko J. Prihatmoko. (2005). Direct Regional Head Election, Pustaka Pelajar.

Koentjaraningrat. (1993). Community Research Methods. Gramedia.

Levine, S., & Roberts, N. S. (1994). The New Zealand electoral referendum and general election of 1993. Electoral Studies, 13(3), 240-253.

M, Singarimbun dan Effendi, S. (2011). Survey Research Methods. LP3ES.

Miles, M. B., & Michael, H. (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis. UI Press.

Narbuko, Cholid & Achmadi, Abu. (2015). Research methodology. PT Bumi Aksara.

Rizkiyansyah F. R. (2014). Consolidated Elections and Democracy, Pt. Epicentrum Mahadaya Komunika Roth, D. Empirical Election Studies, Mitra Alembana Grafika pt. Jakrta

Sardini, Hidayat, Nur. (2011). Restoration of Elections in Indonesia. Fajar Media Press

Sugiyono. (2018). Quantitative, Qualitative Research Methods, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Journal of Governance and Development, 18, No. 1 (Jan) 2022, pp: 11-

Sukardi. (2014). Competency education research methodology and practice. Bumi Aksara.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2017). Educational Research Methods. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Surbakti, Ramlan. 2010. Understanding Political Science. Grasindo Tim Gradien. 2012. General Election of Members of the People’s Representative Council. Gradien Mediatama Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections