THE REGULATIONS AND CONTROL OF ONLINE BETTING IN MALAYSIA

The aim of this paper is to create awareness of the threats of online gaming to Malaysia and the International society in various areas such the involvement of money laundering via online gaming. It also includes suggestions of countermeasures and regulations that could be implemented in Malaysia. The paper will achieve this by having an insight of the accessibility of the online gambling to Malaysians and the law and regulations available in Malaysia to combat and cater the existence of online gambling. Law regulating gambling in general could be found in Betting Ordinance 1953 and Common Gaming House Act 1953. Account of initiatives taken to be taken by the Malaysian government will be in scrutiny in this paper. In addition, a review into the other jurisdictions from United Kingdom, United States and the available international law and regulations on online gambling such as the European Commission Green Paper: Online Gambling in the Internal 2011. Besides, the paper will also be viewing into the legislations of Commonwealth countries such as Australia on the online gaming such as the Interactive Gaming Act 2001. Nevertheless, there will be an in-depth view relationship of money laundering and online gambling. There will be suggestions of possible mechanism to regulate the online gambling activities in Malaysia in order to protect the interest of the people. Malaysia has legislations on gambling which do not specifi cally touches on online gambling and probably could be revised with new provisions in regulating the new entity, the online gambling. The practical implication of this paper is to emphasise the utmost importance of having awareness and revised strategies against the threat of online gambling which involved the unlimited access of internet and the inevitable necessities of new legislations and control mechanisms by the government authority to curb the peril. This paper could provide 1 Lecturer, Faculty of Business and Law, Multimedia University, 75450 Bukit Beruang, Melaka, contactable at 062523408. 2 Researcher, Faculty of Business and Law, Multimedia University, 75450 Bukit Beruang, Melaka contactable at 0126587122.

in general could be found in Betting Ordinance 1953 and Common  Gaming House Act 1953.Account of initiatives taken to be taken by the Malaysian goverhment will be in scrutiny in this paper In addition, a review into the otlzerjurisdictions from United Kingdo% Unifed States and the available znlernational law and regulations on anhne gambling such as fhe European Comission Green Paper Onlrne Gambling in the Internal 2011 Besides, the paper will also be viewing into the legislations of Commonu~ealth countries such as Australia on the online gaming such us the Interactive Gaming Act 2001.Neverthele#s, there wrll be an in-depth view relationship of money laundering and online gainblzng There will be suggestions ofpossible mechanism to regulate the online gambling activ~ties in Malaysia in order to protect the interest of the people Malaysia has legislatioiw on gmhling which do not specgcally touches on online gambling andprobably could be revised with new provision8 in regulating the new entzry, the online gambling.l%e practical impheation of this paper is to emphasise the utmost importance of having awareness and revised sfrategies against rhe threat of online gambling which involved the unlimited access of mternet and the inevitable necessities of new legislations and control neechanisins by the government aufhorip to curb theperil.This paper couldprovide

