Concession is a Determinant for The Implementation of Telecommunication Technology Field in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2018.14.1.1Keywords:
oncessions license, Concession regulation, Public interest, Telecommunication technology ï¬eldAbstract
The existence of concessions in Indonesia is actually not a new thing, because previously it was regulated during the Dutch colonial era, which was stated in Burgilijk Wetboek (BW), under the 1899 Indische Mijnwet law which stipulates that all mining cooperation is granted in the form of concessions to Dutch citizens and their allies to explore and exploit the wealth of Mining Resources in Indonesia. And in its development, the concession in Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration in Article 1 number 20 is given a deï¬nition as: a decision of the Governmental Ofï¬cer authorized as a form of agreement from the approbation of government bodies and/ or ofï¬cials with other government bodies and/ or ofï¬cials in the management of public facilities and/ or natural resources and other management in accordance with the provisions of the legislation. However, at reality the concession in Indonesia is only limited to be used as an approbation or agreement in terms of natural resource management and transportation only, while in terms of the implementation of services related to the public interest, the concession has not been fully utilized. Just like what the author did to do research with the theme of concessions in the ï¬eld of telecommunication technology. The ï¬rst purpose of the objective paper is present that concessions license could be applied to telecommunication technology ï¬elds in Indonesia and the second is to provide all the regulation in Indonesia that is needed for regulate concessions license for the telecommunication technology ï¬eld in Indonesia. In conducting this research the author uses the analysis contents method of the regulations that related with concession license, where is the regulation is provided by the National Law Ofï¬ce in the under of Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights as a provider of data banks for all the regulations that exist in Indonesia. And in addition, besides using the content analysis method of the regulations, the author is also use literature research method from several journals as supporting data. This study does not rule out the possibility that concessions can help and be used in many other ï¬elds that are closely related to the public interest that need to be served by the Government of Indonesia. This paper contributes a mind framework for policy makers and government to use concession license for improving the public interest service.
References
Ã, J. A., & Karaivanov, A. (2010). Learning by doing vs. learning from others in a principal-agent model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(10), 1967–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.04.
Ahmad, A. W. (2000). Konflik Keagenan : Tinjauan Teoritis dan Cara Menguranginya. Retrieved from http://download.garuda.ristekdikti. go.id/article.php?article=58350&val=4378&title=Konflik Keagenan: Tinjauan Teoritis dan Cara Menguranginya
Asikin, Z. (2013). Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Pemerintah dan Swasta Dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur Publik. Mimbar Hukum, 25(1), 55–67.
Awaliyah, S. (2014). Kontrak Karya Dan Perjanjian Karya Pengusahaan Pertambangan Batubara (KK / PKP2B). Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 27, 111–121.
Beqaj, B. (2016). Public Space, public interest and Challenges of Urban Transformation. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ifacol.2016.11.087
Bichler, M., & Paulsen, P. (2018). A principal-agent model of bidding firms in multi-unit auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, (May 2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.06.
Boylu, F., Aytug, H., & Koehler, G. J. (2009). Principal-agent learning. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.01.
Costello, K. W. (2017). Multiyear rate plans from the perspective of the public interest. The Electricity Journal, 30(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2016.12.
Dellaportas, S., & Davenport, L. (2008a). Reflections on the public interest in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(7), 1080–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.06.
Dellaportas, S., & Davenport, L. (2008b). Reflections on the public interest in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.06.
Diamantoudi, E., & Xue, L. (2007). Coalitions, agreements and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 136(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2006.02.
Distanont, A., Khongmalai, O., & Distanont, S. (2018). Innovations in a social enterprise in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.08.
Evstafyev, N. V, & Evstafyev, E. N. (2015). Risks of Concessions for Business : Case Study on the Operation of Sports Facilities. Procedia
Economics and Finance, 23(October 2014), 1060–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00425-
Ferrari, C., Parola, F., & Tei, A. (2015). Governance models and port concessions in Europe: Commonalities, critical issues and policy perspectives. Transport Policy, 41, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tranpol.2015.03.
García, D. (2014). Optimal contracts with privately informed agents and active principals. Journal of Corporate Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcorpfin.2013.12.
