Juridical Review of Implementation of Immigration Administrative Action in Indonesia

Authors

  • Budy Mulyawan Immigration Polytechnic, South Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Ali Embi Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Sohirin Sohirin School of Government,Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2020.16.2.2

Keywords:

Instructions for Implementation, Discretion, Act

Abstract

It has been nearly a decade since Indonesia had the latest Immigration Act (Law Number 6 of 2011). However, since the new Immigration Act was issued, the implementation of regulations for The Immigration Administrative Action has not yet been established. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the implementing regulations of the legislation if the legal basis had been changed and to find out whether the discretion principle can be used as the basis for the procedure of Immigration Administrative Action. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. The conclusion drawn from the research is that the Director General of Immigration Instructions for Implementation Number: F-314.Il.02.10 of 1995 concerning procedures for Immigration Action is still valid but is no longer relevant to the current law, and the use of discretionary authority by the agency Government administration officials can only be done in certain cases where the applicable laws and regulations do not regulate them or because existing regulations governing things are unclear and they are carried out in an emergency or urgent matter for the public interest.

References

Anna Erliyana (2005). Analisis Keputusaan Presiden RI Tahun 1981-19982005. Surabaya: Airlangga..

Atmosudirjo, S. Prajudi. (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia,.

Ibrahim, Johny. (2005). Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Surabaya: Bayumedia Publishing,.

Khamdan, Muh. (2015). Teori Dan Praktek Tindakan Administratif Keimigrasian, Modul Pendidikan Dasar Keimigrasian. Jakarta: Poltekim Press..

MD, SF Marbun dan Moh Mahfud. (2006). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Cetakan Ke-6. Yogyakrta: Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Muhammad Yusuf. (2011). Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian UangBandung: Alfabeta..

Ridwan. (2014). Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit FH UII,. ———. 2009. Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi Dan Peradilan Administrasi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit FH UII. “Mengapa Undang-Undang Perlu Peraturan Pelaksanaan.” http://setkab. go.id.

Soekanto, Soerjono; Sri Mamudji. 2004. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tujuan Singkat). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada,. Sudikno Mertokusumo. 2007. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar). Liberty, Yogyakarta. Law No. 22 of 1999 concerning Regional Government, 1999. Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administrassion, 2014. Law No. 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration, 2011. Accessed February 13, 2019. http://www.imigrasi.go.id/phocadownloadpap/Undang-Undang/ uu-6-tahun-2011.pdf.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2020

How to Cite

Mulyawan , B., Embi , M. A., & Sohirin , S. (2020). Juridical Review of Implementation of Immigration Administrative Action in Indonesia . Journal of Governance and Development (JGD), 16(2), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2020.16.2.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jgd2020.16.2.2 OpenAlex W3173621374

Most read articles by the same author(s)