Introduction
Gamblii has rooted in Malaysia since the early 19"' century when the Chinese traders and seamen came to Malaya.They brought the culture of gambling with than and I d been regularly practising than during their free time.Nevertheless, the English Colonial master played a role in bringing different card games that have been popular inMalaysia as well as theHorse Racing game.It had been a famous activity in the Great Britain during the 1700's.This c u b e continues till now, Traditional gambling is no longer a new terrd in Malaysia.However, the latest trend that has been plaguing Malaysia since the late 1990" still now is the internet gambling.Internet gambling arises due to the blooming of the usage of internet.One of the most famous internet gambling is on the area of sports such as soccer and football.This has then raised an aLanning issue onthe government ofMalaysia as they could notice a sharp rise in the existence of "entertainment outlet" which is actually the den or vice of gambling.Then, the government realises furtller that there is a close relationship between internet gambling and sports.In many muntries around the globe, internet gambling involving sports is common and legally recognised.Nevertheless, in a counby like Malaysia and Singapore, it would he hardly legal and strongly against by the govermnent.
However, there are very few avenues for the gambling i n d u w in Malaysia which are legalised.One of the few famous avenues is the Genting Highland Casino.
The twistof events happened in the latar years wherethcGove~nment of Malaysia came with an extraordinary but brave idea to provide license to certain vendors or business entity to carry out legal online gamblig activities.One ofthe main players who attempted to obtain the very pioneer license is the tycoon Vincent Tan.This suggestion of legalising online betting came with mixed feelings and opinions from the different p d e s in Malaysia As the majority of the population of the country are Muslim, those who profess Islam as the religion, they are totally against tbe legalisation of online betting.The Islamic political party (PAS) was tbe first to object to the su~estion as they considered that the betting activities are against the principles of Islam.Whereas tlxere were different opinions, for instance, the fanner Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tun Dr Mahatbir Mohamnlad who strongly agreed and support the decision of the government?
There are nlany arising concerns pertaining to the suggestion of legalising the online betting.This will be then discussed in the following section oftbis paper.In this paper, the issue focussed on the regulations in the pipeline in legalising online betting in the context of Malaysia and on the regulations made by other commonwealth countries and Malaysia comparatively.

Regulations and Law Existing in Mahysia
There are existing local law and provisions overseeing tbe issue of ganlbhg in Malaysia Gaming and wagering are regulated with extreme care in Malaysia.As the official religion of Malaysia is Islam, the authorities have been adhering to the prohibition on gamblii as stipulated by the teachings of Islam.F i t and foremost, the Malaysia's Contract Act! stipulated that any agreement by way of wager is considered as void with the exception that to certain prizes for horse-racings.Nevertheless, there are exceptions whereby legal licensing could be provided to either the private companies or individuals.These exc~ptions are being controlled by the following statutes of law:-(1) These provisions control the issuance of license to operate gambling activities of the respective kinds such as the casino, lottery or sweepstakes.Each ofthe kind is controlled by the respective statutes of law, There are restrictions to illegal gambling in the public such as stated in Common Gaming House Act 1953.The qualifications of items present at the scene of crime will be for arrest also being stipulated in the First Schedule of the Act.
There is no clearprovisio~~that regulate online gaming in the countly.It is only deemed to be illegal to conduct the gambling activities without permission or license: from the authority.Vhe statutes which are currently available as stated above are not up to date as they are legislated during the era without the application of internet.Hence, the provisions are not sufficiently adequately in controIling the gambling activities in the advent internet usage in the modem world.
For instance, the definition of "com~non gaming house" provided under s2 of the Common Gaming House Act 1953 is confined to the word "place".However, the current trend of online casino is virtual casino which does not involve any physical place like the conventional casino which could be found in a pre~nise.Worse still, most ofthe activities are condnctedvia the computer ofthe individual or patrons who visited the gambling wehsite.The question will be whether the provision provided to define a "common gaming house" is adequate to include online casino.
In addition, the suggestion of the government to legalise the online gaining is not all negative as there are actually good reasons for supporting the idea.Firstly, it could function to reduce the amount of illegal bookies and at the same time acting as the double edge sword in gaining financial benefit by way of taxation and licensing fees.
Through legatising online gaming, the number of illegal bookies could also be reduced along with the statistic of crimes related to gambling.As there are legal online gaming companies, government could also keep track of the patroniser of the wehsites as well as control the enviromnent of the intemnet gaming by enforcing certain laws and regulations.

S27 Colmnou Gamblmg House Act 1957
Another coucern is the uprising of the patronising of citizen into online casino which the government will have no full control of the situation.The uprising amount of cases will not be proportioilal to the effectiveness of enforcement measures.Hence, by lcgalising the online casino, the government could reduce the burden of another so called "crime" to the current overloading workload of the enforcement team.

