Effect of Fiscal Decentralization and Revenue Allocation on Local Government Performance: The Nigerian Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2014.10.2.4Keywords:
federalism, ï¬ scal decentralization, revenue allocation, local government performance, NigeriaAbstract
In federalism, ï¬ scal decentralization becomes an important pre-condition upon which the practice of good governance revolves, because it is anchored on efï¬ cient resource mobilization and utilization to ensure widespread participation and adequate representation. To facilitate good governance, the Nigerian state is politically structured into three governmental tiers: the federal, the state and the local government. However, evaluation of the performance of Nigerian local governments in terms of social service delivery depicts a massive failure. This paper therefore seeks to examine whether there is a nexus between local government failure and the nature of ï¬ scal decentralization and revenue allocation in Nigeria. The paper present key issues, trend and challenges in the operation of ï¬ scal decentralization in Nigeria. For instance, all decisions on revenue generation are controlled by the center and the vertical revenue allocation is structurally inclined toward the federal government, which negates the tenets of federalism and hence; grossly affects the capability of both the state and the local government to exercise ï¬ nancial autonomy. In conclusion, the paper offers some important suggestions which can galvanize the ï¬ scal capacity of the local government, thereby transforming them into viable machineries of social service delivery at the grassroots.
References
Afolabi, L. (1999). Monetary economics. Ibadan, Nigeria: Heinemann Educational Books.
Agba, M.S, Akwara, A.F, & Idu, A.Y. (2013). Local government and social service delivery in Nigeria: A content analysis. Academic journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 455-462.
Ahmad, A.A. (2013). Local government autonomy and effectiveness in Nigeria. Journal of African & Asian Local Government, 2(1), 48-
Akume, A.T. (2010). The effect of inter-governmental relations on federalism: An examination of intergovernmental (1999-2007). A Postgraduate Seminar Paper, Department of Public Administration, University of Nigeria.
Anyanwu, J.C. (1993). Public finance: Theory and policy in Nigeria. Onitsha Joanne Education Publisher’s Ltd.
Central Bank of Nigeria (2011). Statistical Bulletin. Abuja: CBN.
Dang, D.Y. (2013). Revenue allocation and economic development in Nigeria: An empirical study. SAGE open July-September, 1-7.
Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN). (1999). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN). Lagos: Federal Printing Press.
Gallagher, M. (1998). Choices in fiscal federalism: Centre for applied studies in economics, Case Study Bo. 98/1. September.
Inyang, B. (2014). Contending issues in the management of intergovernmental relations in the Nigeria Federal Administration System. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (3), 226-233.
Jimoh, A. (2003). Fiscal federalism: The Nigerian experience. Paper Delivers at the Meeting on Fiscal Policy and Growth in Africa UNCC Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Economic for Africa.
Likita, O. (1999). Elements of public finance. Lagos: AIP Ltd.
Ojo, E.O. (2010). The politics of revenue allocation and resource control in Nigeria: Implication for federal stability. Federal Governance Studies, 7(1), 15-38.
Okoli, F.C. (2009). Theory and practice of local government: A Nigerian perspective. Enugu: Bismarck.
Salami, A. (2011). Taxation, revenue allocation and fiscal federalism in Nigeria: Issues, challenges & policy options. Economic Annals, LV1(189), 27-50.
Sambo, M. (2000). Local government and civil service in Nigeria. Warri: PTI Printing Press Ltd.
Ukiwo, U. (2006). Creation of local government areas and ethnic conflicts in Nigeria: The case of Warri, Delta State. Retrieved 10/09/2014, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? doi=10.1.1.119.5294.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.










