Do Individual Characteristics and Financial Burden Contribute to Health Problems? Evidence from Malaysia

Aza Azlina Md Kassim1*, Mohamad Hafiz Rosli2, Juliza Mohamed3, Zainal Azhar Zainal Azim3

  1. Graduate School of Management, Management and Science University, Selangor
  2. Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Segamat Campus, Johor
  3. Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Selangor, Selangor

Journal of Business Management and Accounting 13(2) (2023) · https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2023.13.2.2

Abstract

The rise in the cost of living is the leading cause of stress. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the impact of financial burdens on health. However, to date, limited studies have examined the relationship between financial burden and cardiovascular disease risk factors, the leading cause of death in the world, including Malaysia. Hence, this study examined the determinants of coronary heart disease (CHD). The study administered a questionnaire on CHD patients in Selangor, the most populated State in Malaysia. A total of 300 valid responses were obtained and analysed using multiple regression analysis. The results showed that accommodation cost, salary, smoking habit, age, residential area, marital status and education level are associated with CHD. Nevertheless, the study did not find support for the relationship between education expenses and employment status on CHD. Based on the results, this study recommends that the government and housing developers increase housing affordability, particularly for low- and middle-income earners. Besides, everyone should enjoy a high quality of life regardless of job type or salary. Health awareness, particularly CHD risk, should be promoted regularly in all communication media to target a wider group, particularly the elderly.

Keywords: Age, coronary heart disease, accommodation cost, salary, education expenses

The definitions of T20, M40, and B40 are based on the Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM, 2014). The T20 (top 20%) income group is the household that has an income above RM8,319 (USD2,377), the income of M40 (middle 40%) group ranges between RM3,856 (USD1,102) and RM8,318 (USD2,376) and B40 (bottom 40%) income groups are households earning monthly incomes below RM3,855 (USD1,101).

their lucrative income. The perception of the rising cost of living by the M40 and B40 income groups also showed the same trend (Che Sulaiman, Sanusi & Muhamad, 2020). The pressure on the rising cost of living would be more glaring among the low- and middle-income earners. The rise in average food prices and housing costs leads lower-income earners to greater financial burdens. According to the World Bank (2020), young workers in Malaysia are facing stagnant growth in employment income even though education qualifications are rising. Most households do not have sufficient financial savings, and financial pressures are felt by most working adults regardless of their age group and location. Therefore, they tend to use debt as a substitute for income to finance growing consumption. Moran, Ommerborn, Blackshear, Sims, and Clark (2019) found that those with moderate to high financial burdens tend to have a higher risk of CHD. Individuals with moderate financial burdens are twice more likely to get CHD, while those with high financial stress are three times more likely to get CHD. This result proves that financial burden or financial stress might lead to adverse physical health, as demonstrated by previous research. Smoking habits contribute to bad health and buying cigarettes also adds to the cost of living (Hiscock et al., 2012). Furthermore, smoking is an important risk factor for heart disease (Wang et al., 2019). This habit will worsen the increased cost of living on health. Previous studies emphasised the influence of education loans on stress levels (Rachel, 2017) and financial burden (Williams, 2016). However, little knowledge is available on the association of financial burden, particularly the accommodation cost and education expenses with CHD (Davey et al., 2022; Safford, 2021). Hence, this study examines the association of individual characteristics (smoking habit, age, residential area, marital status, education level, employment status) and financial burden (accommodation cost, salary, education expenses) with CHD. LITERATURE REVIEW Coronary Heart Disease Individuals with CHD are more likely to experience chest pain, shortness of breath, pain or coldness in the legs or arms, and chest tightness (Rahman, Akter, Zohora & Shibly, 2019; Yang, Wang, Wang & Gong, 2019; and Hertz et al., 2019). These individuals easily feel tired from exercising or engaging in any activity. Other symptoms of CHD include swollen legs, ankles, and feet, as well as feeling weak (Vijayashree & Parveen Sultana, 2020). Researchers have thoroughly investigated the risk factors that lead to CHD, showing that the factors consist of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. According to Gander et al. (2014), the modifiable risk factors that lead to arterial damage are hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and smoking. Meanwhile, the non-modifiable risk factors of CHD are age, sex, and a personal or family history of CHD (Assmann, Cullen, Jasa, Lewis & Mancini, 1999). Adults are shouldered with many financial burdens or financial stress. Very few studies have investigated the relationship between financial burden and CHD. Numerous CHD cases due to modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors have been reported, but not many have linked CHD to financial stress due to the high cost of living. Therefore, it is not clear whether financial burden or financial stress is a factor that leads to CHD. Cohen, Janicki, and Miller (2007) reported stress as being associated with CHD; it triggers the pathogenic process and inflammatory and coagulatory mechanisms. Thus, stress can trigger arterial damage. A lower income and a lack of health insurance are significant causes of financial stress and result in poor or worsening health (Ross, Bradley & Busch, 2006). Accommodation Cost Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs explains that every human being needs a good quality of life. This model also cites physiological need (i.e., shelter) as a basic need (Martin & Joomis, 2007). A house is a shelter that keeps human beings safe from harm. However, it is not easy to own property in this era, as Malaysia’s housing prices increase yearly (Zamri, 2019). Besides, most households in Malaysia have low- or middle-income, which makes it even more difficult for them to own any property (Surendran, 2018). Because of their low income, some adults have to rent a house instead of buying it. Low-income earners are now burdened by the cost of rent (Goodman & Ganesh, 2017). Hence, accommodation cost is a significant financial burden among adults (Rowley, Ong & Haffner, 2015) that causes them financial stress.