Regulations of the Online Casino
This part will be on the suggestion to possibly regulate the legalised online gaming activities.Tllese suggestions would be partly consist of endeavours carried out by other countries such as Austmh and European Union in ensuring the public policy of the country is adhered to.
Australia has been experiencing ups and downs in the control of gamblimg.One of the most important legislations in the gambling history of Australia is the Interactive Gambling Act 2001?The act includes prohibition to interactive services provided to the customers in Australia as well as the designated countries, it provides for a complaint-based system to meet the needs of providing intelligence and information about prohibited Internet gambling service provided to customer in Australia.The act is applicable to services is provided in Australia, whereby it will be under the Australian police force duty to arrest.The Australian g o v m e n t will also filter the ISPs of the internet gambling services and inform the ISP provider of any infringement.The government will then negotiate with these eoinpanies on the n e c e s w fdtering procedures.This is a good law inthe way that the Australian government has initiatives in protecting the Australianationalf from the negative effect of internet gamblimg.

i) Australia Productivity Commission
On the 2Td June 2010, the Australian Productivity Comnlission released its report on The report shows a sipnificant advancement in the Australian gambling regulation as compared to tile previous Draft Report published in October 2009.The commission is set up by the Australian government to give a concise report on the gambling industty concerning matters such as the implications of the new invention such as Intemet on the convention regulations and law in Australia as well as tbe suggestions of good laws that could be legislated in Australia.
There are sdvcral key f~vilings relevant t~ this paper.Firstly, the Australian Productivity Commission or APC found from the research that the Intemet gambling does have benefits and at the same time poses a risk immense social risk in the society.Hence, there should be a proper regulation to control online gambling.In addition, the commission also pointed out that the current Interactive Gambling Act 2007 has barely being effective in reducing the demand for online gaming activities in Australia and the effectiveness is deemed to reduce over t l ~e time.It is also found that the prohibitions applied by the Interactive Gambling Act (IGA) do not provide adequate protections for the Australian online gambler."Most importantly, the coinmission emphasised on the concern of the flow of revenues and currency out of Australia to the offshoie casinos which obviously has been shown to be iton-beneficial to the economy of Australia Based on the commission research is found that the consumption of Australian custoiners to the international online gambling websites has staggering increase.Tbe statistics has equally represented that the Interactive Gambling Act has not effectively reduced the demand of the Australians in onlime betting.
In this respect, the winmission to the legislator suggested to legalise online gambling but imposes minimal restrictions, so that the government could he able to gain benefit from it.In conclusion, the comnlission found that online betting has it special benefits but also poses risk to the society.The findings of potential harm posed by the online betting should be coupled with necessary regulations and law so that it could miniiise the harm but not with pure restrictions to onlime gaming.It is also suggested by the commission that there should be a gradual liberalisation to the restrictions on online gambling starting with the low risk services such as poker card games.Other suggestions are that other gambling forms " Online Gsming -" Australran Productivzty Commrsslon Fzrial Report on Gamblmg" (June 20 10).
b e i i exempted from IGA d~ould be subjected to some regulatory procedures such as display the infoimation on problems of gambling and automated warning on the potential pattern of play.
To date, the Australian government absolutely is not supporting the idea of liberalisation of onlime betting.Thus, the IGA prohibition of internet betting is to stay for now.Tlie rejection of the suggestions ~f the mmmission does not actually prave the entire inadequacy and is relevancy of tilt paper.There are still inany good suggestions to be picked up by Malaysia and Smgapore that are in the pipeline to legalise the onlime betting services.
As summary to the above context, the initiative of the Australian government in restricting citizens from using the high risk gambling services is a good policy which oould be likewise applied in Malaysia This initiative could help to reduce risk and harm to the citizens while the government gain economical benefits from the gambling activities.Total restriction to online gambling lm proven will not be able to reduce the demand of the online gambling.

