Developing an Online Practicum Evaluation Management System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jdsd2023.1.3Keywords:
Online Practicum Evaluation Management System, Efficiency, Rubric, Time-consuming, Rapid Application DevelopmentAbstract
Technology and online systems were enhancing the way people work. An online system for evaluating practicum students is vital as the number of students participating in practicum sessions each semester continues to grow. The traditional method of manual evaluation can be time-consuming and tedious for supervisors, and maintaining and organising student evaluation data can also be a challenge for the university. To overcome these issues, this study aims to create an online evaluation system named "Online Practicum Evaluation Management System". This system will enable supervisors to evaluate students quickly and easily based on the specific rubric without needing to be paper-based. Additionally, the system will provide a secure and organised platform for storing and accessing student evaluation data. This solution aims to enhance the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the practicum program. Rapid Application Developments (RAD) has been used in developing this system. There are four steps in the RAD methodology: requirements gathering, user design, construction, and cutover. Interviews and content analysis were first used to gather the functional requirements. The collected requirements were then used to create a prototype and put through a recorded usability study. The evaluation indicated that OPEMS is practical and straightforward to operate. A majority of respondents are pleased with the system's features. Researchers and developers in this field can use the study as a blueprint for creating similar designs or improving the performance of existing ones. Therefore, the proposed Online Practicum Evaluation Management System will be a more practical, well-organized, faster, reliable, and accurate means of processing the current conventional method of evaluating practicum students.
References
Ana, A., Yulia, C., & Muktiarni, M. (2020). Electronic Rubric: Evaluation Tool in the Assessment Process in Vocational Education. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(6), 3789–3802
Chen, A., & Bryer, D. (2020). The Impact of Learning Management Systems on Student Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Design and Implementation Features. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(3), 1-12.
Joo, Y. J., Kim, Y. K., & Kim, Y. (2015). Impact of online learning on students' attitudes and academic performance. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(1), 1-14.
Kupczynski, K.J., & Leonard, J.M. (2017). Learning Management Systems and Student Engagement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(2), 1-15.
Medina, R. J. S., Separa, L. A. C., & Generales, L. J. (2022). Web-Based System on Evaluating Practicum Experiences of Students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 3723–3733. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/2162/1334
Muktiarni, M., Ana, A., Yulia, C., & Jubaedah, Y. (2019). Electronic Rubrics Design to Assess Student Competence in Vocational Education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 379, 257–261. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.042
Oblinger, J.E., & Oblinger, B.L. (2016). An Analysis of Student Information Systems in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 1-11.
Tetteh, G.W., & Dauda, S.A. (2021). Exploring the Impact of Learning Management System on Student Learning: A Comparative Study of Moodle and Blackboard. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 1-10.
Wang, Q., Chen, W., & Liang, Y. (2016). The impact of online learning on college students. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 1-12.
Yusoff, R., Ahmad, R., & Yahya, K. (2015). The effectiveness of the UUM online learning system (UOLS) on student engagement, satisfaction, and performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(8), 40-48.