Vidyattama, Tanton, and Nepal (2013) noted that housing-related financial stress is associated with income and accommodation costs, namely mortgage repayments and rents. A lower-income earner usually spends 30% cent of his income on accommodation costs, leading to a term called ‘housing stress’ (Yates, 2007). Household debt service in Malaysia is becoming more worrying. This problem affects young adults (Osman, Madzlan & Ing, 2018), doubling their bill payment problems. It could also lead to poverty because most of a person’s earnings to survive day-to-day life. Not much has been reported on accommodation cost stress and health problems. Rodgers et al. (2019) and Bills, West, and Hargrove (2019) recognised accommodation cost burden as one of the main issues affecting human health. When a person feels the difficulty of settling a housing debt, he or she experiences housing stress. Housing stress can be defined as a situation where the household is negatively affected because of their limited income, which hinders them from covering housing costs (NAHP, 2004). Consequently, physical and emotional housing stress leads to poor physical and mental health (Rodgers et al., 2019). Salary Salary often leads to financial stress, especially when a person is incapable of fulfilling his or her financial well-being. Financial stress affects not only the low-income group in Malaysia but also all income levels (Osman, Madzlan & Ing, 2018). According to Akram (2012), salary is an essential financial aspect that supports a family’s livelihood. Usman, Akbar, and Ramzan (2013) reported salary as a significant determinant of job satisfaction, but stress had no significant effect. This result indicates that salary is a primary determinant of human well-being. A low salary might reflect poor life management and subsequently cause financial burden. Few studies have explored the link between salary (or income) and health problems, specifically cardiovascular disease. Elfassy et al. (2019) found that people who experienced a drop in income tended to have double the risk of contracting heart problems and early death. This situation contradicts the results of those with increased salaries or stable incomes. On top of that, researchers have also reported that respondents who were subjected to income reduction had a bigger chance of having a heart attack, stroke, or heart failure. Also, those who earned a low salary had a higher risk of disease and injury rather than high salary earners (Leigh & De Vogli, 2016). Monteiro, Mura, Conde and Popkin (2004) conducted a study on low- and middleincome countries and found that countries earning below $2500 per capita gross domestic product (GDP) were likely to exhibit higher rates of obesity and vice versa. Rehkopf et al. (2018) found contrasting findings in their cross-sectional study. They examined whether or not people who received a higher income tended to have a higher risk of contracting cardiovascular disease. Their results showed that the respondents did not show any risk of getting cardiovascular disease. Franks, Winters, Tancredi and Fiscella (2011) used the Framingham risk score and confirmed that people with low socioeconomic status (SES) tended to have an increased risk of CHD. Meanwhile, Cottini (2011) suggested that low pay could lead to health issues at the workplace, especially for men. A study on a group of Americans found that those with low incomes likely had higher heart disease rates and chronic diseases than those with a stable income (Woolf et al., 2015). One study suggested increasing workers’ wages to improve their health (Leigh & De Vogli, 2016). In so doing, the workers would have reduced stress-related anxiety and depression. Moreover, as for health benefits, higher wages have been linked to improved workers’ attendance and productivity. Individuals may experience financial stress for various reasons, including having to bear the cost of education. The rising cost of higher education has received considerable attention recently (Hemelt & Marcotte, 2011). In Malaysia, people who rely heavily on the study loans provided by the National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) are also affected by financial distress (Wong, Ahmad & Kamisah, 2015). The PTPTN is a Malaysian authority responsible for issuing study loans to students pursuing tertiary education. Although the number of PTPTN borrowers has increased, the loan repayments from graduates are much lower than expected (Wong et al., 2015). This begs the question of whether or not graduates can pay their education loans. This scenario could also stem from the uncertain economic situation nowadays. An HSBC survey revealed an 83% working rate among university students globally. Nine out of ten students work while studying in Malaysia because they need additional money to pay fees and living costs (HSBC, 2018). Graduates with debts have become a serious issue, with many facing difficulties repaying their education loans and other debts they have accumulated since entering the job market (Zainal & Ismail, 2012). Financial distress such as mental or physical discomposure occurs when an individual cannot handle economic resources such as generating income or settling debt repayments or bill payments. A survey conducted by Muslim Volunteer Malaysia (MVM), a student group, indicates that ninety-six per cent of the respondents viewed the economic situation as a burden. Most of them also said that their money was spent paying education fees, especially those studying in private universities, while the balance was spread thinly (Williams, 2016). A survey of 1,500 undergraduates at Universiti Putra Malaysia revealed that many students perceived education loans as a burden. Besides, a significant proportion of the students had a negative attitude towards loan repayment (Abu Bakar, Masud, & Md Jusoh, 2006). Financial distress may influence an individual’s many aspects of life, such as saving attitude, health condition, emotion, productivity level at the workplace, retirement planning, and family (McCarthy, 2011). Skyhigh tuition fees and the rising cost of living are among the factors that influence individual stress levels and also lead to health problems (Rachell, 2017). Age Age refers to lifespan. The risk of heart disease increases with increasing age. Most heart disease cases can be seen in those aged 60 years and above (Kamel Abd, Naser Abd, & Raman, 2019). One possible factor is that ageing people tend to exercise less daily (Sun et al., 2019). Light physical activity is a key factor in reducing CHD risk in older individuals (LaCroix et al., 2019). Less physical activity and increases in age will lead to a higher risk of being overweight and obese. Individuals with obesity have a high risk of contracting hypertension, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases (Wenger, 2014). Smoking All tobacco products contain nicotine, which is a highly addictive psychoactive ingredient. The dried leaves of tobacco are used in cigarettes, bidis, water pipes, and cigars (Muhammad Zubair, 2019). Smoking affects the lungs and the body’s immunity (Muhammad Zubair, 2019). Every year, tobacco kills more than seven million people globally, of which more than 6 million are caused by direct tobacco use. People who smoke have a really bad effect on their surroundings. Around 890,000 deaths are non-smokers that have been exposed to second-hand smoke. The statistics show that 80% of the world’s 1.1 billion smokers are from low- and middle-income countries (World Health Organisation, 2018). Stress resulting from work or studies determines smoking uptake (Wang et al., 2019). Individuals experiencing high stress levels are more likely to smoke and find quitting difficult (Bergman et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019). Besides, residents with a low socioeconomic status often face depression because of the increased cost of living. Unfavourable living conditions may also increase stress levels (Ng, Yeung & Gao, 2019), forcing this group to smoke (Hiscock, Bauld, Amos, Fidler & Munafo, 2012). Those who smoke will feel as if their emotions are under control. They also smoke to protect themselves from undesirable emotions, including stress. In turn, this group will have a higher risk of heart disease (Safford et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2019). Control Variables Regarding the control variables, prior literature, for example, Gupta, Prakash, Gupta & Gupta (1997), suggests that residential area, educational level, marital status and employment status influence CHD. Gupta et al. (1997) suggest that rural area populations are more likely to be correlated with CHD prevalence. CHD cases are significantly greater among uneducated persons (Davey, 2021). Lowincome earners have been associated with worse CHD outcomes as those patients are unable to cover their medical expenses (Safford et al., 2021). Research Framework The research framework of this study is as follows.