ii) Green Paper of EU
The following section of this paper will be examining the suggestion provided by European countries as well as the European Union Com~nission on the restrictions and liberalisation of Internet betting.
European Commission has published areport on the online gambling in the Internal Market.12Tlle purpose of this paper was to provide information and suggestions to curb the bloomingnumber ofboth illicit and unauthorised on-line gambling to the citizen of European Union.
In the conlelrt of European Union, there are two extreme extents of approach fostered by the member.One of the extreme extents is by barnkg offer of certain online w i n g or even banning it entirely.Certain states, however adopt an open market policy.From the research of EU, the on-line gambling services yearned to grow and will continue to double by year 2013.The consistency of the ~egulations on online gambling in Europe is barely satisfactory with the different approach applied by the different inember of the state.For instance, any services offered by electronic method will be restricted tbrough the national legislation of the Member states disallowing the online services to consumer in the corn@.It created Allowance is expressly provided for in Article 51 and 52 of TFEU or is being justified in accordance to the case law for the interest of the public.In order to preserve the interest of the public, there is certain number of provisions under the consumer protection and the prevention of fraud on gaming would also be applicable.
A very vital point in providing a regional protection to ASEAN or Asian countries is to come out with a treaty on having consensus on websites thai could be accessed by the people in Malaysia.Failure of the restrictions occurs when there is lack of diplomacy ties or consensus with other countries that provide the onlime gaming services.The internet providers in these countries will have to abide to the treaty as it has been effectively incorporated in to the looal law.This is another important point is where the treaty must be treated supreme.Thus, one of the meU~ods to ensure the treaty i s effective is to include the clause inclusion compelling of the local law into the treaty.
Additionally, with the help of the joint co-operation of these countries, the sharing of information on identification of citizens for the use of identification would be made easy.Any foreigners or online user thaf would like to subscribe to certain online gambling services will have to provide their personal details including the passport number as well as the social security number.Hence, in coping with any frauds or scam, the information of the users will be sl~ared among the members of the consensus and arrest could be inade as that will assist the Interpol as well as other agencies in tracking down the ctiminal or suspects.
Other than the above discussed provisions, the EU also worked together in sharing details of the legal, authorised and licensed service provider of gaming in the respected countries.This will help the members of the consensus to identify providers which will likely to provide safe trade to the people and also to protect the consumers from being framed into the fraud and crime by syndicates onhe.This initiative willmost likely redwethe risks ofthe online gamblers.It was stressed in the paper that one of the reasons where online ganing might contribute to the rise of fraud by operators is because of the lack of direct contact between the consumer and the online gambling operators.It is a substantial risk as compared to the traditional gambling ~narket.'~ The other problem as pointed out in tbe paper is on the risk of addiction by the users.It was known that the ability to permanently access to the online gambling services had significantly increased the risk of tile consumer to suffer from the addiction of the games.The lack of control and the high amount of offers will increase the prevalence of gambling addictions.For example, most of the cyber ganbIers participation be anonymously and in isolation.They could either play or participate in the game with other gamblers or played alone just bebind computers.This will create an absence of social control towards the activities and will then develop gambling addiction.Ig

iv) Online Gambling Services Establishment in EU
In reference to Article 49 TEEU, the definition to the word 'establislnnent' is being too wide too wide.There are several different understandings to the word.Firstly, it will mean to allow an EU national to take part in the economic rife of another Member State and profit from the participation.Besides, it will also involve the contribution of the EU nationals to the economic growth and social interpenetration within the C~mmunity.'~According to e-commerce per~pective,~la business entity that provides information society services will be considered as an established business entity where there is econotnlc activity interest.National law will then hold certain threshold on the number of licenses that will be permissible or even banned it entirely.Hence, providers of the services will have applied to tlle license in each of these Member States so as to be considered legal establishment.

