Deposit Money Banks Stocks Return Reactions to Post Financial Crisis Stress Test Result Announcements in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/gbmr2018.10.1.11049Keywords:
Stress Test, Announcements, Post-CrisisAbstract
The study examined the impact of post-financial crisis stress test results announcements on stock return of DMBs in Nigeria over a thirty-One (31) days event window and one hundred (100) days estimation window, for the period June 2013 to June 2016. The secondary data used in the study was analyzed using event study methodology for a sample of 15 DMBs drawn from population of twenty-two DMBs in Nigeria. The residuals of abnormal returns over the event window were subjected to diagnostic tests for serial correlation, normality and heteroskedasticity, the results indicated that the model was correctly specified. The result of test of hypotheses indicated that there is no significant CAR before, on the days and after post crisis stress test results announcements on stock returns of DMBs in Nigeria. Thus, the study concluded that stress test result announcements post financial crisis has a positive insignificant abnormal return before and on the day of announcements but negative insignificant abnormal returns after the announcements on DMBs return on stocks post financial crisis period in Nigeria.
Downloads
References
Bertrand, C. and Amadou N. R. S. (2014) What Matters Most in the Design of Stress Tests? Evidence from U.S. and the Europe. IPAG Business School working paper series 2014-609.
Colligan, B., A. (20160 Do Investors Value the Required Stress Tests of Financial Holding Companies? Finance Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 27.
Dimitrios, F (2014) EU-wide Stress Tests on the Investor’s Point of View. International Hellenic University, Executive MBA 2013-2014 dissertation.
DÃtÄ›, B. M. (2015) Impact of Stress Testing on Bank Risk. Master’s Thesis submitted to Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University in Prague.
Gick, W., and Pausch, T. (2012) ‘Persuasion by Stress Testing – Optimal Disclosure of Supervisory Information in the Banking Sector’, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No. 32/2012.
Goldstein, I., and Sapra, H. (2014). Should Banks' Stress Test Results be Disclosed? An Analysis of the Costs and Benefits. FNT in Finance Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 8(1), 1-54. doi:10.1561/0500000038
Hirtle, B., Kovner, A., & Zeller, S. (2016, April 4). Are Stress Tests Still Informative? Liberty Street Economics. http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/04/are-stress-tests- stillinformative. Html
Küçükkocaoğlu,G., Ünalmış, D. and Ünalmış, I (2013) How do Banks’ Stock Returns Respond to Monetary Policy Committee Announcements in Turkey? Evidence from Traditional versus New Monetary Policy Episodes. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey working paper no: 13/30
Leeuw, M. D (2012) Stress tests: Preventing banks from failure even if they fail it: A study on the results, effects and implications of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program.
Mohammed, I. (2013). Stock prices behaviour around banks bailout announcement in Nigeria. Journal of Monetary and Economic Integration, 12 (2)
Neretina, E., Sahin, C. and de Haan, J. (2014) Banking stress test effects on returns and risks. De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 419.
Pamela, P. (1989) Event studies: A review of issues and methodology", Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 28, 36-66.
Petrella, G. and Resti, A. (2013) Supervisors as Information Producers: Do Stress Tests Reduce Bank Opaqueness? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37:12, pp.5406–5420.
Umar, K., Babakatun, M. A. and Shakur, I. F. (2016) Impaired Loans Purchase Announcement and Stock Return of Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria. Lapai Journal of Management Science.
Vasilopoulos, C. (2013). Financial Stress Testing: A model based exploration under deep uncertainty. Being Master Engineering and Policy Analysis (Msc EPA) Thesis Project submitted to Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.