Research Framework Theofresearch frameworkand of this study isVol. as13, follows. Journal Business Management Accounting, Number 2 (July) 2023, pp: 181–205

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1

financial burden (accommodation cost, education expenses, salary) and individual characteristics (age and smoking habit) with coronary heart disease (CHD). This study employed a cross-sectional method with purposive sampling involving 307 CHD patients in Selangor, Malaysia (Hejazi, Rajikan & Choong, 2015).

This research distributed the self-administered questionnaires to CHD patients in Selangor. Selangor is located on the South-West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. The population of Selangor was estimated at more than 9.5 million in 2019. According to the Department of Statistics Malaysia (2020), Selangor has been recorded as the state with the highest number of CHD cases at 16,325. The researcher approached the respondents from nine different districts in Selangor, namely Gombak, Hulu Langat, Hulu Selangor, Klang, Kuala Langat, Kuala Selangor, Petaling, Sepang, and Sabak Bernam, to ensure that each district represents the sample population. This step made it easy to collect the data using disproportionate stratified sampling. The patients with CHD are being approached during their visits to the government hospital. Sekaran (2003) suggests that the number of respondents required for regression analysis is ten times the number of variables. For this study, there are ten variables. Thus, at least 100 (10 x 10) subjects are needed. After four (4) months of data collection, the total returned questionnaire was 307. Out of these, seven questionnaires were incomplete, leaving only 300 usable questionnaires. The 300 samples for this study are sufficient for analysis as proposed by Sekaran (2003). Questionnaire Design and Measurements The questionnaire was divided into two sections. The first section consists of respondents’ demographic profiles, including their individual characteristics (age and smoking habit). Meanwhile, the second section consists of questions on CHD, accommodation costs and education expenses. Demographic Profile The questionnaire requires the respondents to provide their demographic profile pertinent to the present study, including salary, age, smoking habit, residential area, marital status, education level and employment status. Salary was measured using three categories; RM3,000 and below; RM3001 to RM7,000; and RM7,001 and above. Meanwhile, age was measured using the mean age of the respondents. Residential area was categorised into rural and urban (Yong & Mahadir Naidu, 2012). The marital status was categorised into married and unmarried (Cheah, Lim & Mohd Yusoff, 2021). Meanwhile, education level was categorised into primary, secondary and tertiary (Cheah, Lim & Mohd Yusoff, 2021; Yong & Mahadir Naidu, 2012). Concerning employment status, it was categorised into government, private, selfemployed, unemployed, and pensioner. The categorisation of the demographic information was kept straightforward. Coronary Heart Disease For CHD, five statements were designed and adapted from Rahman, Akter, Zohora, and Shibly (2019), Yang, Wang, Wang, and Gong