Problem Gambling in EU
Gambling problems exist in European well as the other counterpart around the globe.Hence, in order to assess the severity of the problem gambling problem in a certain population, there are two inventions of prevalence studies which could be implemented.They are the DSM-IFZ and SOGS.23They are being carried out to screen and identify the risky gamblers.This test is being used as the slqndard testin eight Member Stat# extensively a s well as another seven countriesz5 which were carried out on limited scope.Tllere are several main factors being identified by these studies that highly jnfluenae the problem of gambling.
Firstry, it is the event frequency.It is regarding the time gap between one set of game from the other.It is of the opinion that, the gap between the game and the risk of placing astake bas a close relationship.Secondly, it is the payout interval.It is the time between placing of stake and announcement of the result.It is known that the briefer the payout interval greater risk there will be .Other than that, the accessibility and social environment also play an immense role in on gambling.What added to the graving situation is the extensive coimercial advertisement that entices people to continue ~i t h betting or to even get involved in betting for the first time.It was also known that different types of games or different kinds of bets will cause different risks to the players.
There are also some suggestions of instrument that could be applied to handle the g d m g problem.First of all, the age liinit could help to confine the risk to just certain age group of people especially for those who do not possess the maturity to make good decisions.T l ~e ~e other options beings suggested like the self-limitation in the The other suggestion is by providiig information or warnings that could be applied o n l i e ahout significaat risk to the particular player.There should be a meci~anism whcre warning will be givm when there is certain trait or pattern of p7.y that may contribute to debts and over-limit loss.The oornmission also suggested the banning of credit use.This could prevent exceeding self limit situation where credit overdraft runs out of hand.It is also part of the online operator duty to ensure that the customers do not excessively indulge in the games by promoting some educational tutorials.Warnings should also within every short period of break.The authority could narrow the bad gaming attitudes by providing a restrictive clause on certain forms of games or bet with a high risk to the consumer.

vi) Public Order: Prevention of Fraud
The green paper also provided a valuable piece of information on the prevention of fraud in the process of legalising online gambling.Fraud is no longer an uncommon word when it comes to online gambling.The EU law aims to protect the consumer from any form of fraudulent activities regardless of players or operators.This could be closely associated with the identity theft and match fixing issues that is alarming these days.26Tbe commission bas identified three main types of fraud.Firstly, the players do hot receive their winnings and capital.It could normally be seen in illegal lottev scams.Secondly, another type of fraud is when either the companies sold the identities of the clients to the unauthorised parties or when the unauthorised parties took part in a heist or hacking proms in order to obtain the information of the customer.Lastly, to make the matter worse, these parties might even tamper the credit card information in order to obtain fraudulent income f m n the action.All the fraudulent activities should be taken into serious consideration and should be coped without hesitahons.In fhe Green Paper of EU, there are two different polarity of money laundering being mentioned.Firstly, it is the complex transnational operations where is it carefully designed to conceal the original criminal involving large runount of money by making the people and property made to be legally recognised The other type of money laundering is when the activity of concealment extended to all m g e of sum no matter is big amount or small amount.Lnevitably, there is almost no evidence suggesting that the online gaming in Europe is involving any money laundering activities.
In practice, the online gambling firms could bank in the winnings as amount unused funds into an account once the original bet is made.This could further complicate the process of detecting money laundering activities when these players could register several different accounts with the same operator.In peer to peer games such as e-poker, the money launderer could use the nature of the game where money or value could be transferred from one player to another when a win or lose game materialized.This is online chip dumping.For instance, player could deposit a large amount of illegal money from illegal proceeds and dumps the credit to the other player who is his accomplice.Another important issue of money laundering in o n l i e gatning is the involvement of e-cash which is also similar to the Stored Value Cardsyas these methods of payment will involve no PO*-purchase monitoring.

