Exploring audit quality at the Inland Revenue Board Malaysia
Keywords:Audit quality, Audit Settlement, Aging Audit case, Audit Compentency
Audit quality at the Inland Revenue Board Malaysia (IRBM) is a crucial element in the audit process to ensure no violation of tax reporting by the taxpayers. Hence, it is important to understand whether tax auditors perceive audit quality equally. Furthermore, recognizing the level of audit quality is also important to assist the tax authority in strategizing their efforts. This triggers researchers to embark on this exploratory study through document review and interviews. Data gathered were analysed using descriptive and thematic analysis. Results indicate that there is different perception of audit quality among tax officers, namely competency to detect the amount of audit settlement, audit settlement within the time frame and the achievement of the given key performance indicators (KPIs). The findings further indicate that the level of audit quality is quite alarming particularly with reference to the number of aging cases. The findings from this study provide an insight to the IRBM in their effort to streamline the direction of the tax auditors in improving audit quality.
Abbott, L. J., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Internal Audit Quality and Financial Reporting Quality: The Joint Importance of Independence and Competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12099.
Ado, A. B., Rashid, N., Mustapha, U. A., & Ademola, L. S. (2020). The Impact of Audit Quality on the Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Nigeria. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(9), 37-42.
Aldhizer III, G. R., Miller, J. R., & Moraglio, J. F. (1995). Common Attributes of Quality Audits. Journal of Accountancy, 179(1), 61.
Al-Khaddash, H., Al Nawas, R., & Ramadan, A. (2013). Factors Affecting the Quality of Auditing: The Case of Jordanian Commercial Banks. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11).
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Best, P.J., Shailer, G. E. P., & Fielder, B. A. (2011). Auditing, Assurance Service and Ethics in Australia. 8th Edition. Pearson. Australia.
Asmara, R. Y. (2016). Effect of Competence and Motivation of Auditors of the Quality of Audit: Survey on the External Auditor Registered Public Accounting Firm in Jakarta in Indonesia. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 4(1), 43-76.
Bedard, J. C., Johnstone, K. M., & Smith, E. F. (2010). Audit Quality Indicators: A Status Update on Possible Public Disclosures and Insights from Audit Practice. Current Issues in Auditing, 4(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia.2010.4.1.C12.
Boakai, J. R. & Phon, S. (2020). The Perceived Need for Audit and Audit Quality in the Public Sector: A Study of Public Corporations in Liberia. Master’s dissertation, Kristianstad University. https://researchportal.hkr.se/en/studentTheses.
Boon, K., McKinnon, J., & Ross, P. (2008) Audit Service Quality in Compulsory Audit Tendering: Preparer Perceptions and Satisfaction. Accounting Research Journal 21: 93–122.
De Angelo, L. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (3), 189–199.
Greenbank, P. (2000). Training Micro‐Business Owner‐managers: A Challenge to Current Approaches. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(7), 403-411.
Hussin, M. R. A., Alias, R. A., & Ismail, K. (2013). An Action Research Approach for the Development of Cost Management Skills Training Programme among the Owners of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 91, 515-521.
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385-421.
Further reading KPMG (2016), “Global Profiles of Fraudster: Technology Enables and Weak Controls Fuel the Fraud”, pp. 1-28.
Lee, S. C., Su, J. M., Tsai, S. B., Lu, T. L., & Dong, W. (2016). A Comprehensive Survey of Government Auditors’ Self-Efficacy and Professional Development for Improving Audit Quality. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-25.
Mardijuwono, A. W., & Subianto, C. (2018). Independence, Professionalism, Professional Skepticism: The Relation toward the Resulted Audit Quality. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(9), 2443–4175. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-000.
Mock, T. & Samet, M. (1982). A Multi-Attribute Model for Audit Evaluation. In Proceedings of the VI University of Kansas Audit Symposium.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualittaive Methods, 16(1).
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1-21.
Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting Research Interviews. Management Research Review, 35/3/4: 260–71. DOI: 10.1108/01409171211210154.
Salehi, M., Moradi, M. & Paiydarmanesh, N. (2017). The Effect of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality on Disclosure Quality: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 25(1), pp. 32-48.
Samelson, D., Lowensohn, S., & Johnson, L. E. (2006). “The Determinants of Perceived Audit Quality and Auditee Satisfaction in Local Government.” Journal of Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 18(2): 139-166.
Schoeroeder, M. S., Salamon, J. & Vickey. D. W. (1986). “Audit Quality: The Perception of Audit Committee, Chairperson and Audit Partners”. Auditing: A Journal Practice and Theory. Vol. 13 Supplement.
Soltani, B. (2014). The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 251-274.
Supriyatin, E., Ali, I. M., & Indradewa, R. (2019). Analysis of Auditor Competencies and Job Satisfaction on Tax Audit Quality Moderated by Time Pressure (Case Study of Indonesian Tax Officers). International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(1), 119-136.
Sutton, S. G. (1993). Toward an Understanding of the Factors Affecting the Quality of the Audit Process. Decision Sciences, 24 (1):88-105.
Sutton, S., & Lampe, J. (1990, February). Formulating a Process Measurement System for Audit Quality. In Proceedings of University of Southern California Audit Judgment Symposium.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.