Penghulu Institution Credibility and Leadership: Critical Challenges in Administrative Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2019.15.2.1Keywords:
Administrative Reform, District Office, Penghulu, Head of Mukim, KedahAbstract
The institution of Penghulu is the oldest and longest in the history of government administration in Malaysia. Since 50 century ago the credibility and leadership of Penghulu is maintain at higher respect of society and government structure. However the credibility of the institution getting weak due to rapid urbanization, lower entry level requirements and inadequate stafï¬ng diminish the power and influence of Penghulu. They are no longer seen as the authoritative ï¬gure for rural development, deliver their functions and existence have been questioned. Building upon this framework, this paper attempts to examine the challenges facing by institution of Penghulu in deliver duties in Kedah state administration. The study utilizes a qualitative method that involves personal interviews of 10 currents and former Penghulu as well as former state secretary in Kedah. The ï¬ndings of the interviews are classiï¬ed based on three major themes: entry level requirements, human resource development, and symbol of reference.
References
Ali, S. H. (1975). Malay Peasant Society and Leadership (East Asian social science). Oxford University Press.
Ayob, A. M. (2007). Kaedah Penyelidikan Sosio-ekonomi. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Bakar, S., A. (2008). Penghulu dan Penggawa: Selaku Pentadbir, Pengurus Dan Pemudahcara Rakyat, Bengkel Pemantapan Program latihan Penolong Pegawai Tadbir N27 di INTAN Kampus Wilayah Selatan.
Bonney, R. (1971). Kedah 1771–1821: The Search for Security and Independence. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Ghazali, M. N. (2008). Penghulu Sebagai Pembantu Kepada Pegawai Daerah Dan Pentadbir Tanah Daerah. Bengkel Pemantapan Program latihan Penolong Pegawai Tadbir N27 di INTAN Kampus Wilayah Selatan.
Hamzah, M. (2008) Institusi Penghulu: Dahulu, Kini Dan Masa Depan, Bengkel Pemantapan Program Latihan Penolong Pegawai Tadbir N27 di INTAN Kampus Wilayah Selatan.
Izzuddin, R., M. (2013). Politisasi Pemimpin Bawahan Dalam Pentadbiran Negeri: Rujukan Khusus Institusi Penghulu/Ketua Kampung dan Penggawa di Kelantan.Social Sciences Postgraduate National Seminar. Gelugor: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Kementerian Pembangunan Luar Bandar. (2019). Dasar Pembangunan Luar Bandar. Kementerian Pembangunan Luar Bandar, Putrajaya: Malaysia.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Mc Graw Hall Book Company.
Majid, K. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Nor Razinah, M., Z., F. A. (2016). Traditional Roles Of Penghulu In Resolution Of Disputes: A Comparative Study From Pasir Mas, Kelantan (Malaysia) And Indragiri Hilir, Riau (Indonesia). Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, 2(2), 103-112.
Pejabat Penghulu Mukim Rambai.(2014). Carta Organisasi Mukim Rambai. Akses on 16 November 2019 at http://pdp-pmukimrambai.blogspot. com/p/carta-organisasi-mukim-rambai.html.
Pekeliling Perkhidmatan Bilangan 15 Tahun 2009. (2009). Skim Perkhidmatan Penghulu Gred NP27, NP32, NP36, NP40. Kerajaan Malaysia
Shariff A. S., M. (2012). Modenisasi Pentadbiran Negeri Kedah 1895–1954. Sintok, Kedah: UUM Press.
Wan Rabiah, W. O., Kushairi, R., & Suharto, T. A. (2015). The Roles of Tok Penghulu and Community Leaders in Perak. Retrieved from http://idrperak.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/The-Role-of-Tok-Penghulu.pdf
Zain. M. (2019). Kedah, Kelantan dan Perlis antara Negeri Miskin, Astro Awani. September 14, akses pada 29 Okt 2019 di http://www. astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/kedah-kelantan-dan-perlis-antara-negeri-miskin-217522.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.