In the Context of Malaysia
As this paper has brought the issues and suggestions of reform from the differentjurisdictions around the world ahout the enforcement of online casino, the following will he the suggestions on measures that could be taken to ensure the people in Malaysia will be protected when the online gambling is k i n g legalised for the advantage of the economy of the countly:-" A stored-value card refers to lnonetiuy value on a cad not in an externally recorded acwunta~ddiffers fromprepard cards wheremoney is ondeposit with the issuer similw to a debit cad.

i)
First Issue: Money Laundering First and foremost, it is important for the government agency to limit tbe number of licensee oftheonline betting.There should be a specidised agency in dealing with the online gambling issues.Only those with the license will he allowed to be accessed in Malaysia.
Hence, the legal online gambling providers will have to comply with a list of restrictive order by the agency before being permitted to operate.In order to cope with money laundering in online gambling, t b e should be transparent client information to the government agency.The agency could then detect any possible money laundering activities froin the sharing of ioforination witb other financial institution and mternational authorities such as tbe Anti-money Laundering bodies (AM.).
CZIstotner Due Diligencethe service provider should always only allow players holding avalid account to play.Information should be provided by way of application form when the customer applied an account.All tbese information will have to be provided to the government agency for analysis.These providers should give full co-operation to tlle AML as weU and follow strictly to the rules and regulation provided.The due diligenc, exercises conducted by the internet providers include among others identifying depositjtrades analysis, abnormalities of player behaviour or patterns and the initiation of cybercrimes arrest policy.
Pqment Controlsfhe service providers should always ensure the consistency of the payout and payment.They should always make sure that they have a control over the credit card numbers and other personal data of theplayers.
In addition, there should be acontrol of credit that could be provided to tbese players according to their financial soundness and security background of the players.Certain procedures such as deposit and charges should be applied to ensure that there will be no extreme debts cultivated.These authorised casinos will have to comply witb the standards stipulated by the government agency.
Besides, there should he a strong link of co-operation between the hanks involved in the transactions and the government agency in order to control any fraudulent activities as well as money laundering from being rooted in se~~ices.It would also be wise to establish a highly secured transaction pipelme for the consumer in order to protect the consumers from possibly risk of crimes and fraud as well as identity theft.
Operattonal Controls-the internet gambling providers should always have the age verification lists as well as other lists used by the banks to identify terrorist and politically exposed persons (F' EPs).One of the best examples is tl~e World as well as the European Sports Security Association's (ESSA) list.29The providers should always adhere to the procedures to keep track of every transactions and activities.They must always submit the Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) to the national Financial Intelligence Units (FIU).

ii) Enforcement and Related Matters
There are many concerns of illegal trans-national market to be accessed by the consumer.The main reasan to this concern is when there is no effective enforcement of law.It is a vital point to ensure that there is effective enforcement in ensuring that the government could achieve the goal to protect the public interest when passing a bill on gambling policy.Gamblirrg po1i.qthereshould be joint organisational structures among the countries ilxroughout the globe in carrying out regulations, licences and supervision of online gambling.
The function of the authority is to issue license to the eligible applicants.There should be a control over the number of licensee.A strict examination and requirements shall be fulfilled by the licensee before the issuing of license.This organisation should ensure the maximum amount of certainty when it comes to the financial information as well as other information of the providers.The authority should also be given the power to suspend and revoke any licences when f k providers disobey any of the guidelines.
The authority must control and carry out supervision the financial control as well as the technical aspect in monitoring ofthe activities and complaint of the customers.
The providers shall always maintain transparency towards the government agencies as well as other regulatory bodies.Information of the licensee holder, players as well as tbe fraudulent operator should be share among the agencies and bodies.It would be agood practise to wny out public campaign creating awareness of the negative effects of gambling to the so~iety.
Providers of internet giunbling, either domestically or internationally should be applying for the license of operation via the government agency in Malaysia They should be able to provide defailed information of the directors as well as all the members involved in the entire co-operation.It will have to be coupled with the assurance from government entity from the country of operation or even private established companies.There should be a strong link of security where these companies will not he involved in fraudulent activities, Tbese companies should also provide information on the financial background of the companies for the past years as well as providing a considerable amount of deposit before the application could be processed.
These companies should abide to the directive of the government agency on the restridions of players as well as the amount of money should he involved in the particular activity for each member.These websites should~allow the government agency to be the first in line control gate to the players where security measure involving these government agencies could be incorporated in the website.There should be a clear and transparent flow of information by these companies to the Interpol and govemment agencies involved.