(2019), and Hertz et al. (2019). These statements include, “I sometimes feel chest pain/discomfort,” “I sometimes feel shortness of breath,” I sometimes feel pain in my arms,” “I sometimes feel chest tightness,” and “I have acute coronary heart disease”. The statements were measured using a Likert scale ranging from Strongly disagree (1) to Strongly agree (5). Higher scores indicate more severe CHD conditions. Accommodation Cost Four statements were adapted from Rowley, Ong, and Haffner (2015) to represent accommodation costs. These statements include, “I have difficulties in paying my accommodation cost,” “I have difficulties paying the expenses (instalment, taxes, insurance, maintenance) related to my house,” “I spend most of my salary on housing,” and “I feel stressed because of my accommodation cost”. The statements were measured using a Likert scale ranging from Very poor (1) to Outstanding (5). Higher scores indicate a higher level of difficulty in paying accommodation expenses. Education Expenses Regarding education expenses, four statements were adapted from Zainal and Ismail (2012). The statements are “I feel burdened because of having to pay the education expenses,” “I have difficulties paying the education expenses every month,” “I cannot afford to pay the education expenses every month,” and “It is very hard for me to exclude some portion of my salary to pay the education expenses”. Assessment of Reliability, Normality and Collinearity Diagnostics Test Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. The results, shown in Table 1, indicate that all items in the questionnaire had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of more than 0.70. Hair, Black, Babin, and Anderson (2010) stated that Cronbach’s alpha coefficient above 0.70 is acceptable, while a value above 0.8 is considered good. The results indicate that the questionnaire was reliable at measuring the targeted variables for this study.

Table 1. Reliability Test Analysis
ConstructCronbach’s Number of Items Number of
AlphaCases Deleted
Coronary heart disease0.8105-
Accommodation cost0.9224-
Education expenses0.9494-

Further, the assessment of normality of the metric variables in this study involves empirical measures of a distribution’s shape characteristics (skewness and kurtosis). Table 2 shows that the normality assessment values for accommodation cost, salary, education expenses, age, smoking habit and coronary heart disease (CHD) are between ±2.00 as suggested by Hair et al. (2015). Therefore, this assessment confirmed that the data of this study is normally distributed.

Table 2. Normality Test
ConstructSkewnessKurtosis
Coronary heart disease-0.9161.961
Accommodation cost-0.219-0.809
Salary-0.105-0.635
Education expenses0.548-0.994
Age-0.1270.675
Smoking habit0.912-1.175
Residential area-1.101-0.426
Marital status-1.8641.485
Education level0.351-1.002
Employment status0.311-0.952

Next, a collinearity diagnostics test (tolerance and VIF values) was conducted to check for multicollinearity. The results from Table 3 show that the tolerance values are greater than 0.10, and the VIF values are lower than 10; hence, no multicollinearity problem exists (Pallant, 2016).

Table 3. Collinearity Diagnostics Results
ConstructCollinearity Statistics
ToleranceVIF
Accommodation cost0.8891.125
Salary0.9181.090
Education expenses0.8901.123
Age07581.320
Smoking habit0.9381.006
Residential area0.9211.086
Marital status0.8281.208
Education level0.8721.147
Employment status0.8391.191

The profiles of the respondents are summarised in Table 4. In this study, Klang District represented the most number of respondents (98 respondents, 32.7%), followed by Petaling (42 respondents, 14%). In terms of gender, the majority of the respondents were male (181 respondents, 60.3%). Nearly 75% of the respondents were 46 years and above, and most were married. Regarding education, 127 respondents or 42.4% of the sample had tertiary education level. Most of the respondents (61%) earned RM3,000 and below. In terms of employment, majority of the respondents worked in the Private Sector. The data shows that 82 respondents (27%) were from the Private Sector, followed by 64 respondents (21.3%) that were selfemployed. The result also indicates that 64.3% of the respondents had family members with CHD, and 63% has had the disease for less than five years.

