Debating the Inconsistencies between Constitutional Provisions on Decentralisation and Citizen Participation Realities in Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2014.10.2.1Keywords:
constitutionality, legality, governance, policy, practice, equity, human rights, devolutionAbstract
This paper provides a kaleidoscopic description and explanation on the challenges and problems associated with Zimbabwe’s governance terrain after the many years of political polarisation, economic crisis and social mistrust characterising the country. The present situation puts the whole debate of devolution as provided for in the new Constitution, to precariousness. The central thematic issues that this paper seeks to address are legality, constitutionality, and social, economic and spatial marginality that are likely to continue if the state remains stuck in erstwhile practices hence unwilling to move to redress that imbalances the characterise the nation today. This paper emanates from the fact that there is dearth of current literature in Zimbabwe on issues of decentralisation and constitutional issues. We use textual and discourse analyses to describe and explain this strands of debate in this present discussion. The article also adopts documentary review, where the Zimbabwean Constitution was assessed with the aim of exposing the intentions on devolution. From this study, it become clear that a big lacuna exists between constitutional intends and practice. The citizen participation notion is one that has not been implemented as the intensions on devolution have not been operationalised. The paper recommends political will on the part of the central government to implement the provisions of the New Constitution as a way of enhancing citizen participation, democratic governance and human rights promotion.
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
Ashley, C., Chaumba, J., Cousins, B., Lahiff, E., Matsimbe, Z., Mehta, L., Mokgope, K., Mombeshora, S., Mtisi, S., Nhantumbo, I., Nicol, A., Norfolk, S., Ntshona, Z., Pereira, J., I Scoones, S.S.I., & Wolmer, W. (2008). The politics of decentralisation in Southern Africa. Retrieved 22 March 2014, from http://www. future-agricultures.org/EN/WDR/WDR_decentralisation_ SLSA%20Team.pdf.
Bullivant, J., Burgess, R., Cobertt-Nolan, A., & Godfrey, K. (2006). Good governance handbook. Retrieved 23 March 2014, from http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/Guidance/GGI-HQIP-Good-Governance-Handbook-Jan-2012.pdf.
Chikerema, A.F. (2013). Citizen participation and local democracy in Zimbabwean Local Government System. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 13(2), 87-90.
Chirisa, I., Muzenda, A., & Manyeruke, C. (2013 ). The devolution debate and the new constitution of Zimbabwe: An exploratory evaluation. Southern Peace Review Journal, 2(2), 86-103.
Dorman, S.R. (2003 ). NGOs and the constitutional debate in Zimbabwe: From inclusion to exclusion. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(4), 845–863.
Dzinesa, G.A. (2012). Zimbabwean constitutional reform process: Challenges and prospects. Wynberg, South Africa: Institute of Justice and Reconcilliation.
Edoun, L., & Jahed, M. (2009). The merits of decentralisation and local economic development in South Africa. Global Action for Africa’s Development. Retrieved 25 March 2014, from www.glafad.org/pdf/Decentralisation_and_LED_.pdf.
Forjan, S. & Shakespeare, T. (2009). Can localism deliver. Lessons from Manchester. Manchester: Localis.
Gikonyo, W. (2013). Understanding devolved government in Kenya. Nairobi: The Institute of Social Accountability.
Governance and Transparency Fund. (2011). Kenya: Progressive devolution-Village elders are key. London: Governance and Transparency Fund.
Government of Zimbabwe. (1988). Rural District Councils Act (Chapter 29:13). Harare: Government of Zimbabwe.
Government of Zimbabwe. (2013). Constitution of Zimbabwe (Ammendment No. 20). Harare: Government of Zimbabwe.
Hartwich, O. (2013). A global perspective on localism. Wellington: The New Zealand Iniative.
Horsley, J.P. (2009). Public participation in the People’s Republic: Developing a more participatory governance model in China.
Jones, H. (2009). Equity in development. Why it is important and how to achieve it? London: Overseas Development Institute.
Kangu, M. (2010). Final report of the taskforce on devolved government: A report on the implementation of devolved government in Kenya. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Kay, R.S. (2009). Original intention and public meaning in constitutional interpretation. Northwestern University Law Review 103(2), 703-726.
Koki, M., Chege, B.N., & Nabulumbi, W. (n.d2012). Devolution and nation building in Kenya. Strathmore University. Retrieved 25 March 2014, from: www.strathmore.edu/ethics/pdf/ DevolutionNationBuildingSU1.pdf.
Magaisa, A.T. (2011). Constitutionality versus constitutionalism. Lessons for Zimbabwe’s constitutional reform process. Retrieved 25 March 2014, from http://kar.kent.ac.uk/30495/.
Makumbe, J. (1996). Participatory development: The case of Zimbabwe. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications.
Mandiyanike, D. & Musekiwa, N. (2003). Zimbabwe 2013 constitution and its implications on local self-government. Southern Peace Review Journal, 2(2), 49-67.
Masunungure, E.V., & Ndoma, S. (2013). The popular quest for devolution in Zimbabwe. Afrobarometer Briefing Paper No. 114. Harare: Afrobarometer.
Mutizwa-Mangiza, N.D. (1990). Decentralization and district development planning in Zimbabwe. Public Administration and Development, 10 (4), 423–435.
Mutizwa-Mangiza, N.D. (1992). Rural local government finance in Zimbabwe: The case of Gokwe District Council. Public Administration and Development, 12(1), 111–122.
Mwenda, K. (2010). Devolution in Kenya: Prospects, challenges and the future. Nairobi: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Mandaza, I. (2012). The COPAC debacle: A case for another constitutional commission? Retrieved 3 April 2014, from: http://www.sapes.org.zw/index.php/3-sapes-trust/news/36-the-copac-debacle-a-case-for-another-constitutional-commission.
Nyati, L. (2008). Public participation: What has the Constitutional Court given the Public?
PlanAfric (2000) Rural planning in Zimbabwe: A case study. A report prepared by PlanAfric, Bulawayo. Environmental Planning Issues No. 23. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Parron, M. (2006). Increasing citizen participation in local governance in Latin America’s local citizen councils. Evidence and lessons from Latin America. Policy Brief.
Rai, M. (2010). Legal and citizen participation in South Asia regional report (India, Nepal and Bangladesh). Centre for Partcipatory Research in Asia (PRIA).
Sims, B.M. (2013). Conceptualising local government: Local perceptions on devolution and participation in Zimbabwe. Retrieved 16 April 2014, from www.academia.edu/3536324/ Conceptualising_Local_Government_Local_Perceptions_on_ Devolution_and_Participation_in_Zimbabwe?
Smith, B. (2003 ). Public policy and public participation: Engaging citizens and the community in the development of public policy. Halifax: Health Canada, Atlantic Region.
Torjman, S. (2005 ). What is policy? Caledon: Institute of Social Policy.
UNESCO (2012). UN system task team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. Governance and Development. Geneva: UNESCO.
United Nations. (2007). Good governance practices for the protection of human rights. New York: United Nations.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