iii) Control of ISP and Payment
The payment and communication providers give lives to the online gambling service, Hence, in order to restrict the illegal gambling services, die following will be the possible measures to be taken:-Domuifi Name System (DNQJilters-Filtering DNS is a mecl~anism where it could ensure that the potential customer is being pfevented to patronise illegal pre-listed sites or being directed to another website.So, there will be a list of banned wehsite or DNS where no one using the particulat internet provider will be able to access.
In rhe context of Malaysia, there wiU be a need to control the flow of internet gambling services that could be accessed by the people.It could bedone by restriction viaDNS as well as the IP address which will be address later in this paper.Another way to restricting the consumers from being addicted to online gamblmgis by restricting the group of people that could be involved in the game.Firstly, there should be a restriction of age group.This is where the players have to register to t l ~e government agency and also to provide the information to the providers on their age and.This helps to ensure that the underage citizen will not be involved in the gambling activities.Maturity of the player is also ensured and thus one can decide reasonably while gambling.
In addition to that in order to ensure the reliability of this process, all consumers who desire to access to the gambling services will l~ave to apply to tbe government agency for their financial status, security background as well as basic details.This measure is to ensure that only the qualified group of people is being allowed to be involved in these activities.This could restrict the high risk people for instance, low income as well as past addictionsor group of people who are prone to debts from involving in the activities.Hence, this govem~nent agency could act as the control to the flow of consumers into websites that provide the service.Tbere will be a coinpilation of information of these players as well as for the player; they will receive a highly encrypted ideacation card that will allow them to join these websites, Internet Protocol (IP) blocking-Every device that is associated with the public internet access will have its very own identification called as IP address.This will include the hostname.Hence, with this blockage, it could prevent the connection between a serve with one or mo= IP addresses.
Manual of MentalDisorderS, 4th ed. for pathological gambling, (Amencan Psycluatrrc Association, 1994).A publicatton of the 5th edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) 1s fomseen for May 2013.The South Oaks Gambling Screen, Lesieur & Blume, 1987 Both tools (DSM and SOOS) alm exist in vers~ons adaptedto adolescents.DSM-N-J (juvenile), DSM-IV-MR-J (niulhple response-juvende) ahd SOGS-RA (revised for adolescent8).BE, DK, EE, El, DE,NL, SE and UK 'I B, HU, IT.LT.RO and SKaspect of financial and time as well as self-exclusion.There should be restrictive guidelines on the amount of leverage and risk that could be imposed on the person subjective to the financial standing and other factors.

for the onbne gonzlng sccborl" ((accessed on 4th of
Due to the advent of internet and the fast paced growth of online gambling opportunities coupled with tbe inconsistent regulations andnon-unifonn enforcement of the different member of the states, it is inevitable and nearly favourable for the development of a great number of unauthorized cross-border markets.It may consist of the black market as well as the "grey" market.13Hence,it is suggested that there should be a synchrmized of legislation in providing securily to the entire EwopemUnion society and not anon-miform legislation.As this paper discusses on the staggering growing amount of gaming revenues, the Green Paper provides an insight of the statistics.It was measwed on the basis of Gross Gaming Revenue14 and was approximate -2 75.9 billion.It is 7.5% of the entire gambling market. Green Paper "On on-lme gmzhlmg m fhe hternol Marker'', Ewopcnn Co~nntission.SEC(241113Zl /?mi" (Accessed oil 24* March 20 11) Figure 1.Projected increase in three main categories o f remote gamblingL5 iii) Cross Border Treaty: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) One of tl~e important provisions in TFEU is Article 56 where it prohibits restrictions on the freedom to provide service to other Member States.It functions to protect the economic activity that falls under the scope of the Treaty.16

"
Operators of theonline gambling that n duty lrcei~sed in one or nwre Meniber States by pmvidmg services to citizen of certain country without oalnplying to the existed law of &e country l4 Stakc yrfees but ~ncludmg bonuses