Table 4. Respondent Profile
CharacteristicFrequencyPercentage (%)
LocalityGombak3812.7
Hulu Langat258.3
Hulu Selangor206.7
Klang9832.7
Kuala Langat155.0
Kuala Selangor3311.0
Petaling4214.0
Sepang237.7
Sabak Bernam62.0
Residential areaUrban20167.0
Rural9933.0
GenderMale18160.3
Female11939.7
Age20 and below10.30
21–354113.7
36–453411.3
46–5510535.0
56–658829.4
66 and above3110.3
Marital statusMarried24882.7
Unmarried5217.3
Education levelPrimary3812.7
Secondary13544.9
Tertiary12742.4
Household incomeRM3,000 and below18361.0
RM3,001–RM7,00010133.7
RM7,001 and above165.3
Employment statusGovernment Sector6020.0
Private Sector8227.3
Self-employed6722.3
Unemployed5317.7
Pensioner3812.7
Do you have any familyYes19364.3
members with coronary heart disease?No10735.7
How long have you had heartLess than 5 years18963.0
disease?More than 5 years11137.0
Housing occupancy statusOwner22675.3
Tenant6521.7
Others93.0
Do you have any educationYes5618.7
loan?No24481.3
Are you smoking?Yes8829.3
No21270.7

As shown in Table 5, the result indicates that the mean figure for coronary heart disease is 3.46. The mean value for accommodation cost is 2.8, ranging from 1.00 to 5.00. The mean value for salary and education expenses is 2.98 and 2.91, respectively. Regarding control variables, the mean marital status, education level and employment status are 0.820, 2.306 and 2.790, respectively.

Table 5. Descriptive Statistics
VariablesMeanSDMinMax
Coronary heart disease3.460.741.005.00
Accommodation cost2.801.021.005.00
Salary2.980.891.005.00
Education expenses2.911.071.005.00
Age51.9214.2517.0097.00
Smoking0.2930.4560.001.00
Residential area0.75670.42980.001.00
Marital status0.8200.3820.001.00
Education level2.3060.68371.003.00
Employment status2.7901.3441.006.00

Multiple Regression Analysis

The research hypotheses were tested via multiple regression analysis. This step helps answer the main objective of the study. The reported measures of variation, R2, indicate that 17.0% of the total variation in CHD can be explained by accommodation cost, salary, age, smoking habit, residential area, marital status and education level. This low value indicates many other factors that contribute to CHD. The multiple regression result and significant coefficients are shown in

Table 6. Table 6
PredictorBSEt-statistics
Constant2.1070.3226.542***
Accommodation cost0.1250.0403.068***
Salary0.1510.0463.277***
Education expenses-0.0560.042-1.336
Age0.0120.0033.655***
Smoking0.1640.0891.841**
Residential area-0.1990.094-2.110**
Marital status0.1250.0731.724**
Education level-0.0300.017-1.770**
Employment status0.0210.0320.650
R-squared (R2)0.170
Adjusted R-squared0.144
F-statistic6.601
Significance F0.000
***, **, * respectively indicate that the regression analysis is statistically significant at 1%, 5%, 10%

