Conflict Of Interests Between Government and Private Sector in Indonesia Forest Fire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2016.12.2.1Keywords:
Forest Fire, Government Policies, Private InterestAbstract
Forest fires in Indonesia have taken a serious attention at both national and international forums. The paper argued that the inability of government to solve the on-going issue of forest fires is due to a conflict of interests between government and private sectors. For example, certain laws and regulations from central government to local government seem to be vague and contradictive to one another. In addition to wague laws, the way these laws and policies are implemented at the federal and local levels also indicate a clear divergent of policy directions. To make matters worst, private organizations that collobarate with government agencies locally or nationally to combat forest fires have their own interests to pursue. One way in which private plantation owners commonly do to reduce cost of planting new palm oil trees is through slash and burned. As a result, a combination of unclear and inconsistent policy directions along with relentless pursuit of private interests reveals no clear solution to the ongoing crisis of forest fires. Despite tough sanctions and penalties that can be imposed on the guilty private plantation owners, the enforcement of those sanctions rarely takes place. Thus, rooting out forest fires seems to go no where as long as government policies are inconsistent and private interests continue to be pursued without regard to environmental and social impacts.
References
Adinugroho, Wahyu Catur. 2005. Panduan Pengendalian Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Gambut. Proyek Climate Change. Forest and Peatlands in Indonesia. Bogor: Indonesia. Carter, W Nick. 2008. Disaster Management. A Disaster Management Handbook. Asian Development Bank. Mandaluyong City: Philippine. Edward III, George C. 1980. Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press: Washington.
Hamdi, Muchlis. 2014. Kebijakan Publik: Proses, Analisis, Partisipasi. Ghalia Indonesia: Bogor. 2002. Bunga Rampai Pemerintahan. Yarsif Watampone: Jakarta. http://jambi.tribunnews.com/2015/10/13/tertinggi-pada-pukul-7-pagi-ini-pergerakan-ispu-di-kota-jambi http://bisnis.liputan6.com/read/2339768/petani-sawit-harus-ganti-cara-pembukaan-lahan http://regional.kompas.com/read/2015/09/26/19452511/60.Penerbangan. di.Bandara.Pekanbaru.Batal.karena.Kabut.Asap http://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/308547-kebakaran-hutan-terjadi-karena-lemahnya-pengawasan.html http://nasional.sindonews.com/read/1046634/15/cegah-kebakaran-hutan-dengan-revisi-uu-lingkungan-hidup-1442749215 http://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20151023185422-20-86962/ pemerintah-minta-teras-narang-cabut-pergub-pembakaran-lahan/ Law No 23 year 2014 on Local Government Law No 32 year 2004 on Local Government Law No. 32 Year 2009 on Enviroment Management and Protection Government Rule on No. 60 Year 2009 on The Change on Government Rule No. 45 year 2004 on Forrest Protection Ministry of Forestry Rule No. 12 Year 2009 on Forrest Fire Controls
Sulianti, Dian. 2003. Kinerja Perangkat Daerah dalam Penanggulangan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Pontianak dan Kabupaten Sambas Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah). Tesis Universitas Indonesia.
Tacconi, L. 2003. Kebakaran Hutan di Indonesia: Penyebab, Biaya dan Implikasi Kebijakan. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 38. Bogor. Indonesia.
Qodriyatun, Sri Nurhayati. 2014. Kebijakan Penganganan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan. Info Singkat Kesejahteraan Sosial. Volume VI, Nomor 6 Tahun 2014.
Wibawa, Samodra. 1994. Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Yunardi, Syafrul. 2005. Analisis Dampak Kebakaran Hutan di Indonesia (Melalui Sistem Pendekatan Neraca Sosial Ekonomi). Tesis. Universitas Indonesia.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.