Gölpek, F. (2015). Service Sector and Technological Developments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.873
Hadjon, P. M. (2002). Introduction to the Indonesian Administrative Law. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Hakim, T. D. (2014). Strategi Alternatif Manajemen Spektrum Dan Penataan Alokasi Pita Frekuensi 1800 MHz Untuk Penerapan Teknologi LTE. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/222487/ strategi-alternatif-manajemen-spektrum-dan-penataan-alokasi-pitafrekuensi-1800
Hall, J. R. (2005). Comparative Sociology, 1, 391–397.
HR, R. (2002). Hukum Administrasi Negara Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Johnson, N. A., & Cooper, R. B. (2009). Media, affect, concession, and agreement in negotiation: IM versus telephone. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.10.
Justisia, V. (2015). Perjanjian Bangun Guna Serah (Build,Operate And Transfer) Antara Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Dengan Pihak Swasta. Nurani, 15, 73–84.
Kersten, G. E., Vahidov, R., & Gimon, D. (2013a). Concession-making in multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations: Theory and experiments. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.02.
Kersten, G. E., Vahidov, R., & Gimon, D. (2013b). Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Concession-making in multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations : Theory and experiments. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(3), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.02.
Keser, C., & Willinger, M. (2007). Theories of behavior in principal – agent relationships with hidden action, 51, 1514–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.10.
Kirikova, M. (2016). Variable Contents of Enterprise Models. In Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.077
Liu, S., Chen, H., Han, W., & Lin, Y. (2018). Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities to maximize fee revenues with minimal throughput requirements. Transportation Research Part E, 109, 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.08.
Muwahid. (2015). Implikasi Yuridis Kekaburan Makna Kepentingan Umum Dalam Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Al-Hikmah Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(September), 189–200.
Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2018a). Protecting the public interest ? Continuing professional development policies and role-profession conflict in accountancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.
Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2018b). Protecting the public interest? Continuing professional development policies and role-profession conflict in accountancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.
Pratono, A. H., & Sutanti, A. (2016). The ecosystem of social enterprise: Social culture, legal framework, and policy review in Indonesia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.
Pricopie, V. (2013). The Public Interest in Romanian Parliamentary Debate. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92(Lumen), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.752
Purdy, D. E. (1983). The enterprise theory: An Extension, (April 1982), 531–541.
Republik Indonesia. Kitab undang-undang hukum perdata (1836). Indonesia. Republik Indonesia, P. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 38 Tahun 2015 Tentang Kerjasama Pemerintah Dengan Badan Usaha Dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur, Pub. L. No. 38, Menteri Hukum Dan
Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia 37(2015). Indonesia.
Russell, C. L. (2018). 5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications. Environmental Research, 165(October 2017), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envres.2018.01.
Saefudin, A. (2008). Perkembangan Teknologi Komunikasi Perspektif Komunikasi Peradaban. Mediator, 9(2), 383–392. Retrieved fromhttps://ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/mediator/ article/viewFile/1113/689
Supanca, I. (2008). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Kontrak Dalam Pembangunan Dan Pengoperasian Infrastruktur Dengan Pola Bot (Build, Operate And Transfer).
Vernadat, F. (2017). Interoperable Enterprise Systems: Principles, architectures and metrics (Keynote Speech), (November 2004). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16855.27048
Wang, F., Xiong, M., Niu, B., & Zhuo, X. (2018a). Impact of government subsidy on BOT contract design : Price, demand, and concession period. Transportation Research Part B, 110, 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.
Wang, F., Xiong, M., Niu, B., & Zhuo, X. (2018b). Impact of government subsidy on BOT contract design: Price, demand, and concession period. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.
Weichhart, G., & Stary, C. (2017). Project-based learning for complex adaptive enterprise systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 12991–12996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1810
Wiering, M., & Winnubst, M. (2017). The conception of public interest in Dutch flood risk management: Untouchable or transforming? Environmental Science and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsci.2017.03. Zainona, S., Ahmadb, S. A., Atanc, R., Wah, Y. B., Abu Bakar, Z., &
Sarman, S. R. (2014). Legitimacy and sustainability of social enterprise: governance and accountability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20(1), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2014.06.022
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
