Behind the Bargain: Some Selected Legal Theories in Contract Law

Farihana Abdul Razak; Zuhairah Ariff  Abd Ghadas; Norhasliza  Ghapa; Amylia Fuziana Azmi

doi:10.32890/aseanli2024.1.1

Authors

Farihana Abdul Razak Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, Perak, Malaysia
Zuhairah Ariff Abd Ghadas Faculty of Law and International Relations, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Norhasliza Ghapa Faculty of Law and International Relations, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Amylia Fuziana Azmi Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Negeri Sembilan Branch, Seremban Campus, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/aseanli2024.1.1

Keywords:

Contract, bargain, fairness, contractual obligation

Abstract

A contract is an enforceable promise between two or more parties, and when they agree to engage in the promise, they are consenting to create a contractual relationship. Therefore, there are legal theories in contract law that highlight contractual obligations from the drafting of the agreement until its execution. This article aims to provide an in-depth study of the laws governing contracts by exploring the legal theories and doctrines that govern contract law, particularly on understanding how these basic principles form contractual obligations and agreements. A doctrinal legal research is used to analyse the selected legal theories and doctrines, providing an understanding of each theory’s use in the context of contract law. This study reveals that these legal theories affect the formation, interpretation, and execution of an agreement. The analysis indicates that these theories have significant effects not only on the parties involved in the agreements, but also on society as a whole, by reinforcing the principles of fairness and autonomy in legal transactions. These findings have significant implications for understanding contract law, enabling individuals to better navigate and negotiate the complexities of legal agreements before the parties agree to execute the contract. It is hoped that this study will help strengthen the understanding of contract law.

References

Abdullah, F., & Shaik Ahmad Yusoff, S. (2018). Consumer Protection on Unfair Contract Terms: Legal Analysis of Exemption Clauses in B2C Transactions in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(12), 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.812.1097.1106

Abdullah, N. C. (2018). Legal Research Methodology. Sweet & Maxwell.

Ashley, C. D. (1913). The Doctrine of Consideration. Harvard Law Review, 26(5), 429–436.

Beatson, J., Burrows, A., & Cartwright, J. (2016). Anson’s Law of Contract (31st ed.). United States of America: Oxford University Press.

Bishop, J. D. (1995). Adam Smith’s Invisible Hands Argument. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3), 165–180. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25072635

Boldeman, L. (2007). The Cult of the Market Economic Fundamentalism and its Discontents. Australia: ANU E Press.

Bowen, H. (1936). Adam Smith - Radical. Pi Gamma Mu, International Honor Society in Social Sciences, 11(3), 265–267.

Bridwellt, P. (2003). The Philosophical Dimensions of the Doctrine of Unconscionability. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1513–1532.

Burton, S. J. (1980). Breach of Contract and the Common Law Duty to Perform in Good Faith. Harvard Law Review, 94(2), 369–404.

Campbell, D. (2014). Good Faith and the Ubiquity of the “Relational” Contract. The Modern Law Review, 77(3), 475–492.

Charny, D. (1991). Hypothetical Bargains: The Normative Structure of Contract Interpretation. Michigan Law Review, 89(7), 1815–1879.

Chynoweth, P. (2008). Legal research. In A. Knight & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1097/00128488-200112000-00003

Collins, H. (2014). Implied terms: The Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Current Legal Problems, 67, 297–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuu

Contreras, J. L. (2015). A Market Reliance Theory for Frand Commitments and Other Patent Pledges. UTAH L Rev, (2), 479–558.

Dimatteo, L. A., & Sacasas, R. (1995). Credit and Value Comfort Instruments: Crossing the Line from Assurance to Legally Significant Reliance and toward a Theory of Enforceability. Baylor Law Review, 47(2), 357.

Dowd, K. (1996). The Case for Financial Laissez-Faire. Source: The Economic Journal, 106(436), 679–687. Economic Duress after the Demise of Free Will Theory: A Proposed Tort Analysis. (1968). Iowa Law Review, 53(4), 892–924.

Edwards, C. (2009). Freedom of Contract and Fundamental Fairness for Individual Parties: The Tug of War Continues. UMKC Law Review, 77(3), 647–696.

Fares, M., Coase, R., E. Williamson, O., Klein, B., G.

Furubotn, E., Ghestin, J., … D.