***, **, * respectively indicate that the regression analysis is statistically significant at 1%, 5%, 10%

In Table 6, the result shows that the relationship between accommodation cost and CHD is positive (B = 0.114, t = 2.833, p < 0.01) and is statistically significant at a 1% level. Therefore, this finding leads to the acceptance of H1. This signifies that when accommodation costs increase, CHD cases also increase. Further, as it can be observed from the results in Table 6, salary is positively related to CHD (B = 0.125, t = 2.833, p < 0.01), and it is significant at the 1% level. Therefore, H2 is supported. This result indicates that highincome earners are exposed to high responsibilities and excessive stress, leading to a high risk of a heart attack. With regards to age, the study finds a positive correlation between age and CHD (B = 0.015, t = 5.355, p < 0.01) at 1% significance level. Thus, H3 is supported. It demonstrates that individuals of higher age have more tendency to get CHD. Besides, the result shows a positive relationship between smoking habit and CHD (B = 0.173, t = 1.980, p < 0.05) at 5% significance, and it leads to the acceptance of H5. It indicates that smokers have a higher risk of heart disease. Nevertheless, the result finds negative but insignificant relationship between education expenses and CHD (B = -0.064, t = 1.512, p > 0.1). Meanwhile, the residential area and education level show negative relationship with CHD at 5% significance level. Regarding marital status, it indicates a positive association with CHD (B = 0.125, t = 1.724, p < 0.05). Nevertheless, employment status shows insignificant relationship with CHD (B = 0.021, t = 0.651, p > 0.1). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION This study aimed to determine the factors that influence CHD. The analysis of 300 CHD patients in Selangor generated interesting results. The results show that accommodation cost, salary, age, smoking habit, residential area, marital status and education level are associated with CHD. Nevertheless, education expenses and employment status did not influence CHD. The current finding on accommodation cost is consistent with that of Rodgers et al. (2019), i.e., CHD is influenced by the burden of accommodation cost. Lower-income earners who spend a large portion of their income to pay for accommodation are more likely to consume unhealthy diets (Kirkpatrick & Tarasuk, 2011). This habit further impacts their health. Salary has been found to correlate with CHD positively, but Elfassy et al. (2019) and Leigh and De Vogli (2016) found the opposite. The reason may be that a high salary comes with high responsibilities. High-income earners are exposed to excessive work pressure and high expectations from various stakeholders, which, in turn, affect their health. Additionally, the result of this study showed that older people had a higher risk of getting CHD. As this group ages, their vascular elasticity reduces, blood viscosity increases, and the incidence of CHD increases, threatening their health (Wenger, 2014). On the other hand, education expenses were not proven to affect CHD. One possible reason is that this loan is paid monthly, starting from a small amount and increasing based on the agreement. Moreover, the education expenses are not as expensive as accommodation costs, so it is less burdensome. Rural residents have barriers to accessing high-quality health care and facilities compared to urbanites (Safford, 2021). It worsens the CHD outcomes. The result also indicates that low income and low education levels lead to a high risk of CHD due to severe stress in living under a cloud of money. In addition, married individuals are found to have more CHD prevalence than unmarried individuals. In essence, married individuals are likely to face more challenges with their spouses, children, finances, and employers. For instance, they need more money to provide good shelter, food, clothes, education and medical to their family members. Based on the results and discussions above, this study recommends that the government introduce policies to lower accommodation costs. This step could lessen the CHD risk in the population. Furthermore, people with low income, disabilities, and unstable employment are the ones most in need of help from the government and the housing developers. Such help would alleviate their burden related to housing and health issues. Additionally, it is high time that all organisations implement flexible or reduced working hours. Long working hours have adversely affected workers’ health (Wong, Chan & Ngan, 2019). This study shows the importance of having a good quality of life regardless of the type of job or salary. Health awareness, particularly CHD risk, should be disseminated regularly via every available communication media to target a wider group, especially the elderly. As the cost of living keeps increasing faster than income growth, the health problem driven by financial burden is expected to be a significant issue in society. Financial burden, particularly the accommodation cost, does associate with individual health. Salary and individual age also contribute to health issues. Therefore, government, businesses and employers have essential roles in ensuring that all citizens/ employees are getting paid commensurate with their contributions. There are several limitations to this study. Numerous other factors may influence CHD. For future research, a clinical diagnostic test should be conducted to diagnose CHD. Besides, researchers might increase the number of samples by using cluster sampling, including other states. In addition, other factors represent financial burdens such as medical costs, transportation costs, food and personal expenses that could be investigated for future research. More moderating variables may also be included, for instance, categories of smokers, housing occupancy status and alcohol drinkers/non-drinkers to enhance the body of knowledge in CHD studies. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank the Selangor State Government for funding this paper under grant no: GPNS/18/01_UNISEL011.

