Countering Fake BSY Noni Black Hair Magic in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/gbmr2019.11.1.9305Keywords:
Fake products, LLC Health Care Global, Genuine, None Black Hair Magic, Counterfeit, Hair DyeAbstract
Choong Li Li is the sole owner of LLC Health Care Global company in Malaysia. Choong Li Li started the company in 2012 using her personal savings of RM30 000. She is assisted by four staff. In 2014, BSY Group China appointed LLC Healthcare Global as the sole distributor for BSY Noni Black Hair Magic in Malaysia. BSY which stands for Beautiful, Salubrious and Young has quite a big market share in the hair dye market in Malaysia. Unfortunately, the product was quickly copied by competitors using the same brand name BSY Noni Black Hair Magic as well as same BSY green colour packaging. The counterfeit product was priced much lower than the genuine BSY Noni Black Hair Magic product. Consumers found it difficult to differentiate the genuine from the fake product.
Because of the rampant and countrywide sale of counterfeit BSY Noni Black Hair Magic product as well competition from other brands, LLC Healthcare Global found it very challenging to maintain the BSY Noni Black Hair Magic market share in Malaysia. On top of that, LLC Healthcare Global has to meet its annual sales target of RM 1 million. Meeting the sales target was very important for her to maintain her BSY Noni Black Hair Magic sole distribution right in Malaysia. Choong Li Li has to find ways to meet her sales quota for the year as well as figure out long term strategies to overcome the ever present fake BSY Noni Black Hair Magic that flooded the hair dye market.
Downloads
References
Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2009). An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. Journal of business research, 62(3), 368-378.
Bloch, P. H., Bush, R. F., & Campbell, L. (1993). Consumer “accomplices†in product counterfeiting: a demand side investigation. Journal of consumer marketing, 10(4), 27- 36.
Bush, R. F., Bloch, P. H., & Dawson, S. (1989). Remedies for product counterfeiting. Business Horizons, 32(1), 59-66.
Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick Jr, R. L. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41-53.
Eisend, M., & Schuchert-Güler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: A review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2006, 1.
Furnham, A., & Valgeirsson, H. (2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(5), 677-685.
Gentry, J. W., Putrevu, S., & Shultz, C. J. (2006). The effects of counterfeiting on consumer search. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(3), 245-256.
Gentry, J. W., Putrevu, S., II, C. S., & Commuri, S. (2001). How now Ralph Lauren? The separation of brand and product in a counterfeit culture. ACR North American Advances.
Hoon Ang, S., Sim Cheng, P., Lim, E. A., & Kuan Tambyah, S. (2001). Spot the difference: consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of consumer Marketing, 18(3), 219- 235.
Leisen, B., & Nill, A. (2001, January). Combating product counterfeiting: An investigation into the likely effectiveness of a demand-oriented approach. In American Marketing
115
Keong & Mohd Nor Global Business Management Review 11(1)
Association. Conference Proceedings (V ol. 12, p. 271). American Marketing Association.
Phau, I., Sequeira, M., & Dix, S. (2009). Consumers' willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 262-281.
Tom, G., Garibaldi, B., Zeng, Y., & Pilcher, J. (1998). Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 405-421.
Wee, C. H., Ta, S. J., & Cheok, K. H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: An exploratory study. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19-46.
Wilcox, K., Kim, H. M., & Sen, S. (2009). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands?. Journal of marketing research, 46(2), 247-259.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.