Kesan Kebebasan Ekonomi terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Negara: Kajian Empirikal di ASEAN-5

Pengarang

  • Hussin Abdullah Kolej Perniagaan, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ferayuliani Yuliyusman Kolej Perniagaan, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2010.6.1

Kata kunci:

kebebasan ekonomi, pertumbuhan ekonomi, kesan kepegunan, keterbukaan

Abstrak

Kebebasan ekonomi merupakan isu yang agak baru tetapi ia menjadi salah satu faktor yang terpenting dalam usaha untuk meningkatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi sesebuah negara serta memberi kesan kepada Keluaran Dalam Negeri Kasar (KDNK). Kajian ini dilakukan untuk menguji adakah pembolehubah kebebasan ekonomi memberi kesan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di negara ASEAN-5 iaitu Indonesia, Malaysia, Filipina, Singapura dan Thailand dengan menggunakan pembolehubah-pembolehubah kebebasan ekonomi. Kajian ini juga melihat pembolehubah bebas yang manakah memberikan kesan yang paling besar ke atas pertumbuhan ekonomi negara. Kajian ini menggunakan Ujian Punca Unit Panel iaitu IPS untuk mengesan kepegunan data panel manakala bagi ujian ko-integrasi pula digunakan Ujian Pedroni dan Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) Estimation. Hasil kajian ini mendapati semua pembolehubah kebebasan ekonomi mempunyai hubungan yang signifikan secara bersama mahupun individu iaitu berhubungan secara langsung dengan pertumbuhan ekonomi bagi kelima-lima negara ASEAN-5. Semakin tinggi tahap kebebasan ekonomi di sesebuah negara, maka semakin terbuka negara tersebut dan akhirnya memberi kesan yang positif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi negara dan juga KDNK.

Rujukan

De Haan, J. & Jan-Egbert, S. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 215–41. --------------- (2003). Does more democracy lead to greater economic freedom? New evidence for developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy 19, 3 (September): 547–63.

Dreger, C. & Reimers, H.E. (2005). Health care expenditures in OECD countries: A panel unit root and cointegration analysis. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Paper No. 1469.

Engle, R.F. & Granger C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.

Easterly, W. & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203-1250.

Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufman, D. & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (2000). Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinantsof unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 459–493.

Goldsmith, A. A. (1995). Democracy, property rights and economic growth. The Journal of Development Studies 32, 2 (December, 1995), 157-174.

Graeff, P., & Mehlkop, G. (2003). The impact of economic freedom on corruption: Different patterns for rich and poor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 605–20.

Gwartney, J. Robert, L., & Walter Block. (1996). Economic freedom of the world: 1975-1995. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

Gwartney, J. Robert, L. & Randall, H. (1999). Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(4), 1–21.

Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Discussion Paper. University of Cambridge, December.

Law, S.H. & Demetriades, P. (2006). Openness, institutions and financial development. World Economy & Finance Research Programme, Working Paper Series WEF 0012.

Leblang, D. A. (1996). Property rights, democracy and economic growth. Political Research Quarterly, 49 (1), 5-26.

Mark Gradstein. (2003). Governance and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 505–525.

Md Zyadi, M.T., Sanep, A. & Mohd Hafiz, A. W. (2008). Kesan rasuah terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi: Kajian kes di Malaysia. Seminar Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia 2008.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. MA.

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Special Issue, 0305-9049 ---------------- (1996). Fully modified OLS for heterogenous cointegrated panels and the case of Purchasing Power Parity. Economic Letters. ---------------- (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series test with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Letters.

Sala-i-Martin, X. & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: An illustration from Nigeria. NBER Working Paper No. 9804. NBER, Cambridge, MA.

Stroup, D. M. (2007). Economic freedom, democracy, and the quality of life. World Development, 35(1), 52–66.

Tavares, J. & Romain, W. (2000). How democracy afects growth. European Economic Review, 45, 1341-1378.

Diterbitkan

2010-12-31

Terbitan

Bahagian

Articles

Cara Memetik

Abdullah, H., & Yuliyusman, F. (2010). Kesan Kebebasan Ekonomi terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Negara: Kajian Empirikal di ASEAN-5. Journal of Governance and Development (JGD), 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2010.6.1

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.title##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.harvested## 2026-09-08
2 ##plugins.generic.citations.panel.citations##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.body##

##plugins.generic.citations.panel.identifiers## DOI 10.32890/jgd2010.6.1 OpenAlex W53736047 Semantic Scholar CorpusID 150531315