References

  1. Abu Bakar, E., Masud, J., & Md Jusoh, Z. (2006). Knowledge, attitude and perceptions of university students towards educational loans in Malaysia. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 27, 692–701.
  2. Akram, A. A. (2012). Impact of financial rewards on employee’s motivation and satisfaction in pharmaseutical industry, Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(17), 44-49.
  3. Assmann, G., Cullen, P., Jossa, F., Lewis, B., & Mancini, M. (1999). Coronary heart disease: reducing the risk the scientific background to primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease a worldwide view. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 19(8), 1819–1824.
  4. Bergman, H. E., Chan, P. K., Cooper, A., Shirley E., Goto, T., Fine, T., Cohen, G. H., Sampson, L., Ganocy, S., Tamburrino, M., Liberzon, I., Calabrese, J., Galea, S., & Fenny, N. C. (2019). Examining the relationship between PTSD symptomatology and cigarette smoking among Ohio army national guard soldiers. Journal of Military Behavioral Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2018.1556139.
  5. Bills, K. L., West, S. M., & Hargrove, J. (2019). Housing cost burden and maternal stress among very low income mothers. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 46(1), 73-89.
  6. Cheah, Y. K., Lim K. H. & Mohd Yusoff, M. F. (2021). Demographics, knowledge and smoking: An instrumental variable approach. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 11(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2021.11.2.1
  7. Che Sulaiman, N. F., Sanusi, N. F., And Muhamad, S. (2020). Survey dataset of Malaysian perception on rising cost of living. Data in Brief, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104910
  8. Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. JAMA, 298(14), 1685.
  9. Cottini, E. (2011). Health at work and low pay: A European perspective. The Manchester School, 80(1), 75–98
  10. Davey, B., Sinha, R. Ji, H. L., Gauthier, M., & Flores, G. (2021). Social determinants of health and outcomes for children and adults with congenital heart disease: A systematic review. Pediatric Research, 89, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41390-020-01196-6
  11. Department of Statistics Malaysia (2014). Household Income and Basic Amenity Survey, 2014. Retrieved from: https://www. dosm. gov.my/v1/index.php
  12. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Statistics on causes of death, Malaysia, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov. my/v1
  13. Elfassy, T., Swift, S. L., Glymour, M. M., Calonico, S., Jacobs, D. R., Mayeda, E. R., & Zeki Al-Hazzouri, A. (2019). Associations of income volatility with incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in a US cohort. Circulation, 2, 850-859.
  14. Franks, P., Winters, P. C., Tancredi, D. J., & Fiscella, K. A. (2011). Do changes in traditional coronary heart disease risk factors over time explain the association between socio-economic status and coronary heart disease? BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 11(28), https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-11-28.
  15. Gander, J., Sui, X., Hazlett, L. J., Cai, B., Hébert, J. R., & Blair, S. N. (2014). Factors related to coronary heart disease risk among men: validation of the Framingham risk score. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11, E140.
  16. Goodman, L., & Ganesh, B. (2017, June 14). Low-income homeowners are as burdened by housing costs as renters. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/low-income-homeowners-are-burdened-housing-costs-renters.
  17. Gupta, R., Prakash, H., Gupta, V. P., & Gupta, K. D. (1997). Prevalence and determinants of coronary heart disease in a rural population of India. Journal of Clin Epidemiol, 50(2), 203-209.
  18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  19. Hair Jr, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. J. (2015). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.
  20. Hejazi, N., Rajikan, R., & Choong, L. K. (2015). Framingham coronary heart disease and cardiovascular risk assessments of HIV/aids Malaysian population on haart: the importance of risks evaluations and predictions. Sex Transm Infect, 91(Suppl 2), 221-222.
  21. Hemelt, S. W., & Marcotte, D. E. (2011). The impact of tuition increases on enrollment at public colleges and universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(4), 435-457. DOI: 10.3102/0162373711415261
  22. Hertz, J. T., Sakita, F. M., Manavalan, P., Mmbaga, B. T., Thielman, N. M., & Staton, C. A. (2019). Knowledge, attitudes, and preventative practices regarding ischemic heart disease among emergency department patients in northern Tanzania. Public Health, 175, 60-67.
  23. Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012). Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1248, 107–123.
  24. HSBC (2018). Nine out of 10 Malaysian students work while studying: HSBC survey. Retrieved from https://www. thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/08/27/nine-out-of-10-Malaysian-students-work-while-studying-hsbc-survey/#06tZKGriMmdA4dRH.99.
  25. Kamel Abd, R., Naser Abd, S., & Raman, V. (2019). Tracing the risk factors of heart diseases at Al-Nasiriyah heart center in Iraq. Cardiovasc Disease Res, 10(1), 31-34.
  26. Kirkpatrick, S. I., Tarasuk, V. (2011). Housing circumstances are associated with household food access among low-income urban families. Journal of Urban Health, 88, 284–296.
  27. Lacroix, A. Z., Bellettiere, J., Rillamas-Sun, E., Di, C.
  28. Evenson, K. R., Lewis, C. E., Buchner, D. M., Stefanick, M. L., Lee, I. M., Rosenberg, D. E., & Lamonte, M. J. (2019). Association of light physical activity measured by accelerometry and incidence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease in older women. JAMA Netw Open. 2(3). doi:10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2019.0419.
  29. Leigh, J. P., & De Vogli, R. (2016). Low wages as occupational health hazards. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(5), 444-447.
  30. Loh, F. F. (2019, Oct 31). Heart attack leading cause of death. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/10/31/ heart-attack-leading-cause-of-death.
  31. Maceda, C. (2017, January 15). Rise in living costs top cause of stress, but UAE residents ‘satisfied’ with life. Retrieved from https://www.gulfnews.com
  32. Martin, D., & Joomis, K. (2007). Building teachers: a constructivist approach to introducing. Education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
  33. Mccarthy, Y. (2011). Behavioral characteristics and financial distress. Working Paper Series, 1303, European Central Bank.
  34. Monteiro, C. A., Moura, E. C., Conde, W. L., & Popkin, B. M. (2004). Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(12), 940–946.
