The Challenges of Smart City Implementation in Indonesia: Case Study of Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2019.15.1.1Keywords:
Smart City, Sleman Smart Regency, ChallengesAbstract
The city’s growth is accelerating, from year to year, the population in every city in the world increases drastically. This makes the cities in the world have the advantages as well as the challenge in facing the problem. Urban-speciï¬c problems such as congestion, flooding, public services that are not maximally controlling unstable resources are a problem to be solved together. Smart city concept is present to answer the challenge. By bringing forward effective city concepts and efï¬cient smart city to be a new prima donna for every regional leader to be implemented. In Indonesia alone, smart city has begun in the adoption by many big cities, such as Jakarta, Bandung Surabaya, Makassar, and others. In Indonesia the government has also implemented the movement of 100 smart cities in Indonesia. In the year 2017 there are 24 districts that participated in the movement, including Sleman District. Sleman District is a district with a vision and mission in line with the concept of the smart city. In Sleman smart city application has been running for quite a while. But of course, in the application of the concept, there are many challenges that must be resolved by the government, such as community culture in using the internet, commitment from Government in its application and supporting technology realization intelligent district. This research departs from one of the important issues in Indonesia that a smart city, and also try to analyze the obstacles in the application of smart city, especially in Sleman regency. This research is library research with data collection was conducted through literature review by collecting various journal articles, websites, reports, and books. The collected data were then described and analyzed to satisfy the research purposes.
References
Agus Pahrul S., Candra. H. N. and Miswar A. (2017). Smart Environment and Energy. Energy Procedia 91: 970–79.
Boni, P., Zo. H., Ciganek, A. P and Rho, J. J (2011). Determinants of e-Government Assimilation in Indonesia: An Empirical Investigation Using a TOE Framework, Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1, 49-80.
California Institute. (2001), Ten Steps To Becoming A Smart Community, available at http://www.smartcommunities.org/library _10steps.htm.
Clarke, R. Y. (2013). Smart cities and the internet of everything: The foundation for delivering next-generation citizen services. Alexandria, VA, Tech. Rep.
Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. In Smart city (pp. 13-43). Springer International Publishing access at https://apic.city.com
Dwiyanto, Agus, 2003. Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PSKK UGM.
FreckColombijn (2015). dkk.kota lama kota baru sejarah kota-kota di Indonesia. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Ombak.
Fridayani, H. D. and Nurmandi, A. (2019). Do Smart Citizens Make a Smart City? A Case Study on the Factors Influencing Citizen Behavior Using Lapor Sleman Online-Based. CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5 (1), 71-100.
Garuda Smart City Model (2012). can be access at http://www.indohcf.com/ entry/judul-beritaslemankab.go.id
Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., &Arribas, D. (2012). Smart cities in perspective–a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 229-246.
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2002). Better Public Services through e-government: Academic Article in support of Better Public Services through e-Government.
Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147-149
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: Digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291). ACM.
Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25-36.
Nurmandi, A. and Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28,3, 198-220.
Oka A, Yoeti, (1982). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata, Bandung, Angkasa.
Osborne, David & Ted Gaebler. (1992) Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector. New York, A William Patrick Book.
Prawira, M. A. (2014). Inovasi Layanan (Studi Kasus Call Center SPGDT 119 sebagai Layanan Gawat Darurat pada Dinas Kesehatan Provinisi DKI Jakarta). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(4), 715-721.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17(28), 1-28.
Rihana, Z., Purnomo, H., &Widodo, I. D. (2014). Analisis Faktor Pendorong Wisata wan untuk Mengunjungi Desa Wisata (Studi Kasus pada Desa Ketingan, Sleman, Yogyakarta). JOIR [internet]. [Diunduh 3 April 2017], 8(2), 63-74.
Rosalina, V., Sugiyani, Y., &Triayudi, A. (2017). Perancangan Infrastruktur Jaringan Komputer Dalam Konsep Membangun Serang Menuju Smart City. Prosisko: Jurnal Pengembangan Riset dan Observasi Sistem Komputer, 1.
Sinambela, L. P. (2006) Reformasi Pelayanan Publik: Teori, Kebijakan, dan Implementasinya.Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.
Smart Room in Government Office. (2015). Access at hhtp//www mediacenter. slemankab.go.id
Spears, R. Postmes, T., Wolbert, A. Lea, M., & Rogers, P. (2000). Social Psychological Influence of ICT ́s on Society and their Policy Implications (Amsterdam: Infrodrome).
Tribunnews, (2017). Access at http://jogja.tribunnews.com/2017/04/04/ pemkab-sleman-luncurkan-aplikasi-lapor-sleman-sebagai-wadah-aspirasi-masyarakat
Winardi, S. (2017). Konsep pengembangan kabupaten yang cerdas (Studi Kasus: Kabupaten Sleman, Yogyakarta). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Respati, 12(34).
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.