Libecap, G. (2004). The Economics of Contracts: Theory and Applications (E. Brousseau & J.-M. Glachant, eds.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Giancaspro, M. (2019). Testing the boundaries of the consideration doctrine: Can you contract to buy and sell a ghost? Alternative Law Journal, 0(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X19882485

Gluck, G. (1979). Standard Form Contracts : The Contract Theory Reconsidered. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 28(1), 72–90. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/758554

Goff, F. R. (1947). Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. Quarterly Journal of Current Acquisitions, 4(2), 11–13.

Golecki, M. J. (2003). Synallagma and Freedom of Contract - The Concept of Reciprocity and Fairness in Contracts from the Historical and Law and Economics Perspective. German Working Papers in Law and Economics, 2003(18).

Gordon, J. D. (1990). Dialogue About the Doctrine of Consideration. Cornell Law Review, 75(5), 986–1006. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23.

Grene, M. (1939). Theories of Interpretation in the Law of Contracts. The University of Chicago Law Review, 6(3), 374.

Hawthorne, L. (2008). Materialisation and Differntiation of Contract Law: Can Solidarity Maintain the Thread of Principle Which Links the Classical Ideal of Freedom of Contract with Modern Corrective Intervention. Tydskrif Vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg (Journal for Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law), 71(3), 438–453.

Irakli, T. (2017). The Principle of Freedom of Contract, Pre-Contractual Obligations Legal Review English, EU and US Law. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n4p62

J. Parish, W. (1945). With Due Respect to Adam Smith. The Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 26(3), 217–227.

Jaffey, P. (1998). A New Version of the Reliance Theory. Northern Ireland Legal Quartely, 49, 107.

Jovanovic, M. (2012). Legal Methodology & Legal Research and Writing.

Kennedy, D. (2000). From the Will Theory to the Principle of Private Autonomy: Lon Fuller’s “Consideration and Form.” Columbia Law Review, 100(1), 94–175.

Koo, Z. X. (2011). Envisioning the Judicial Abolition of the Doctrine of Consideration in Singapore. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 23(2), 463.

Krishna, P. R., Karlapalem, K., & Dani, A. R. (2005). From Contracts to E-Contracts: Modeling and Enactment. Information Technology and Management, 6, 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-005-3901-z

Lorenzen, E. G. (1919). Causa and Consideration in the Law of Contracts. Yale Law Journal, XXVIII(7), 621–646.

May Fong, C. (2009). The Malaysian Contracts Act 1950: Some Legislative and Judicial Developments Towards a Modern Law of Contract. Jurnal Undang-Undang, (36), 53–81.

Mayer, D. N. (1990). Jurisprudence of Christopher G. Tiedeman: A Study in the Failure of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism. Missouri Law Review, 55(1), 94–161.

Nolan, D. (1996). The Classical Legacy and Modern English Contract Law. The Modern Law Review, 59(4), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1966.tb02103.x

Ottinger, P. S. (2000). Principles of Contractual Interpretation. Louisiana Law Review, 60(3), 766–791.

Perillo, J. M. (2000). The Origins of the Objective Theory of Contract Formation and Interpretation. Fordham Law Review, 69(2), 427–477. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.262445

Pheng, L. M., & Detta, I. J. (2014). Business Law (Second Edi). Malaysia: Oxford University Press.

Rodl, F. (2013). Contractual Freedom, Contractual Justice, and Contract Law (Theory). Law and Contemporary Problems, 76(2), 57–70. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24244720

Rosenfeld, M. (1985). Contract and Justice: The Relation Between Classical Contract Law and Social Contract Theory. Iowa Law Review, 70, 769.

Savirimuthu, J. (2005). Online Contract Formation: Taking Technological Infrastructure Seriously. University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, 2(1), 105–144.

Schwartz, A., & Scott, R. E. (2003). Contract theory and the limits of contract law. Yale Law Journal, 113(3), 541–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657531

Schwartz, A., & Scott, R. E. (2010). Contract Interpretation Redux. The Yale Law Journal, 119(5), 926.

Schwenzer, I., & Marti Whitebread, C. (2015). International B2B Contracts - Freedom Unchained? Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 4(1), 34–46.

Trakman, L. E., & Sharma, K. (2014). The Binding Force of Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith. The Cambridge Law Journal, 73(3), 598–628.

Vibhute, K., & Aynalem, F. (2009). Legal Research Methods.

Viner, J. (1960). The Intellectual History of Laissez Faire. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 45–69. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/724811

Wacke, A. (1993). Freedom of Contract and Restraint of Trade Clauses in Roman and Modern Law. Law and History Review, 11(1), 1–19.