  35. Moran, K. E., Ommerborn, M. J., Blackshear, C. T., Sims, M., & Clark, C. R. (2019). Financial stress and risk of coronary heart disease in the Jackson heart study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(2), 224–231.
  36. Muhammad Zubair, T. (2019). Smoking and its risks in Saudi Arabia: Literature review. Hamdan Medical Journal. DOI: 10.4103/2227-2437.241549.
  37. NAHP (2004). Housing affordability: A summary of evidence and issues in measurement, national affordable housing project. Report prepared for AHURI and Policy Research Working Group.
  38. Ng, S. M., Yeung, C. H., & Gao, S. (2019). A concise self-report scale can identify high expressed emotions and predict higher relapse risk in schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 89, 1–6.
  39. Nobari, T. Z., Whaley, S. E., Blumenberg, E., Prelip, M. L., & Wang, M. C. (2019). Severe housing-cost burden and obesity among preschool-aged low-income children in Los Angeles County. Preventive Medicine Reports, 13, 139–145.
  40. Osman, Z., Madzlan, E. M., & Ing, P. (2018). In pursuit of financial well-being: The effects of financial literacy, financial behaviour and financial stress on employees in Labuan. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 3(1), 56-94.
  41. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. (6th Ed.). Crows Nest. NSW: Allen &Unwin.
  42. Rachell, P. (2017). University debts so high students are suffering ‘increased mental health problems’ and ‘can’t afford food’. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/ university-debts-so-high-students-suffering-increased-mental-health-problems-cant-afford-food-a7587656.html
  43. Rahman, M., Akter, S., Zohora, F. T., & Shibly, A. Z. (2019). Public knowledge of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Tangail, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 6(5), 1838-1842.
  44. Rehkopf, D. H., Burmaster, K., Landefeld, J. C., Adler-Milstein, S., Flynn, E. P., Acevedo, M. C., & Fernald, L. C. H. (2018). The impact of a private sector living wage intervention on consumption and cardiovascular disease risk factors in a middle income country. BMC Public Health, 18(179), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5052-2.
  45. Rodgers, J., Briesacher, B. A., Wallace, R. B., Kawachi, I., Baum, C. F., & Kim, D. (2019). County-level housing affordability in relation to risk factors for cardiovascular disease among middle-aged adults: The National Longitudinal Survey of Youths 1979. Health & Place, 59, doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.10219.
  46. Ross, J. S., Bradley, E. H., & Busch, S. H. (2006) Use of health care services by lower income and higher-income uninsured adults. JAMA, 295, 2027–2036.
  47. Rowley, S., Ong, R., & Haffner, M. (2015). Bridging the gap between housing stress and financial stress: The Case of Australia. Housing Studies, 30(3), 473-490.
  48. Safford, M. M., Reshetnyak, E., Sterling, M. R., Richman, J. S., Muntner, P. M., Durant, R. W., Booth, J., & Pinheiro, L. C. (2021). Number of social determinants of health and fatal and nonfatal incident coronary heart disease in the REGARDS study. Circulation, 1, 143:244–253. https://doi.10.1161/ Circulationaha.120.048026
  49. Sun, L., Zhuang, L. P., Li, X. Z., Zheng, J., & Wu, W. F. (2019). Tai Chi can prevent cardiovascular disease and improve cardiopulmonary function of adults with obesity aged 50 years and older. Medicine (Baltimore), 98(42), 1-5.
  50. Surendran, S. (2018). Household across Malaysia face ‘different realities’ on income. The Edge, Retrieved from https://www. theedgemarkets.com/article/households-across-malaysia-face-different-realities-income-0
  51. The World Bank (2020). Aspirations unfulfilled: Malaysia’s cost of living challenges. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/ en/country/malaysia/publication/
  52. Usman, S., Akbar, M. T., & Ramzan, M. (2013). Effect of salary and stress on job satisfaction of teachers in district Sialkot, Pakistan. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 15(2), 68-74.
  53. Vidyattama, Y., Tanton, R., & Nepal, B. (2013). The effect of transport costs on housing-related financial stress in Australia. Urban Studies, 50(9), 1779–1795.
  54. Vijayashree, J., & Parveen Sultana, H. (2020). Heart disease classification using hybridized Ruzzo-Tompa memetic based deep trained Neocognitron neural network. Health and Technology, 10, 207–216.
  55. Wang, X., Zhang, T., Wu, J., Yin, S., Nan, X., Du, M., Liu, A., & Wang, P. (2019). The association between socioeconomic status, smoking, and chronic disease in inner Mongolia in Northern China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 169.Wenger, N. K. (2014). Prevention of cardiovascular disease: Highlights for the clinician of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Clinical Cardiology, 37, 239–51.
  56. Williams, G. (2016). Studying the effects of student poverty. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/2016/01/123401/studying-effects-student-poverty
  57. Wong, K., Chan, A. H. S., & Ngan, S. C. (2019). The effect of long working hours and overtime on occupational health: A meta-analysis of evidence from 1998 to 2018. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(12), 1-22.
  58. Wong, S. K., Ahmad, N., & Kamisah, I. (2015). Education loan repayment and performances: The Malaysian graduates perspectives. Journal of Southeast Asia Studies, 20, 158-172.
  59. Woolf, H. S., Aron, L., Dubay, L., Simon, S. M., Zimmerman, E., & Luk, K. X. (2015). How are income and wealth linked to health and longevity? Urban Institute. Retrieved from webarchive. urban.org/UploadedPDF/2000178.
  60. World Health Organization (2018, March 9). Tobacco. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco
  61. World Health Organization (2017, May 17). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
  62. Yang, R., Wang, Y., Wang, B., & Gong, L. (2019). Exploring the pan-relationship between disease and symptom related to coronary heart disease from Chinese electronic medical records. Proceedings of the 15th Int Con ICIC 2019 (pp. 235–243). China: Springer.
  63. Yates, J. (2007). Housing affordability and financial stress, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Sydney Research Centre, Research Paper No 6.
  64. Yong, K. C. & Mahadir Naidu, B. (2012). Exploring Factors Influencing Smoking Behaviour in Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13, 1125-1130. doi.org/10.7314/ APJCP.2012.13.4.1125
  65. Zainal, N. R., & Ismail, N. (2012). Debt composition and attitude towards education loan among Malaysian graduates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 280-286.
  66. Zamri, A. M. (2019). Homeownership gaps among the middle-income group in Malaysia. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 5(2), 50-62.